CRITICAL: ANY PEDE THAT CAN HELP US GET A DATABASE.
WE ARE CALLING FOR; Data Scientists, Mathematicians, Statisticians!
WE HAVE: Time series edison data for all US counties in 1000 intervals spanning Nov 3 - Present Day. ALSO County level results, population data, covid infection/death stats!!
🚨🚨🚨HELP US FIND HOW MANY DEAD PEOPLE [INCLUDING COVID DEATHS] DEMOCRATS FUCKED UP AND STOLE A VOTE FROM.🚨🚨🚨
WE NEED: People to help define functions to extract evidence of fraud or statistical anomalies
ITS ALSO HELPFUL IF YOU CAN: Visualize and publish findings as graphs and map layers
SEND ME A DIRECT MESSAGE AND JOIN OUR TEAM OF ELITE PEDES. WE HAVE SOMETHING HERE DEMS CANT BUY WITH ALL THEIR BLOOD MONEY!
What kind of evidence is there that the Edison data is coming out the machines, and isn't some kind washed data for the purposes of driving TV graphics? It seems unlikely that it is actually The Data, since it is only 3 significant digits and features tons of weird behavior that will (of course) look very suspect? In PA, Trump lost 300k votes, but Biden lost 600k votes using the same methodology. The more likely answer here is that the data isn't pristine.
One of the things I keep pushing (in line with your concerns) is this super weird pattern in VA:
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8Eb5Pcs/hey-va-lets-talk-fairfax-fuckery/c/
If this bit was “washed” it was washed with muddy water. It also does not expressly involve the imprecise vote share values (you can see screwy things from the full-precision total vote count changes alone). The vote share stuff is supplemental, though.
Yeah. I think we need some kind of assurances that finding discrepancies in this data will be something meaningful in terms of what needs to be done: demonstrating in court that the votes as decided right now are incorrect. If I show up before a judge with this, is he going to say, "You've got my attention" or is he going to say, "I don't have jurisdiction over the NY Times data feed."?