413
Comments (35)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
14
zanonks [S] 14 points ago +14 / -0

Update: New post on Nebraska here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8cBUnxd/ne-2nd-congressional-algorithmic/c/

Video of current findings at: https://rumble.com/vb2yet-virginia-algorithmic-fraud-preliminary-findings.html At this point, I've got precinct level data for virginia and nebraska and am planning to see if I can figure out a better pattern to how/if any votes are being stolen from the smaller & heavily republican areas. I've driven through rural America enough to know that it seems pretty unlikely that so many of these rural counties could like the president 5 or 10 points less than the other republicans.

4
muslimporn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can you give the formula for each axis?

If Y is the percent of independent votes Trump got minus the proportion of straight republican votes he got then this graph is just Y = -X.

Look at this...

http://fooplot.com/#W3sidHlwZSI6MCwiZXEiOiJ4JTcteCUzIiwiY29sb3IiOiIjMDAwMDAwIn0seyJ0eXBlIjowLCJlcSI6Ii14IiwiY29sb3IiOiIjMDAwMDAwIn0seyJ0eXBlIjowLCJlcSI6Iih4JTcteCUzKS14IiwiY29sb3IiOiIjMDAwMDAwIn0seyJ0eXBlIjowLCJlcSI6IjAiLCJjb2xvciI6IiMwMDAwMDAifSx7InR5cGUiOjEwMDAsIndpbmRvdyI6WyItNjAuMTgwODAxMTI0NTcyNjciLCI5MS4xNTkxMTcyNTA0NDI0MiIsIi00Ni42NzQ3MzY3ODExMjAyNyIsIjQ2LjQ1NzUyMDY4MDQyNzQ3Il0sInNob3dncmlkIjowLCJzaG93YXhlcyI6MCwic2hvd2xhYmVscyI6MH1d

Dr Shiva shows in his slide that Y = F(?) - X.

Please see a detailed explanation here...

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8c4hnss/x/c/1BjYaPNPlM

If people would actually provide the data and formulas used then people can correct them or verify them.

Tomorrow the liberals will be checking the working out and undermining legitimate fraud concerns showing the working out for this particular case being wrong. Sometimes this happens by accident but they will also be deliberately trying to poison the well with noise as well basically stuffing junk into the foundations that can't support the weight of the building built upon it. We need to source the best building materials. Not anything that anyone conveniently comes in and provides on a silver platter, too easy. Watch out for traps.

Don't feel bad, it took me a while to notice this as well and it's usually my job to do that.

Also in that thread I posted look at my methodology trying to simulate and reproduce a result. That's a very important skill and technique that I hope other Science Pede's will take up to empower us. You can skip some of the maths that way just trying it and seeing how it turns out.

I don't have easy access to all the data but sharing analytical skills is crucial. Just being able to run a plot like this is also really useful. Sharing is caring. Skill dump is as vital as any other effort. I can teach coal miners to code but PhD students and journalists are a lost cause.

4
zanonks [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

All data is from Virginia's official site: https://results.elections.virginia.gov/vaelections/2020%20November%20General/Site/Presidential.html

My calculations from that information are in this file: https://ufile.io/912fxt4m

I have good evidence this method works in Nebraska as well.

1
muslimporn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shiva socials people by choosing people with hyper symmetrical faces that we automatically trust. My face is like a crooked chimney. I love the guy, I worked with a lot of Indians like him but you have to understand in their culture its a different language, it's all showmanship and being stolid. Even if you're decent you have to do that there to get ahead and no one likes to morally quibble because otherwise you doom not only yourself but those around you and you have to do what you have to do to get ahead.

Regardless remember that teacher who said for you what the assignment has to be to be a CS? I'm CS. I don't lower the standard because I am lonely, it is lonely though.

I've got to respect Benny Smith and Dr Shiva for their trickery. I like it to be honest. This is what we need. We are superior because of our humility and they tested it. They made us stronger and more immune to trickery. If we can detect theirs we pass, we're better than them and that's what you need to better the dems. We can detect that of the dems. We cannot then we fail any test and if we fail that we fail the dems and what hope do we have to pass the test from he who is God if we can't pass those of those who think they're God? They are agents of God even though as an atheist I don't believe in it testing our worth.

Anyway the cheating methods of the left isn't that easy to detect. They work below the detection threshold on purpose. We need to up our game. If we could not detect such an easy fraud they provided us then who are we? Are we worthy enough to detect the fraud of our enemy?

I know it's daunting but you have me on your side and I have you on my side. They're making it difficult as can be. Challenge accepted.

2
zanonks [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll publish easier to review of my whole process when done with Nebraska

1
zanonks [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

New post is here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8cBUnxd/ne-2nd-congressional-algorithmic/c/

I included a download to the python code. This is same method I used for Virginia but cleaned up quite a bit. Can you review?