this still makes no sense to me, wouldn't ticket splitters reduce in absolute numbers the more republican a preccinct is in total volume? independent and democrat ticket splitters going more for trump then an ever more declining republicn splitter group deviating from him
the y-axis is relative to straight republican. if you watch the video i posted, it shows in virginia what a bunch of counties where the algorithm wasn't running look like. For example Henrico and Virginia Beach show no signs of the algorithm.
This is pointing out that the "volume" of republicans choosing to vote against the president follows a linear pattern of growth as the precincts become more republican in select counties.
The linear pattern is the problem not that some republicans split tickets.
In the rumble video, I show at least a dozen counties where the republicans went against the president, but it wasn't in a linear pattern.
This info raises suspicion into those counties. It sure looks like software was used to systematically take votes away from the president in places that they would be less likely to be missed.
Yes it would, but this is showing that you are proportionality more likely to be a ticket splitter if you live in a republican neighborhood. That is straight line nature is what is being disputed with this analysis.
this still makes no sense to me, wouldn't ticket splitters reduce in absolute numbers the more republican a preccinct is in total volume? independent and democrat ticket splitters going more for trump then an ever more declining republicn splitter group deviating from him
the y-axis is relative to straight republican. if you watch the video i posted, it shows in virginia what a bunch of counties where the algorithm wasn't running look like. For example Henrico and Virginia Beach show no signs of the algorithm.
Dr. Shiva explains 20 minutes into the video here: http://thesaker.is/dr-shiva-live-mit-phd-analysis-of-michigan-votes-reveals-unfortunate-truth-of-u-s-voting-systems/
he doesnt account for volume of ticket splitters this looks like it does not
This is pointing out that the "volume" of republicans choosing to vote against the president follows a linear pattern of growth as the precincts become more republican in select counties.
The linear pattern is the problem not that some republicans split tickets.
In the rumble video, I show at least a dozen counties where the republicans went against the president, but it wasn't in a linear pattern.
This info raises suspicion into those counties. It sure looks like software was used to systematically take votes away from the president in places that they would be less likely to be missed.
Yes it would, but this is showing that you are proportionality more likely to be a ticket splitter if you live in a republican neighborhood. That is straight line nature is what is being disputed with this analysis.