345
posted ago by NeilNewsNetwork +345 / -0

...there is MORE evidence that Q is true than there is that Global Warming is a problem, or that if true that any of the proposed "solutions" would solve it (or even help).

This endless Q-bashing by the MSM is nothing more than the idea that ALL pro-Trump voices must be silenced.

Comments (36)
sorted by:
23
Big-Dick-Dale 23 points ago +23 / -0

There's more evidence that this election is rigged than q being real, they still don't talk about it

6
NeilNewsNetwork [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

#truth

18
Lapstrake 18 points ago +19 / -1

3-star General Michael Flynn recites the Q oath and ends with Where We Go One We Go All.

https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1279590652200849409

If you think that the former Director of National Intelligence and National Security Advisor, both Cabinet level positions, would associate himself with an unknown internet troll, then you are an idiot.

https://i.maga.host/u4t4V4m.png

5
NeilNewsNetwork [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

I didnt say I was against Q

I just dont know enough to have a specific opinion either way.

I do know one thing, the Q people I have met at Trump events have ALL been super nice, awesome, patriotic people.

5
Lapstrake 5 points ago +5 / -0

My mistake fren

Meant to reply to one of the other comments.

3
NeilNewsNetwork [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

👌

4
Shalomtoyou 4 points ago +4 / -0

What does WWGOWGA stand for?

Just wondering. I saw earlier tonight that "Nothing Can Stop What iS Coming" is NCSWIS which is an organization... that I never heard of....

Just wondering if an acronym can also be made of "Where We Go One We Go All."

3
ZackMorris_osbro 3 points ago +3 / -0

The inscription on the bell, on the boat that JFK owned.

Where We Go One, We Go All!

3
Cropgun 3 points ago +3 / -0

The "q" oath?

That's just a generic oath of office. Not too different from the military oath.

1
Lapstrake 1 point ago +2 / -1

Where We Go One We Go All?

Listen to the end.

This tack goes nowhere. He's obviously aligned with Q. Why do you even bother?

0
Cropgun 0 points ago +1 / -1

I did listen to the end and I heard the "where we go" part.

3-star General Michael Flynn recites the Q oath and ends with Where We Go One We Go All.

You posted those are two different things. The first part is just an oath of office, not related to Q at all. You're trying to associate the two because you're too hard of a LARP. Stop. It's dis info to say it's q related

1
Lapstrake 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice try, but that doesn't make any sense at all. Why would all his family members who are not in 'office' recite the 'oath of office'. And they recited

Where We Go One We Go All.

You can't just bluster it away.

0
Cropgun 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are dense as fuck they literally recited the oath of office

1
Lapstrake 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you ever thought about love?

The true nature of human interaction?

There must be someone that is special to you.

Unless you are a Bobby O. Tiberius.

or a Bert Orpheus Talbot.

12
HeavyVetting 12 points ago +12 / -0

Q bashing probably a mixture of making Trump supporters look crazy and cover up any real leads that might be in there.

9
Leom187 9 points ago +10 / -1

Retards don’t understand that the bad guys can read q posts too. So why the fuck would specific times and dates and plans be spelled out? If you look at the big picture, it sure seems to be coming together, just not in a linear fashion.

3
Harambesbegottenson 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would also say the other problem associated with all this is the "non Q" posts that are automatically tied to Q for having a 4chan/8kun/whatever other site you want layout that are just LARPs. Q has never given an ultimatum or said a certain thing WILL happen at a PRECISE time. I am not arguing for or against it, but recent events (the past year and a half or so) have led me to believe there may be some weight to the whole Q theory

8
Tokens_Worth 8 points ago +9 / -1

https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/watch/ultimate-proofs-volume-1_RjkUEgZxIjBplPp.html

Every Q hater needs to spend 2 hours trying to debunk this.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Tokens_Worth 1 point ago +2 / -1

rat Sessions

Awww you fell for the theatre, like the Bannon theatre... kek

7
bubble_bursts 7 points ago +8 / -1

Q is definitely not a LARPer, but doesnt mean he is Omniscient, or everything he said would come true. But he is in the know and at the deepest level.

4
GnosticAwakening 4 points ago +4 / -0

Q seems like an intelligent and well researched patriot & truth seeker. Basically a professional conspiracy researcher. I envision a civilian at a battle station in his basement.

My only complaint about the movement is over reliance on an unknown entity. Otherwise, the movement is genius.

2
Ms_deplorable 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is exactly my thoughts. I think Q is real, in a sense. I think Q is group of several people with security clearances. However, the drops are by their nature, extremely prone to larping.

As time went on, I’ve come to the conclusion that Q is an IIA. In other words, a professional alphabet agency LARP. It’s lulled a huge chunk of the patriot movement into inaction by repeatedly promising that “patriots are in control”.

3
tiredofwinning2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

What gets me is if Q isn’t real at all... why does the MSM give it any merit by mentioning it at all??? They are scared and that’s a clear indication that there is some truth to it all.

3
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 3 points ago +3 / -0

The globe has been warming since the last ice age, and according to Al Gore I was supposed to be underwater here for 7 years by now.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
SmokinSpkeas 2 points ago +2 / -0

I literally did the math. Long, long ago. The claim that storms will be stronger is based on atmospheric mass. All you have to do is see how much carbon dioxide and methane is being added to the the atmosphere vs the total atmosphere's current total mass and you can see that the change is like 1% in 12,000 years.

Obviously, I do not remember the exact numbers, but that is close.

The total parts per million is more immediate. Nothing like the cambrian explosion which brought an abundance of life, but we could see some increase in global temperature. To what extent?

From what I could deduce at the time, looked like a 1000+ year problem. Organic technological growth should solve the problem in conservatively 150 years.

It is fabrication.

2
VoterIDMatters 2 points ago +2 / -0

ive followed q since december 2017 and found it to be, at worst, a psyop designed to activate the contingent of conservative-leaning conspiracy-minded apathetic non-voters into becoming avid trump supporters.

Meanwhile, it has linked interesting source material, from bureaucratic organizational flow charts to near-comprehensive lists of all elected and appointed federal, state, and local government officials who have been convicted of child sex crimes.

In my opinion its done more good than harm.

2
NeilNewsNetwork [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

i agree with this

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-1
Independenceforever -1 points ago +2 / -3

PSA:

Nothing on Q is new or original.

Not sure why people don't know this. Other people did the research. Not Q.

And while they report many factual things, they report plenty things wrong.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +4 / -6
2
NeilNewsNetwork [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even though i am not a Q person, anyone who is a pede and a patriot, is my fren

whether they are a Q person or not

there are crazier theories held by Democrats (things like the global warming hoax, the fine people hoax, that there isn't voter fraud, or that bill clinton isn't a rapist)

more of them believe that nonsense, but the Q thing is only in the news because the left uses it as a tool against Trump

the best solution is to not let the media tell you who is crazy (because they are the truly crazy ones)

2
tdwin_throawayasanon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've seen redpill articles and other open source info on here that were literally just posted by Q that same day, which thousands upon thousands of people here read and spread. Do you honestly think Q has been damaging to Trump by pointing millions of people in the direction of actual impactful government corruption that Trump has been fighting?

C'mon, man!

-5
CollinsportJunkie -5 points ago +4 / -9

Tired of hearing about this fake Q crap.

2
NeilNewsNetwork [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

my point was neither to defend nor attack Q

My point is that its weird that the media chose this one thing to attack so mercilessly, all while ignoring many other theories that are provably false