65
Comments (8)
sorted by:
7
bellcurvestrikesback 7 points ago +7 / -0

He never addressed why Trump's votes DO conform to Benford's law and admits this in the comments, saying he "didn't have the time" to explain away that

5
PNW_PEPE 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is the important thing. We all know Benford's is not the "gold standard tool" to evaluate elections. But the point is, we have a pattern that follows expectation for all other candidates -- why not Biden? This raises the flag. This requires further investigation. So we investigate. Then they cry because the statistics are telling us something is abnormal. So pathetic.

6
eclectiledysfunction 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hes being intentionally misleading. Hes only looking at non-swing states or counties that aren't contested.

Not to mention he doesnt even USE Benford's law in the video. He looks at vote totals and not the leading digits, giving the impression that he's "analysing data" when in reality hes using the wrong process, applying it to Benfords law, then claiming he got it right.

Thats like using agricultural techniques to analyse the moon landing.

5
I_Love_45-70_Gov 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anyone shilling to disprove massive, nation-wide election fraud is a commie propagandist.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
TConway 4 points ago +4 / -0

Downvote him to hell @[email protected]

3
Anon_0xFFFF 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm not a math person - but I have watched this faggot for years on youtube - after 2016 this turd went full UK Cuck.

2
Bazzellle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Listen to whole thing. At end he tells you to verify stuff yourself cuz people got objectives.

All he proved to me was that it indicates something to be looked at and judged. Benford laws calls Biden to be reviewed. Using method of last two digits, Trump needs to be reviewed.

So, a method used in accounting shows there are anomalies that need to be verified. Ok, I think that is the general jest of what is going on. Anomalies have been detected and now being verified.