9035
Comments (453)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
46
Wrexxis780 46 points ago +46 / -0

Its not, the FEC even said so.

20
WeaponizedAutist1776 20 points ago +21 / -1

It's ridiculous at this point. Even with lawsuits and SCOTUS decisions, we will never get to the bottom of it... Auditing 150+ million votes would take forever as well. Might just re-organize it and put national guard in each polling place...

10
MerchantMan99 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yup. I don't want these so-called "poll watchers". They'll just get kicked out again. Bring armed men who won't get pushed around.

7
abetterreddit 7 points ago +8 / -1

We need the type of dudes who will say:

I'm not here because I have your permission. I'm here because you don't want me here.

6
iamherefortheluls 6 points ago +6 / -0

the FEC did not. A person sitting on his thumbs in a defunct FEC that has no quorum, went public with his personal opinion, which has zero authority behind it.

But yes, it's kind of screwed up.

4
ObjectiveReality 4 points ago +4 / -0

The chairman of the FEC without a quorum