It shows a possibility, and combined with other direct examples (ex: letter carriers association-who publicly endorsed Biden; being told to back date mail in ballots) and indirect examples (ex mail in ballots being found in the woods; the guy burning mail in ballots), a propensity that the USPS assisted in the steal of the election.
What this does is cast an even more dark light on the validity of mail in ballots and in effect, can ruin the plans for “mail in is the future.”
It matters for two reasons. One, it's illegal for them to not deliver mail, so it's noteworthy on its own. Two, it shows a pattern of behavior, and patterns are important in legal cases. This helps the Trump team challenge mail in ballots in PA.
Wait what? So does this matter at this point or not?
It shows a possibility, and combined with other direct examples (ex: letter carriers association-who publicly endorsed Biden; being told to back date mail in ballots) and indirect examples (ex mail in ballots being found in the woods; the guy burning mail in ballots), a propensity that the USPS assisted in the steal of the election.
What this does is cast an even more dark light on the validity of mail in ballots and in effect, can ruin the plans for “mail in is the future.”
I agree. It reveals USPS bias. I just pointed out that it's not about the vote ballots.
It matters for two reasons. One, it's illegal for them to not deliver mail, so it's noteworthy on its own. Two, it shows a pattern of behavior, and patterns are important in legal cases. This helps the Trump team challenge mail in ballots in PA.