I don't like the premise that our side has to find x quantity of fraudulent ballots in order to overturn an election, where x = the difference in vote totals between candidates. It should instead be sufficient to demonstrate that the process was corrupted on a large scale, and consequently the final count cannot be trusted.
I don't like the premise that our side has to find x quantity of fraudulent ballots in order to overturn an election, where x = the difference in vote totals between candidates. It should instead be sufficient to demonstrate that the process was corrupted on a large scale, and consequently the final count cannot be trusted.