tl;dr - in the raw voter logs it seems we can use the "date last changed" to know when PA received the ballot. There are MANY THOUSANDS of votes which were received after 11/3. In the PA system they are ALL marked "last vote date" 11/3. But their "date last changed" reveals when the vote was actually physically received.
This might not be huge - but its nice to have our OWN numbers and OWN data so they cant just bullshit us.
LOOKING AT ALL THE RAW PA VOTER LOGS
- 11/04 : 493,184 ballots
- 11/05 : 317,110 ballots
- 11/06 : 172,628 ballots
TOTAL : 982,922 BALLOTS RECEIVED AFTER 11/3
[how I counted this at the bottom]
And of course Team Trump might want to throw out all ballots received AFTER 11/3.
And of course PA might claim they cant tell who is who.
But their voter log does show this info in the "date last changed" column.
-
this of course does not indicate when they were post marked
-
and who knows if they lied about some of the "received dates" (ie came in on 7th but they back date it in system)
==HOW EXTENDING MAIL IN DATE TO 6TH DOUBLE FUCKED PA CHEATERS==
[ note : this only matters if we can get judge to throw out all ballots received after 3rd ]
PA cheaters thought that the 6th was the last cut off date. So even if the back dated they prolly put the 4th, 5th or 6th since they thought it was "legal"
So in trying to cheat and extend 3 days they actually did us a favor because we can now ID all late ballots (after 3rd).
If the cut off would have been the 3rd they could have back dated them all to the 3rd and itd make it impossible to see what is what.
==MORE INFO ON HOW TO SEE "LAST CHANGE DATE" IS SAME AS BALLOT RECEIVE DATE==
A pede has linked us this
https://www.pavoterservices.pa.gov/pages/ballottracking.aspx
- Online / Absentee ballot tracking
I do a test lookup for WILLIAM THOMPSON county DAUPHIN with dob 01/12/1922
- PA voter roll says he voted on 11/3
this is because that is when they OFFICIALLY count ballots
but in the voter logs it says "last change date" was 10/28/2020
USING THE SITE ABOVE we can see this is the date they RECEIVED the ballot
Not all votes can be looked up in this tool. I tested with several other names and each time if the record is found the web site "Ballot Received" date matches the voter log "date last changed" data.
screen shot from voter log
screen shot from web site
==HOW I COUNTED THIS==
I am on linux and have all PA county files in 1 folder.
Then I do this command
grep 11/04/2020 * | wc -l
This scans all files (*) for 11/04 then the wc -l command counts the lines matched.
This command searches all files and dumps the matches into a different file
grep 11/05/2020 * > pa-nov-5.txt
screen shot for the nerds showing commands and results and counties.
all data scrapped from the logs someone dropped on TD recently.
log data dump - https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8Sjcj1V/happening-a-user-just-purchased-/
missing head info - https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8SlshNq/
zip here
size : 60.60 MB
3 files
pa-nov-6.txt
pa-nov-5.txt
pa-nov-4.txt
if my theory is correct and "last change date" in voter log is also "ballot receive date" then we know exactly the names of the people who votes were counted after 11/3
Yes you do. That’s on the data dump right? But how did they vote? Unable to be sure since the envelope is the only way to tell the persons ballot. It was planned all along not to be able to trace the mail ballot to the person sending it. These fuckers are crafty and have been at this for decades.
Don't we know how all the batches of votes voted as the totals changed through day and time? To the hour and minute?
Of course, but in the United States and in most countries, the "secret ballot" is sacred, so that we cannot ever be coerced to vote a certain way under fear that some authority is looking at who we voted for and could hold that against us.
And so in the mail in voting process, ballots are sent in envelopes that are obviously linked to the voter.
Upon receipt, the poll worker verifies that that ballot was postmarked and received in time to be a legally cast ballot.
The poll worker verifies that the signatures match the voter rolls on the envelope. Once all that work is done, the poll worker then removes the ACTUAL ballot from the envelope, and places the ballot, with your votes but with no other personally identifying information linked to you, into the queue to be counted / tallied.
From that point forward, there is no way to link the ballot with the voter.
Then it would seem like what you need is a way to postmark a ballot, and not an envelope.
Just spitballing here... If the outer envelope had a cutout where the postage is placed where the corner of the ballot was exposed, the USPS automated sorting machine would postmark on the folded ballot inside instead of the envelope (which contains the voter's name and signature). Doing it this way would ensure secrecy of the ballot as there is no voter identifying info on the actual ballot. (Wanna get rich? Get a patent on an envelope with a window cut out for the postage/postmark in the corner, similar to those envelopes that have windows for the addressed recipient)
Or, you could just require in-person voting and all of these problems go away. :)
Hence the mad dash on Election Day to secretly get them all separated from the envelops without any oversight.
Great work on this, Pede! Trump supporters are the smartest and hardest working people in our country. You are doing God's work.
up till 5am riding adrenaline rush, alarm clock at 9am. not thrilled lol!
Correct.
most likely, you could produce a graph showing there was a constant ration of Trump/Republican to Dem/Biden votes until a certain time, at which point it spiked to a massive Biden/Trump ratio, and that this change off occurred after the 3rd, and then use that to show the original ratio needs to be assumed as what the non fraudulent total/count would have been.
I think this is at least somewhat possible to backdate