3442
Comments (129)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
37
LiddleMarco 37 points ago +38 / -1

Yeah that phrasing sounds like bullshit. You audit THEN recanvass THEN recount, you don't do them all at once.

29
NvJohansson 29 points ago +30 / -1

You're right, but the important part is the audit. As long as it's being audited with true bipartisanship, then they get verified. So any altered ballot, fake ballot, a ballad that's been passed more than once, deceased voters ballots, out of state ballots all get dumped and will not be added to the final tally. That's the important part.

But then we have the whole Dominion fiasco which is going to wipe out tens if not hundreds of thousands of ballots anyways. So they should have fixed the Dominion glitch, redistribute the votes as they should have been then audit and count

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
14
NvJohansson 14 points ago +14 / -0

Then it's pointless.

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

ballots from in person (trump) and mail (biden) are not the same as far as I know. in person literally prints a piece of paper with a barcode whereas the mail ballots are done by hand and signed etc

6
KnightKreider 6 points ago +6 / -0

You can count them all and audit later you just subtract the ones that fail the audit at the end. It can be done, the question is will they.

4
Here_we_go 4 points ago +4 / -0

How do you pull out the bad ones? They are all mixed.

3
KnightKreider 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh, I see because they are anonymous. Nevermind. All we can do is determine how many votes shouldn't have counted and then see if it matters.

1
TwoCents 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then it doesn't matter which one you take out