The point remains that it will be slow and subjective and a small(er) number of votes compared to the hacked tabulation machines. Hand recount is what we need NOW. If the state flips based on hand recount next week and proves dominion voting machines are the main source of fraud, its game over.
You’re assuming that all the ballots are good. They’re not all good. You hand count the same illegal ballots. You end up with the same count. And also I heard (though I hope I’m wrong) that this “recount” isn’t a full recount, but instead will only require a count of a “statistically significant number of ballots” to draw a conclusion about the larger , current “count”
Try "a few thousand at least."
The point remains that it will be slow and subjective and a small(er) number of votes compared to the hacked tabulation machines. Hand recount is what we need NOW. If the state flips based on hand recount next week and proves dominion voting machines are the main source of fraud, its game over.
You’re assuming that all the ballots are good. They’re not all good. You hand count the same illegal ballots. You end up with the same count. And also I heard (though I hope I’m wrong) that this “recount” isn’t a full recount, but instead will only require a count of a “statistically significant number of ballots” to draw a conclusion about the larger , current “count”
Sounds pretty suspect and bs to me.