55
Comments (7)
sorted by:
5
ifoundtheidiot 5 points ago +5 / -0

I laughed out loud at “Government Officials Say.” If that’s the bar we ate screwed.

3
FILIPINOSFORTRUMP 3 points ago +3 / -0

LOL! YOU GUYS HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR 3 YEARS THAT THERE WAS FRAUD ON THE 2016 ELECTIONS. NOW YOU ARE SAYING THE OPPOSITE. BECAUSE IT FAVORS YOUR CANDIDATE? CAN YOU BE MORE OBVIOUS NYT? I HAVE ALREADY HEARD THIS STORY. (NYT, CNN, MSNBC AND MSM) THE BOY WHO CRIED WOLF.

2
CMDRConanAAnderson 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm getting used to this weasel-speak. State the elections were most secure ever(OPINION), then state the elections weren't COMPROMISED, which has nothing to do with the previous statement whatsoever. If I owned a bank that was the most secure ever and find evidence it was never compromised that does not rule out the possibility errors occurred on the behalf of employees. All the term compromised implies is that no one outside the facility intruded inside. It does not imply nothing went wrong, a claim they will never make.

2
Michelles_penis1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Take a good look. This is what a war without shots fired looks like. We were foretold. Make no mistake, we are currently at war.

2
Primebeef 2 points ago +2 / -0

It can't be compromised if it does exactly what you were planning to do in the first place! How is the penalty for treason carried out in the States?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
rusty_spittoon 1 point ago +1 / -0

"mostly" now means "not" we all know that by now