7544
Comments (345)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
124
randomusename 124 points ago +124 / -0

If you are going to help with a recount, body cams should be thought about. Going forward they should be thought of as essential equipment for a poll watcher.

110
Madman2020 110 points ago +110 / -0

These counting rooms should be set up with Casino level surveillance. 4K cameras everywhere. Totally open for anyone to watch it online.

51
Barracuda 51 points ago +51 / -0

Totally. Im surprised not one of the state election official thought of this. If these officials are bitching about mUh cOvId and require all this distancing then this would've have been a perfect way to monitor the tallies. Of course this would've gotten them a free slot on candid camera so of course they didnt want that.

What I also find suprising is under what law did these officers enforce removing poll watchers. Sounds like multiple lawsuits can be filed here. IANAL. I'm sorry, but they sound more like hired thugs to me and I come from a family full of law enforcement.

28
LibDestroyer50000 28 points ago +28 / -0

They aren't worried about lawsuits, right now it's "get rid of Trump, at any cost" mode for them.

20
johnqpublic864 20 points ago +20 / -0

They don't want cameras. That makes cheating a lot more difficult.

24
CheckorHold 24 points ago +24 / -0

Just like Epstein's prison cell that miraculously shuts off when 'he necks himself'.

13
Darkheartisland 13 points ago +13 / -0

Plus the code for any software used in the election should be open.

3
OconusLurex 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed. Open source software (in addition to machines being only used for counting, requiring all machines used be manufactured in the US, and not be connected to internet) was one of the measures put forward a few years ago in Gabbard's 'SAFE' election integrity legislation that no one in congress seemed to want to touch with a 10 ft pole (especially fellow Dems- for obvious reasons.)

3
Darkheartisland 3 points ago +3 / -0

That should have passed with bipartisan support.

5
RoofKorean 5 points ago +5 / -0

And just like the good old days, cheaters get escorted to the back to get taught a lesson in stealing.

3
litux 3 points ago +3 / -0

But that would also make absentee ballots not confidential. At that point, you could vote by putting your ballot on your website or social media.

3
randomusename 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not a real concern as by nature they aren't confidential due to the verification needed on them even if its just a signature match.

16
airgag 16 points ago +16 / -0

Consider streaming body cams so they can't remove the footage by stealing the cam.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
Tallsie 4 points ago +4 / -0

That would be amazing. We could spend the election evening watching counters in districts acting as an internet linked chaotic legion detecting voter fraud. /pol would be the best location to host such footage.

6
litux 6 points ago +6 / -0

It would make elections more transparent, that's for sure.

On the other hand, votes (especially mail-in and absemtee ballots) would no longer be confidential if there was footage of envelopes and ballots available.

4
OconusLurex 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mail-ins should not be allowed anyway; they aren't legal in just about every other country. The absentee system, in which people have to request a ballot far in advance, supply a good reason such as a diplomatic, military, or other job overseas, would yield a small enough amount of ballots that another system could be used to verify them without exposing the individuals' identities. It wouldn't be like mail-in ballots, where they can just swamp the system in unverifiable, fraudulent bullshit.

4
EndHumanTrafficking2 4 points ago +4 / -0

This should be the top comment.