CRITICAL: ANY PEDE THAT CAN HELP US GET A DATABASE.
WE ARE CALLING FOR; Data Scientists, Mathematicians, Statisticians!
WE HAVE: Time series edison data for all US counties in 1000 intervals spanning Nov 3 - Present Day. ALSO County level results, population data, covid infection/death stats!!
π¨π¨π¨HELP US FIND HOW MANY DEAD PEOPLE [INCLUDING COVID DEATHS] DEMOCRATS FUCKED UP AND STOLE A VOTE FROM.π¨π¨π¨
WE NEED: People to help define functions to extract evidence of fraud or statistical anomalies
ITS ALSO HELPFUL IF YOU CAN: Visualize and publish findings as graphs and map layers
SEND ME A DIRECT MESSAGE AND JOIN OUR TEAM OF ELITE PEDES. WE HAVE SOMETHING HERE DEMS CANT BUY WITH ALL THEIR BLOOD MONEY!
> CRITICAL: ANY PEDE THAT CAN HELP US GET A DATABASE.
> WE ARE CALLING FOR; Data Scientists, Mathematicians, Statisticians!
>WE HAVE: Time series edison data for all US counties in 1000 intervals spanning Nov 3 - Present Day. ALSO County level results, population data, covid infection/death stats!!
π¨π¨π¨HELP US FIND HOW MANY DEAD PEOPLE [INCLUDING COVID DEATHS] DEMOCRATS FUCKED UP AND STOLE A VOTE FROM.π¨π¨π¨
>WE NEED: People to help define functions to extract evidence of fraud or statistical anomalies
>ITS ALSO HELPFUL IF YOU CAN: Visualize and publish findings as graphs and map layers
SEND ME A DIRECT MESSAGE AND JOIN OUR TEAM OF ELITE PEDES. WE HAVE SOMETHING HERE DEMS CANT BUY WITH ALL THEIR BLOOD MONEY!
We do. No shills allowed
I PM'd the mods asking them to sticky you. I hope it works.
No newbies, unless you can turn them inside out and check.
So are there alternatives for doing that literally? Just saying I'm new, I'm a data nerd, I've been conservative for my whole life, and NOBODY's ever seen or been up there, not even a doctor.
So like a CT? X-Ray? I'm down for that.
Probably a twitter feed, or another source might work for them. IDK
Are you on our discord? Mods there are supreme vetters.
I am new and need to get vetted. Can you possibly let me know how I can get onto the discord channel you mentioned?
I understand the need for caution with newbies
I just PMed you volunteering my time, although I'm a lurker, so not much of a record. Happy to video chat or send you a pic showing my Trump flag and gun collection so it's obvious that I'm not a bad actor!
Suggested vetting process:
A penis is:
A) exclusive to the male anatomy.
B) Delicious
More than 5 days, 5 posts and 5 likes here would be a good start. Kek.
Hold a bottle of soylent in front of them for 30 seconds. They'll shake like a junkie with a jones.
I just checked for shirts and giggles only because of my post, we both joined 357 days ago. l guess that's a pass, kek.
Freedom seeds in .357 are my favorite! The digits have spoken.
Kek Same day I joined.
Magnum Opus.
Iβm close! And Iβm a programmer and in a group doing this too.
5 terms, 5 scoops, 5 peace treaties!
Penis posts and likes ?? Directions unclear. Dick stuck in pepe.
You didn't say how it ( B) ) would be cooked though.
Raw like a sushi roll
Bahaha nevermind, I'm out. Edit - I'm being facetious and I'm totally in... I'll adjust and say I agree with A and don't have the experience to claim a stance on B, nor am I willing to work with that particular data set.
Please donβt allow Mike Obama in
We had some cases already thrown out because it turned out some of those dead on the voter roll didn't vote. We also found out some people are in fact alive. I read an article about this the other day. The family saw their name floating around in the dead voter list and complained. Please make sure they are Dead Dead. Don't want us to look stupid and get things thrown out
Not only that, there was that post that was stickied that wasted an entire day and the effort of thousands which was a deliberately bad analysis of a bunch of rounding errors.
I want to make a Clinton or Epstein joke here really bad.
Totally get it though. This HAS to be both watertight and bulletproof.
That's probably why all the info and links to data isn't posted. You get in once you've been verified.
ditto to this. bad actors can contaminate a project.
Mods! Need a Sticky!
OG TrumanBlack needs our weaponized autism!
I second this. The more hands we have on deck, the better.
This needs to get a sticky
Also a sticky for how us retards can help. I dont know how to computer.
Learn to code! :)
Planning on it!
Iβm getting out of coding and heading for the coal mines!
Yeah, this type of project might involve a lot of stupid grunt work that can be compartmentalized for security.
I was going to give an example but all the ones I could come up with, I could write a script to automate.
oh my god, I'm going to be one of the ones replaced by robots first....
If you can help with the communication, that would be a huge help.
Upvoted, but this better be legit. Some other knowledgeable-sounding pedes have cast doubt on your previous research, and I'd kind of like to hear your response to that.
We are are taking into account all criticism and fighting to show you guys proof. We haven't stopped . Those questions are welcomed they make our research stronger. When it's in a court we will win.
Brother, you have started the digital militia. The bad guys don't have a prayer. Much love from us old fart non tech pedes!
Would love to help, could speak more in PMβs, not sure how to use PM on this site
Go to a user's page, go to the far right hand side, there's a box labeled "ABOUT (USERNAME)".
At the bottom of that box is a faint grey "send a message" button.
You go to someone's name and then click the 3 line "E" looking thing on the top right.
If you are on desktop or using desktop view, you just click on the user and it's right below the logout button on the top right and above the "suicide hotline" thing.
It shows user info and has a button to message.
copy the persons name. go up to the bell in the upper right. then go to "create a msg". paste the users name there. it's kind of hard to see.
Click name.
On right side is now "Send a message"
I'm really sick of seeing people post IT'S HAPPENING and seeing them (fail to) discover the concept of ROUNDING. Check my post history. If you want my help let me know.
YES. Hard questions prove legitimacy, unlike what MSM claims
Obviously I am new here, but I can say this regrading making sure this is legit. The data source needs to be authenticated. If this already is posted, please accept my apology. To authenticate this data, we need:
I am sure there is more we can do than that, but I think common sense would indicate we need at least that much.
Question: Do we have an established communication link (point of contact) with the official campaign for communicating findings and providing what they need in the form they need it?
am not good at crunch'n number as much as i am presenting the graphics via M$ Excel Charts... ping me if there is a need for Polished Presentation of Data
if you can clean up the PA voters over 80 https://gofile.io/d/XwcWGo https://1fichier.com/?gqxdx82szi5lttdoehv2 https://1fichier.com/?gqxdx82szi5lttdoehv2
philly over 80!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! https://anonymousfiles.io/5IGRJpGu/
need county name full date of birth full address County is very importanyt when you look it up on PA site you need county
Got this file cleaned (PA192xx.csv -> PA192xx_cleaned.csv) https://1fichier.com/?b0ijf36vi0wrrptp0fg2
Please let me know if you can use it
hey is there any way you can leave in the birthdates? can do anything without it sorry dude I know its a lot of work
Hi I just checked the output csv file. It has date of birth column INTACT. I checked from top all the way to bottom. I re-created the file and re-upload it again (but it is the same content). Can you please check again https://1fichier.com/?u6w66ibi71d3hd6t60q0 do let me know if still have problem. Also do you need the other two files (5757_DataRequest 5758_...etc.) be cleaned up? I can do that if needed. Thanks.
its missing the birthdATES. fkk cant run it wo bdates
Hello
So I helped to clean up the file PA -- 192xx.csv (link https://1fichier.com/?gqxdx82szi5lttdoehv2 last night and posted it back. The cleaned up version of that record, about 3MB, was saved here https://1fichier.com/?b0ijf36vi0wrrptp0fg2 It is a csv file and contains only the name, gender, date of birth, street address, city, and COUNTY, per sperg's request. Each column is labelled should be self-explanatory.
PhD in Electrical engineering and Masters in mathematics from a top tier school here. I work all day with statistical signal processing. I'm chomping at the bit to get my hands on any data you can make available. Just point me to where I can download it. I'd love to run some statistical models against it.
I've got all the Edison data for PA thru.....4 ish days ago. Links were posted that need to get re-stickied.
I'll tell you what I tinkered with...PM me and I'll give you a snippet of the Edison data that showed them moving 54 votes but it shifted the vote_share of the candidates by 18k votes because someone along the line appeared to confuse a ratio (0.006) with a percent (0.6%). It favored Biden. I was trying to write a simple script that could demonstrate how such an error could be made intentionally to always benefit a candidate but not be obvious.
There's also mad places in their data types for intentional precision loss like in Office Space. Votes are floating point doubles not bigints and they work in decimal fractions of a vote sometimes. Its fucking weird and suspiciously so to even a noob like me. Like you can't bury all kinds of clever fuckery in there? Of course you can.
I dunno, there's a lot of rabbit trails.
OK my idea is to take some known statistical models, based perhaps on what Dr Shiva did at MIT or perhaps Klimek's and Yegorov's paper, which has been cited a bunch of times here.
You build a two hypothesis model. One hypothesis has a normal election, with it's approximate normal distribution for the turnout and the vote percentages, the other model either assumes that votes were stolen for the winning candidate (in that precinct) or added to that candidate (thus increasing the turnout).
From that you can compute the posterior probability that a precinct/county was fraudulent, and theoretically compute the approximate number of ballots stolen.
Dr. Shiva's idea can also be used here. Conditioned on a voter being republican (or democrat), what is the probability that they voted for Trump? No doubt you will see massive violations of this; apparently not just in democratic strongholds, but in Republican strongholds via the vote fraud machines in use.
Gonna try to work on this this weekend. So far I've downloaded all_states_timeseries.csv. I'll read this into Julia and start filtering. The time series is also very informative because the fraudulent precincts routine violate the law of large numbers. Their vote totals don't asymptotically converge to a constant fraction of the number voted.
Do I have the right data set for this?
You're taking the right approach with this. Godspeed.
I found a lot of issues with Dr. Shiva's presentation. I'd love to get the underlying data to investigate myself.
Basically they show a scatter plot of data from three counties and try to draw some conclusions from it. The way they construct the scatter plot is odd, needlessly complicated. There's no need to do subtraction to see the features they're looking for, and doing so actually makes them harder to detect with human eyes. They were looking for a downward slope and then made their scatter plot follow the line y=-x. Of course they're gonna find a downward slope on that line! Just plot the data normally and you don't have to discern if the downward slope is in the data or in your presentation of it.
They do compare it to one other county and there is obviously a mistake in their plot of what "no algorithm detected" looks like from that one county. There are points on it that can't exist given their methodology. One example: There's a point at (4, -20), which would mean Trump got -16% of the individual candidate vote. There are also a ton of points at x=0 which would mean multiple precincts with zero % straight ticket Republican. Honestly their "normal" county is much more suspicious.
The fact that both these issues exist in the presentation raises huge questions for be about their competence and honesty.
But are you sure they presented changes in percentages of total votes, in stead of percentages change relative to republican votes?
Because it could be Republicans got 4% straight ticket votes, and Trump got 3,36% percentage of total individual votes? Relative difference -16%?
Not sure about which plot you are referring to, but there is merit in looking at the odd reduction in support among republicans, as the republican vote increases. That fact alone smacks of fraud, and does suggest that there is vote switching.
Normally I would think this is just karma farming, but itβs the same pedes who did the other big analysis.
I don't care about karma bro. But we had a great response and we still more hands! Our deadline is too fucking close! We need every pede to see this
Exactly. I tried pointing out you guys are legit.
I can 2nd he is legit.
What kind of evidence is there that the Edison data is coming out the machines, and isn't some kind washed data for the purposes of driving TV graphics? It seems unlikely that it is actually The Data, since it is only 3 significant digits and features tons of weird behavior that will (of course) look very suspect? In PA, Trump lost 300k votes, but Biden lost 600k votes using the same methodology. The more likely answer here is that the data isn't pristine.
Look at the Edison website. Or look at the post and find Edison. Also it's not the only data we have.
Do we have any data from the state governments themselves?
like Wayne County, a cesspool of voter fraud
One of the things I keep pushing (in line with your concerns) is this super weird pattern in VA:
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8Eb5Pcs/hey-va-lets-talk-fairfax-fuckery/c/
If this bit was βwashedβ it was washed with muddy water. It also does not expressly involve the imprecise vote share values (you can see screwy things from the full-precision total vote count changes alone). The vote share stuff is supplemental, though.
Yeah. I think we need some kind of assurances that finding discrepancies in this data will be something meaningful in terms of what needs to be done: demonstrating in court that the votes as decided right now are incorrect. If I show up before a judge with this, is he going to say, "You've got my attention" or is he going to say, "I don't have jurisdiction over the NY Times data feed."?
I am an undergrad in my Junior year toward a Statistics degree. I would be glad to help in any way I can even though my knowledge isn't probably the best yet Β―\(γ)/Β―
Youβll unlock greater potential by dropping this knowledge perspective. βUndergrad in my junior yearβ isnβt informative to anyone it says almost nothing about you until it is considered that you said it.
Iβm certain there is a massive knowledge gap between the worst and best undergrads in their junior year of statistics.
You know what you know and you can apply it or not. If you really want to test your mettle dig into some of the public data.
You have to pm him.
3 databases here all of wi and all of PA and people in PA over 80 probably the most urgent is PA over 80
https://gofile.io/d/XwcWGo https://1fichier.com/?gqxdx82szi5lttdoehv2 https://1fichier.com/?gqxdx82szi5lttdoehv2 philly over 80 https://anonymousfiles.io/5IGRJpGu/
How did you get them what's inside
the three databases thank you I have three databases now https://gofile.io/d/XwcWGo wi https://1fichier.com/?gqxdx82szi5lttdoehv2 all of pa philly over 80 https://anonymousfiles.io/5IGRJpGu/ PA voters over 80 years old
couple of us bought the databases from the states websites and tried to get into workable files, no more time to get them into a more workable file needs to be in better hands than mine, the PA over 80 will probably be the quickest way to smoking guns I have been typing them into the https://www.pavoterservices.pa.gov/pages/ballottracking.aspx and looking for dead people the hard way
Thank you so much for this we appreciate it a lot. Drop by later you will see great results
https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/triblive-tribune-review/obituary.aspx?n=john-c-stouffer&pid=182206634 dead he is #1 on the list and he voted absentee I started on PA cuz I think that is critical at the moment. if we could get an excell of deads and het it to who needs it in PA and Trump admin
Thank you so much if you wish to join our team send me a DM
So this can track mail in ballots only.
yup
I've done some data scraper based automation to autofill forms.
need someone to help verify the best method to check the data.
where are the best websites to check the above?
have scripts on findagrave and other sites I can rework to use this dataset.
What are some 'out of the box' tools for similarity checking, like "Bob, Robert, Rob"? How about soft hits with a letter or two misspelled? Do you have to fire up some Apache SOLR or Elastic Indexing with this to get the near-hits?
Not sure what do you mean by "out of the box". Perhaps it would indeed be the simplest to use solr.
In any way, solr works by splitting text into words, then applying various filters to words and keywords, seeing how many matches (and how much they match in case you use Levenshtein distance) and ordering by this score. For something like this, I would use a database of name synonyms, soundex and metaphone filters, Levenshtein distance, LD applied to the filtered words etc.
Some resources:
Yeah, this stuff, good deal. 'Out of the Box' kind of means that it exists already easily as a product - we don't have time to invent one and customize it or contort it... We need free or reasonably priced, ready to go, useable tools.
Is there some open source indexer that already wires in the 5 concepts you linked? Is there one that has those 5 features available as plugins?
Yeah, this stuff, good deal. 'Out of the Box' kind of means that it exists already easily as a product - we don't have time to invent one and customize it or contort it... We need free or reasonably priced, ready to go, useable tools.
Is there some open source indexer that already wires in the 5 concepts you linked? Is there one that has those 5 features available as plugins?
Solr is open source and it has it all. But for more control you might want to build your own.
I'm using pandas dataframe then text pattern matching.
typically convert all text to lowercase.
when I'm searching findagrave for example, it will return fuzzy matches, then I will seek matches on birthdate.
at least one of the registered voter datasets I'm using only has year, so I have to search voter registrations to obtain month (just test each month until I get a hit)
then search findagrave using the month and year + fname + lname to search.
You using an api or a scraper to grab that findagrave data? Or both?
custom written scraper.
I couldn't find an official api. wrote a custom scraper that behaves well enough to not trigger alerts. It's slow. I will be scaling that scraper to enable multiple users to collect data and centralise storage + cross check.
can write scrapers for any other web forms to collect or validate data.
i have been entering line by line in PA https://www.pavoterservices.pa.gov/pages/ballottracking.aspx
You need to get someone that can write some code to do that automatically for you so you donβt have to manually enter.
I know. I keep asking.......
yep
will ask
I could do this in about an hour or so using Python, but I can not seem to even get to the ballottracking website. It just redirects me to some generic PA voter services website.
Have they disabled the link altogether? I tried with a VPN. Still no luck.
this link is to look up votes https://www.pavoterservices.pa.gov/pages/ballottracking.aspx
our archives are here https://1fichier.com/?gqxdx82szi5lttdoehv2
philly over 80 https://anonymousfiles.io/5IGRJpGu/
they are all ok
the old link to download the database may have expired, we bought the databases and posted on T_D and they were good for 7 days
TX PEDE there is someone working on script to run a check on the voters, looking for fake.dead people
can you do https://anonymousfiles.io/5IGRJpGu/
county-name bday address and the last two which I think are date of ballot sent-recieved
TRUMANBLACKMUSTUPDOOT
I realized the reason Dr. Shivaβs line looks the way it does in the video when comparing straight ticket to voted Republican.
The reason the votes are more off in strongly Republican districts is because the cheaters ASSUME WE WONT RECOUNT REPUBLICAN DISTRICTS. They can rightly assume we will spend all our time and energy looking at massive democrat strongholds trying to pin down their corrupt ballot handling. While we focus all our time on these massive small geographical areas, the Dominion voting system will have secretly stolen a massive percent of votes for Trump in strongly Republican areas.
Simple solution, find a small city that is strongly Republican and uses the Dominion voting system. Hand count those ballots. This should will some massive discrepancies. The easy to find and prove votes are run by our good people!
The insidious nature of this way of counting also means that when you recount a city with 6k voters, and discover 1k of those votes really belonged to Trump or hand count vote totals end up larger than the machine tally, liberals will accuse Trump supporters of cheating in their districts. They donβt cheat like this in democrat districts, because they donβt want us to find the machine cheating, and they have predicted that we wonβt go looking in districts that we won.
You autistic fucks better put everything out the moment you find it and don't lift any weights while doing the mathematics.
Donβt get any sun, either!
cos tan = sin
(stolen from mathologer)
You guys are Chad mathematicians
I think you do it like this:
u/MIT_Patriot
Lol, try yelling
I can't help, but hope this gets stickied!
I'm a simple man. I see TrumanBlack, I demand sticky.
Bumping for a sticky. Go pedes go!
u/TrumanBlack remember deads are only the tip. Service Animals, Trans, Unrequested Ballout, Double Ballout, Maidens, Back dated Ballouts, Children/Babies. I'm helping with tips cuz not us person here. :D #edited Service Animals
Yeah, we can't boil the ocean all at once though. Those are some Zuckerberg level db/intelligence deductions. We don't have the raw data that doucher has. First two bites are probably just dead or recently moved.
I'm not saying we shouldn't find something that complex, just saying we have a pretty limited timeframe, and haven't even pulled off the basics yet.
Low hanging fruit. Go get it. Low effort, high return targets.
Ok. But you can isolate some variables, think children, animals. On county level. See what's bring up more votes. Run on high level than figure out more fraud.
Someone get this man some help!
Dude, Joe has dementia. All he has to do is skip his meds and he won't be fit to stand trial.
We might be able to still nab his shithead kid though.
Finkle is Einhorn!
https://1fichier.com/?k0a117v7gsxsv4vpuqg1
https://1fichier.com/?gqxdx82szi5lttdoehv2
Amazing work wanna join the team?
I donβt know his to DM, but Iβm a software engineer with a BI background. I can help
How to send a DM on the Donald.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxKVVYPi18o&feature=youtu.be
yes DM'ing you now
I wish so badly I could help you all with this, but unfortunately do not have the credentials. Iβll be praying that all who helps will have supernatural favor and God will open eyes to see everything there is to see and that all the right people will find all the right things!
Send me a pm
We have the best autists donβt we folks
Sticky?
REMEMBER ANYTHING YOU FIND REPORT IT TO THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN!
I'm not going down without a fight...
Thank you for all your work! I wish I knew enough to help. You're an inspiration to all. I saw several links today in the comments section of The Conservative Treehouse to your work here. My worlds are colliding. The Treehouse and the Donald are my two happy places.
Thanks again. You keyboard warriors are amazing!!!
I can't do any of that. But I can ROOT YOU GUYS/GALS ON like a MF'r from the crowd. YOU ARE THE BEST!!! YOU ARE THE ELITE!!! YOU ARE THE CHOSEN!!! YOU GOT THIS!!! SAVING OUR FREEDOM ONE STAT AT A TIME!!!! And Truly, Thank All of you. It's just absolutely amazing what you're doing.
HECK YEAH
Iβm a computer scientist working with big data. What are we up to?
Stickyyyy
I have two deceased sons. How can I find out if their names were voted for in NJ. Anyone have any ideas? I would appreciate the help. If they were, I will add them to the list of voter fraud instances.
I'll look into it. Meanwhile try look up on Google how to find it, make some calls. We will help
Thank you. I'm on it.
Here's a start to finding your sons' voting record in NJ. In the NJ Board of Elections, you have to set up a "My Voter Record" account (see link). Once you do that, you're supposed to be able to see the voting records.
https://voter.svrs.nj.gov/auth/sign-up
Thank you.
I work as a spatial data scientist, so I normally work with location based data, but data is data. PM me if you need a hand with anything. Fluent in Python, and use R occasionally for statistical analysis. I also develop web-based mapping applications if you think that can help.
Cheers
I've been working in data / data science for a bit more than 10 years. Experienced python developer. I'm working with data engineers and data scientists everyday.
Excited to help.
u/TrumanBlack/, i've sent you a PM with a bit more details.
I donβt know how to DM here but Iβd love to help. I have access to a powerful data aggregator (Domo) to help automatically run data if needed
the Dems seriously underestimated the support the voter base would provide, keep up the great work!!!!
hmm, am software guy but will message in and see where it goes.
I think I'd get a real kick out of being able to tell other canadians I helped get 4 more years... :)
Foreigners meddling in our elections? ;)
I can't help it, I want to watch 4 years of CNN creating crazy theories about justines socks and talking about the great maple syrup conspiracy. It's a sticky situation guys, you could touch it but you'd get sticky syrup on yourself.
Iβm a data analyst with access to Power BI and other enterprise software. Let me know what I can do.
I'm willing to help and be submitted to vetting. I've been around since the primaries in 2016. I miss the old cats like, u/DonaldWashington and the Daily Dose of Fake News guys. Talk about some legendary mfers.
THIS POST SHOWS HOW TO QUICKLY FILTER DATA ON LINUX
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XUp0P0/nerd-alert--if-you-are-on-linux-/
STICKY MODS!!
I've been an MS SQL Server DBA, t-sql / plsql expert (also working knowledge of MySQL and teradata). Currently manage a data warehouse team, BI team, and devops group.
I can only help about an hour - maybe 2 each night but I'm here if anybody needs help.
Background: 2016 election night was one of the happiest of my life (not kidding). It gave me hope that I'd never had before that our entire political system wasn't all just for show. I don't want that hope to die now.
I would be glad to help. I'm a simple guy with a few Google sheets and web design tricks to my name. What can I do for ya?
Consider hitting up the guys at chess.com or chess24.com, some of them seem pretty rightwing although they try to project neutrality mostly. Anyway, "electronic cheating," or just "cheating," (as we call it in the chess community), can be detected quite convincingly by highly sophisticated methods which have already been rigorously statistically tested in preparation for meeting legal thresholds in court; meaning, the chess world has been using algorithms to detect when someone is cheating, that is basically any non-natural pattern of moves, especially any that are too close to a computer trying to cheat.
Here is a fairly simple minded analysis using the absentee ballots reported in all_states_timeseries.csv, which is woefully incomplete sad to say.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ukGH11r9WWwSc7FfIb_A8fp3LP1Q0_cg/view?usp=sharing
It shows that the probability of fraud in Georgia and PA is nearly 100%. Actually AZ is fraudulent too, but the fraud occurred near the beginning when the absentee ballots were counted.