🚨🚨🚨 TRUMP WON NEBRASKA NE-2! SWITCHED VOTES + BENFORD'S LAW PROVIDES PROOF! 🚨🚨🚨
(media.patriots.win)
🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
Comments (128)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Audit all 50 States. Write President Trump snail mail today!
I want to see NY, VT and NH audited VERY badly.
The President asked for snail mail requesting 50-state audit. I'd link but dang search function down. Anyway, write the WH about those States and the rest.
I heard someone else on here say it was fake he requested that. Wouldn’t he tweet it?
True. Didn't hear it was fake. I might send a letter anyway.
Saaaame
Seems an odd request to me so I believe it's fake at the moment. I hadn't seen anything on him saying that.
Heard it was fake as well
You can use a regular search engine to search TD.WIN. Just use site:thedonald.win as one of the search terms.
Same. NY is probably bright red after Cuomo.
Audit. Every. Ballot.
Let's GOOOO!
No fuking way Biden won anything in Nebraska.
Sarpy and Douglas are pretty cucky counties
I think you mean lancaster and douglas. Sarpy is tons of Airforce
District 2 is all of Douglas and western Sarpy
Lancaster is Lincoln. State Capitol, second largest city, home of NE University.
Yup
douglas for sure
Can confirm. Omaha and Lincoln ruin us almost every time.
Johanns was the last good thing to come out of Lincoln. The place is ran by absolute retards. No one questions why the city isn’t taking care of the sidewalks or streetlights. Only the university matters
they ran off the state fair. all of the parks are total crap. moved the yearly fireworks show so it was closer to the mayors house. the pools are crap. pot holes everywhere. they fucked it up. I left years ago and it was semi decent. went back last year and was like 'what happened to all the playgrounds?!' 'what happened to the ice rinks' 'why are there weeds everywhere' every single time 'our mayor....'
Same exact experience
Thank-you
Nebraska switched to new ES&S voting machines this year!
This is the amazing pede that ran Benford's. You can see what data he used in his post.
Data on switched votes came from this amazing datapede's post
Please feel free to do your own validations here, analyze further with Python scripts as well as tweet and email this to those that need to know. Nebraska's Congressional District 2 was likely decided in 2020 by 30,000 votes. Trump won it easy in 2016. This was an important part of the steal!
EDIT: Added data sources, other info.
Fun fact: That company makes one of the machines that has been proven to be able to mark the ballot after the voter has voted.
I couldn’t open link so that might be the video I am referencing)
Someone needs to slow down and translate this so that it can be easily explained to the layperson.
269 UP!
MAKE IT SO, 2020! THE LEFTIST TEARS MUST FLOW!
Also, this graph don't show shit.
Two scoops
Two terms
Two genders
Two 69
As an Omaha voter, I pray that this gets reversed.
Happy to hear that, Pede!
Lincoln here
Also happy to hear that, Pede!
Hey, I’m really Hillary Clinton, you have exactly 3 hours left to live, I have now locked in your location. Bye!
Classic Hillary, always suiciding people
Such wacky antics! They should make a sitcom about it. And every time a fresh child is in the house, the silly neighbor John Podesta can show up and size it up like Alf eyeballing the cat.
Same. I have a hard time believing it went blue. A lot of military live in Sarpy, but many in Douglas, too. I’m a military spouse and we are in Omaha. I’m trying to find out if my vote was counted or if they tried to steal my vote but I can’t even find the website in my searching. Looking into #maidengate too since I have a maiden name and was getting voter mail (but not a mail-in ballot). Anyone have that website to check the vote? Every site I find just takes me to my registration:/
I thank your husband for his service! Yeah I was hoping the Offutt Air Force base would turn the tide, and, if the fraud is true, it definitely helped. Too many spoiled millenials in this town, believing lies and accepting them as truth.
He said, “Thank you!” I completely agree- I see a lot of patriots around the area, but there are a lot of liberals running around. Part of it is the indoctrination of LinkedIn and their Silicon Valley policies that they bring to Omaha. Also, Patreon is here as well as other tech companies. Not all have liberal leanings but many do. That’s part of the problem. I hope our fellow patriots at Offutt and surrounding areas have helped shown the fraud. 🙏🙏 I’m happy to do my part to help.
Praying isn't enough. You need to contact your local gop and state representatives. As far as I know no one is actually fighting for Nebraska now.
Guys, vet this info first. We have a lot of other quality evidence. See other rebuttals on Benford's Law. There's a lot of conditions which if met make Benford's Law useless.. ie if the ward/precinct sizes are all similar, it should force even valid results to fail Benford's Law. Remember, we're not the MSM, we don't take bits of pieces of info and blast it out.
This, I just watched stand up math's video on this subject. Benfords law requires a dataset that spans multiple orders of magnitude...election votes in precincts are the opposite of that, and are roughly the same size. Benfords is a red herring ...there is an ocean of fraud evidence elsewhere...this is not it!
Bedfords Law is an indicator that an anomaly exists, not proof of fraud.
A totally separate issue is vote switching, which is when you can point to flips in the reporting of a specific number of votes at a specific time, in a specific direction. Vote switches are actions that affect the count.
Second on the Stand Up Maths' video on Youtube. He basically explains how there isn't enough of the magic sauce in that data that makes Benford's Law work, and the anomalies you're seeing are actually just the raw data showing through. He also looks at the data a different way, shows an example that looks like an anomaly in Trump's data, and again shows that it's just highlighting the raw data.
many precincts do span orders of magnitude, and were fine previously for proof. But I do agree it is not conclusive as is.
Benfords law is almost always obeyed in elections. It is really simple math. It's only in this election that people are gaslighting about it. When it is disobeyed in one county or state, and if it coincides with some other fact like a new electronic voting system is used, that is a big red flag. Ignoring it is like ignoring the sound of someone breaking into your house at night.
In Nebraska a recount of the district in question would probably solve the issue. That is not very hard to request. And I think people will be open to a hand recount.
The real danger is the machine will keep flipping votes in future elections, so this problem won't go away if you ignore it.
Regarding debates about data spanning several orders of magnitude. Can you also express the numbers in base-5. You then have enough digits for statistics (the law is a little different in base 5). And even 15000 votes is 1000000 in base 5, so your data easily spans 6 orders of magnitude.
Yeah, it is supposed to work in other bases.
However your math is a bit misleading, just because you convert the digits to base-5 you would still have the same number of votes, since each digit representation still only counts as 1 vote and we express numbers for statistical validity in base 10.
Of course you could convert EVERYTHING to base-5 including the statistical validity, but that is unnecessary. Just convert the digits to base-5, but you still have the same votes. Regardless, 15000 votes do not necessarily span many orders of magnitude, since ever precinct could have the same number of votes, say 1000 for example. But its possible that each precinct saw very different numbers of votes, in which case you would observe 10 in one, and maybe 1000 in another and maybe 5000 in another.
Contact Don Bacon! Ask him how he beat that retard Eastman so easily but our district didn't go for Trump. https://bacon.house.gov/contact/
Retarded piggy
This one vote might end up making the difference.
Bonus if it makes it a tie!
While Ben Sasse won't care this is a huge deal! Pete Rickets and the unicameral need to address this ASAP
I believe Trump won NE-2 Omaha area in 2016 if I'm not mistaken. Makes sense.
I can assure you Trump won all 5 of Nebraska's EVs in 2016.
Confirmed here
No. Hildebeast won it then also.
Wrong. Trump won all 5 EVs in Nebraska in 2016. Won the 2nd CD 47-45%
Damn. My bad!
Oh I do have a vague memory of that, thanks Pede!
This is the way
Trump’s numbers are funky too though.
thats what I first felt too that while Biden's looks crazy the President's "curve" would violate the law as well. I would be more than happy to have a state wide audit there to find the true count - even if Biden ends up winning after an audit at least the public can better accept that it was vetted properly that way.
If they took votes from Trump it might also affect the curve.
Yup. A different kind of fraud they were doing at the same time might do something like that you'd think. I think shortly after everyone said "why are all the votes for joe biden?" another huge dump happened and there was only like 12k votes for trump and a metric fuckload for biden and that might be what we're seeing here. They might have cheated extra trump votes to look less guilty maybe.
If it was 'switching' votes, then it would inherently affect both curves.
Well then do an audit to make sure the votes are counted correctly.
Because they manipulated those as well
if they were manipulated it would make sense.
What it shows is high probability of external manipulation of the votes. If Hammer and Scorecard function as described, it can potentially skew both vote counts to get a desired result. What I took away from this, is that it had to grossly skew in favor of Biden votes to get him to win, which explains why Trump votes obviously were switched.
A full audit should be necessary.
Audit CA and take out the millions of illegals that voted for Biden and we flip house seats. In 2018 449,000 people gave the reason they couldn't do jury duty was they weren't citizens. CA motor voter laws turned CA deep blue with illegals voting. Also check all the H1B visa Silicon Valley guys and see if they voted illegally and prosecute and deport all of them and their families.
Can someone look into MA and RI (after we secure victory of course.) Nobody looks up here because the numbers are small but the people here are SICK of leftist BS and we’re convinced something is up. I’ll tel you the number of Biden signs were few and far between.
Yes, the data sources are in my larger comment above, please check everything and post additional findings.
Is this using Edison data again? How sure are we that this isnt because Edison is reporting rounded percents and not more precise ones?
It's funny, the RINO in Philadelphia, Al Schmidt, that President Trump was trashing the other day, was heavily criticized for taking campaign contributions from ES&S Voting Systems. And, amazingly, Al Schmidt claims there is absolutely no voter/election fraud.
As a Nebraskan, this makes my Dick hard
Something is off about the election in NE-2; there were fewer votes in that district for president than there were votes for congressman. That makes no sense...
I grew up there. call state legistlature and governors office and demand an audit/hand recount of this district. but be polite about it. Nebraskans are very poliite and responsive to polite requests. show tell them or tell them about credible evidence regarding benfords law and voting tabulation.
I don't think Benford's law works on numbers that small.
Which version of the switched votes list are you using? There have been critiques and updates.
This is the pede that ran Benfords.
Data was from here.
Lots of irregularities with these counties. The 2016 to 2020 comparison does not add up.
Another problem is that a simple application of Benford's law does not work well where the county sizes are not randomly distributed. For example, if many counties have 1000 seats it then it's unlikely that Trump or Biden would have a vote number starting with a 1. Digits 3-6 would be more likely.
Would be very interesting to see Benford's law for 2016.
Benford's law only works in multiple ranges of magnitude, where some counties are hundreds of votes, thousands of votes, tens of thousands of votes, etc....
An easy example is between 10-199, you're naturally going to have more numbers starting with 1 because 100-199 all start with one. 10-299 will have more 1s and 2s because 200-299 all start with 2, all the way to 999 till you have 9s to equal out, then from 1000-1999, they all start with ones, so there will be more 1s again.
But if the orders of magnitude are all the same, it's different. Say it was 100 counties with populations between 100 - 999, with most counties being in the middle. If you charted a graph of first number of the population of county, you'd get a "Normal" bell curve like graph, with 4 and 5 being the most common and and 1 and 9 being the least. If the populations were random between 100-999, it would be a flat line.
In Nebraska, I'm guessing many of these counties are 4 digits, so it would skew the graph.
AUDIT!
Let's see the damn Electoral Votes be added up for Donald J. Trump! More ammo to make the libs weep tonight!
Contact this pede! He wants that data to do a Python analysis!
Profile
Not surprised at all
Send it. https://defendyourballot.com
Benford's Law doesn't work well on precincts. It needs evenly distributed numbers across order of magnitude (i.e. 10-10000) to work nicely. Precincts are too similar in size.
show surrounding counties
How many does that make total in country?
Well let’s get a fundraiser and investigate Nebraska. Then there is no possibility of a tie.
What is the count now, what site should I use to see the count.
Megan Hunt is gonna REEEEEE so hard when this one gets overturned.
Plus he was winning Omaha earlier in the night.
Benfords law only goes so far. It works really well for differences in sets by orders of magnitudes. Not so much for sets of 3 digit numbers.
Just saying... we need to be careful how we use benfords law. For sets like this it’s a good way to point an initial finger but doesn’t prove much for these kinds of sets.
That’s said.... audit!
Was wondering what happened there.
so what's in the works to correct the fraud?
District 2 is Douglas County (Omaha) and the western part of Sarpy County. Lincoln is not part of it.
That's true, people are just pointing out that Lincoln and Omaha are the left areas of Nebraska.
These graphs are just graph gore.
https://electionresults.nebraska.gov/
Download NE 2020 election data totals by precinct to Excel from the corresponding links on above.
Compare Senate Data vs. President data by political party for Douglas County alone.
Douglas county's election for President received 268,417 (33,986 more than Senate) total votes to 234,431 for the Senate.
When comparing political party candidates, only one Presidential candidate received more votes than their Senate counterpart, Joe Biden. He received 61,661 more votes than Chris Janicek, the Democrat running for NE Senate.
President Trump received 17,336 less votes than Republican Senator Sasse.
Jo Jorgensen received 10,339 less votes than her Libertarian Senate candidate Gene Siadek.
President Trump had fewer votes (on average 15% fewer) in every one of the 230 plus precincts except 5 (in those 5, President Trump had a total of 14 more votes than Senator Sasse). Jo Jorgensen had fewer votes (averaged 196% fewer) in every precinct. Joe Biden miraculously had on average 42% more votes than the Democrat Senate candidate in every precinct.
It would appear from this comparison the steal was from both candidates opposed to Joe Biden and an additional 30,000 plus votes were also manufactured for China Joe beyond those likely stolen from President Trump and Jo Jorgensen.
A simple manual audit of 10 of the 230 plus precincts in Douglas County should uncover the steal methods deployed. 3 of the precincts had fewer than 150 votes each (these are 01-12, 08-10 and 08-27). I'd recommend starting with them and add 7 other counties that had the larger discrepancies. I'd include 06-25, where Jorgensen had only 3 votes compared to the Lib Senate candidate with 49, and Biden got 643 compared to his Dem Senate candidate with only 265, and President Trump ended with only 492 compared to Sasse's 639.
This data was as of 11/11/2020.
Amazing work here! This should be its own post!
Thanks.
Turns out very similar happened in Sarpy County. In Sarpy county it appears they took 3,213 from Jorgensen and 5,753 from President Trump. It also appears they added an additional 8,456 to CCP Joe's total. In Sarpy Senator Sasse (and likely President Trump) had such a commanding lead 66% to 27% (Dem) and 7% (Lib), they weren't able to steal enough to put Biden into the lead. Instead they just increased it similarly to Douglas, Increasing Biden on average 44% per precinct (increased in all 50 plus), while decreasing Jorgenson by 133% on average (she had less votes in every precinct) and President Trump's by 12% on average (decreased in all but 1 precinct) as compared to their Senatorial party running mates. The ending margin of victory in Sarpy was President Trump at 54%, CCP Joe at 43% and Jorgenson at 3%.
If anyone is connected to the NE Republican leadership that can actually conduct a manual audit, feel free to share this information with them.
Also, I encourage anyone to look at the data from NE link above and see if they come to same conclusion. This would explain the NE2 outcome. I'm guessing this had to be done electronically and the few precincts that President Trump didn't have fewer votes than Sasse in, either had such large leads for President Trump (as compared to Sasse and/or Biden) the algorithm couldn't overcome the lead or the individual precincts caught the errors through their own manual review.
You have no idea how crazy libs are here in Lincoln. You would think being a red state it wouldn't be so bad. But both Lincoln and Omaha are all locally controlled by Ds.
The local paper will be talking about local city policy and when you read the comments some woman is shouting about Trump and COVID for no reason.
I blame the universities in Lincoln and Omaha. Also emerging tech jobs that attract the worst people all over.
I'm in ne-2. Is there any way to check and see if my vote was switched?
Just trying to call balls and strikes here. While Biden's votes don't fit Benford's law neither do Trump's (to a much lesser degree). This is reason to dig further but will not convince anyone that isn't already fully on our side. More evidence is needed.
Is this official, or is this just conjecture at this point?
Wait, Trump's numbers don't follow benford's law either....