Innocent explanation could be that someone mis-attributed these votes to Trump and then fixed their mistake. We don't know that this glitch was malicious, but it needs to be explained.
This is a direct raw data source from the Edison aggregator and I can't image who would have the authority there to change those values...that leaves the source voting machine or its interface with the data company as the place where a discrepancy emerges.
The Dominion system is the machine that automatically scans the ballots and tallies the vote totals and mistakes by staff or otherwise is not going to result in a vote total changing after the reporting interval but before.
Once it is reported how do they retract data in the report, and who has the authority in the Dominion or local poll worker staff to do that?
The chain of custody is easy to find out, but the real question to ask is who has the proper chain of command to correct 'mistakes' in that custody and how do we prevent mistakes from becoming abuses?
Can I suggest an alternative theory that is more realistic to me as an IT guy? Here goes:
I don't believe the news networks are deleting their election night streams, because they are hiding vote rigging by Dominion. Could be, but unlikely.
A more realistic thing to hide would be if some central Dominion machines were connected to the internet and were providing a direct raw feed of tabulated numbers to the aggregator that the news networks used.
Imagine if someone actually fucked up, caught their mistake, switched votes over and the reason you can see it in the data is because the datastream was coming straight from the Dominion machines and not going through the proper channels.
I worked as a journalist for two years and if I was doing a livestream of election results, I would totally ask for this kind of access even knowing that I was going to get a "no, this could be illegal" reply, just for the possibility of getting results earlier than everyone else.
Innocent explanation could be that someone mis-attributed these votes to Trump and then fixed their mistake. We don't know that this glitch was malicious, but it needs to be explained.
There's nothing innocent, when you look at the spreadsheet, the only way to rig an election on the fly is to use fractional math to re-assign votes.
His tabulation shows it clearly as does this video https://youtu.be/Fob-AGgZn44?t=4
This is a direct raw data source from the Edison aggregator and I can't image who would have the authority there to change those values...that leaves the source voting machine or its interface with the data company as the place where a discrepancy emerges.
The Dominion system is the machine that automatically scans the ballots and tallies the vote totals and mistakes by staff or otherwise is not going to result in a vote total changing after the reporting interval but before.
Once it is reported how do they retract data in the report, and who has the authority in the Dominion or local poll worker staff to do that?
The chain of custody is easy to find out, but the real question to ask is who has the proper chain of command to correct 'mistakes' in that custody and how do we prevent mistakes from becoming abuses?
Can I suggest an alternative theory that is more realistic to me as an IT guy? Here goes:
I don't believe the news networks are deleting their election night streams, because they are hiding vote rigging by Dominion. Could be, but unlikely.
A more realistic thing to hide would be if some central Dominion machines were connected to the internet and were providing a direct raw feed of tabulated numbers to the aggregator that the news networks used.
Imagine if someone actually fucked up, caught their mistake, switched votes over and the reason you can see it in the data is because the datastream was coming straight from the Dominion machines and not going through the proper channels.
I worked as a journalist for two years and if I was doing a livestream of election results, I would totally ask for this kind of access even knowing that I was going to get a "no, this could be illegal" reply, just for the possibility of getting results earlier than everyone else.