Shiva socials people by choosing people with hyper symmetrical faces that we automatically trust. My face is like a crooked chimney. I love the guy, I worked with a lot of Indians like him but you have to understand in their culture its a different language, it's all showmanship and being stolid. Even if you're decent you have to do that there to get ahead and no one likes to morally quibble because otherwise you doom not only yourself but those around you and you have to do what you have to do to get ahead.
Regardless remember that teacher who said for you what the assignment has to be to be a CS? I'm CS. I don't lower the standard because I am lonely, it is lonely though.
I've got to respect Benny Smith and Dr Shiva for their trickery. I like it to be honest. This is what we need. We are superior because of our humility and they tested it. They made us stronger and more immune to trickery. If we can detect theirs we pass, we're better than them and that's what you need to better the dems. We can detect that of the dems. We cannot then we fail any test and if we fail that we fail the dems and what hope do we have to pass the test from he who is God if we can't pass those of those who think they're God? They are agents of God even though as an atheist I don't believe in it testing our worth.
Anyway the cheating methods of the left isn't that easy to detect. They work below the detection threshold on purpose. We need to up our game. If we could not detect such an easy fraud they provided us then who are we? Are we worthy enough to detect the fraud of our enemy?
I know it's daunting but you have me on your side and I have you on my side. They're making it difficult as can be. Challenge accepted.
presdifffromparty = presperformance - partyprecinctperf // y = n - x
precinctinfo['precinctrep'] = partyprecinctperf // x
...
jsondict['x'] = precinctinfo['precinctrep'] // x
jsondict['y'] = presdifffromparty // y
Looks like the same problem.
Instead try...
jsondict['y'] = presperformance
I could probably give some indentation / whitespace and naming advice but not really critical.
Just stuff like...
[ precinct.get('precinct')]
Should be...
[precinct.get('precinct')]
And a lot of inconsistency. I usually set my IDE to show white space and tabs. It looks as though at least two people worked on this or parts were copies in or multiple editors were used. I see double spaces, then quad spaces, then tabs.
Consider using _ to separate words in variable names. For example bunchofwordssquashedtogether is not particularly easy on the eye.
I'll look at it closer tomorrow to understand exactly what these colums are and how to properly put them to use (full define them so I know exactly how they relate to what's on ballot, maybe dig around for a ballot image too). Saying that it looks like individual names so it's a bit different. I guess the concept of straight R is in the code. Names don't have party but I can google it. I'll probably just plot all the candidates performance first.
Note that this data is limited you may not be able to detect fraud with it even if these is fraud.
Ha! Hopefully you're on the right side of the Balmer curve.
I had my editor crash in the middle and switched so that's probably the spacing issue. I was also copying from the VA work. That was even dirtier because I got it wrong so many times before it worked and I'm doing this on the side of my job.
Also, take a look at the pure numbers in a spreadsheet from the state. For the counties this method has said there was shenanigans and you'll see the trend by looking at Trump vs. the worst of the Senate/House candidate in each precinct. That's how I originally figured out.
All data is from Virginia's official site: https://results.elections.virginia.gov/vaelections/2020%20November%20General/Site/Presidential.html
My calculations from that information are in this file: https://ufile.io/912fxt4m
I have good evidence this method works in Nebraska as well.
Shiva socials people by choosing people with hyper symmetrical faces that we automatically trust. My face is like a crooked chimney. I love the guy, I worked with a lot of Indians like him but you have to understand in their culture its a different language, it's all showmanship and being stolid. Even if you're decent you have to do that there to get ahead and no one likes to morally quibble because otherwise you doom not only yourself but those around you and you have to do what you have to do to get ahead.
Regardless remember that teacher who said for you what the assignment has to be to be a CS? I'm CS. I don't lower the standard because I am lonely, it is lonely though.
I've got to respect Benny Smith and Dr Shiva for their trickery. I like it to be honest. This is what we need. We are superior because of our humility and they tested it. They made us stronger and more immune to trickery. If we can detect theirs we pass, we're better than them and that's what you need to better the dems. We can detect that of the dems. We cannot then we fail any test and if we fail that we fail the dems and what hope do we have to pass the test from he who is God if we can't pass those of those who think they're God? They are agents of God even though as an atheist I don't believe in it testing our worth.
Anyway the cheating methods of the left isn't that easy to detect. They work below the detection threshold on purpose. We need to up our game. If we could not detect such an easy fraud they provided us then who are we? Are we worthy enough to detect the fraud of our enemy?
I know it's daunting but you have me on your side and I have you on my side. They're making it difficult as can be. Challenge accepted.
I'll publish easier to review of my whole process when done with Nebraska
New post is here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8cBUnxd/ne-2nd-congressional-algorithmic/c/
I included a download to the python code. This is same method I used for Virginia but cleaned up quite a bit. Can you review?
I'm a bit drunk but...
...
Looks like the same problem.
Instead try...
I could probably give some indentation / whitespace and naming advice but not really critical.
Just stuff like...
Should be...
And a lot of inconsistency. I usually set my IDE to show white space and tabs. It looks as though at least two people worked on this or parts were copies in or multiple editors were used. I see double spaces, then quad spaces, then tabs.
Consider using _ to separate words in variable names. For example bunchofwordssquashedtogether is not particularly easy on the eye.
I'll look at it closer tomorrow to understand exactly what these colums are and how to properly put them to use (full define them so I know exactly how they relate to what's on ballot, maybe dig around for a ballot image too). Saying that it looks like individual names so it's a bit different. I guess the concept of straight R is in the code. Names don't have party but I can google it. I'll probably just plot all the candidates performance first.
Note that this data is limited you may not be able to detect fraud with it even if these is fraud.
Ha! Hopefully you're on the right side of the Balmer curve.
I had my editor crash in the middle and switched so that's probably the spacing issue. I was also copying from the VA work. That was even dirtier because I got it wrong so many times before it worked and I'm doing this on the side of my job.
FYI, i was able to get New Hampshire data and it doesnt show anything.
https://rumble.com/vb4c2b-new-hampshire-by-precinct.html
Also, take a look at the pure numbers in a spreadsheet from the state. For the counties this method has said there was shenanigans and you'll see the trend by looking at Trump vs. the worst of the Senate/House candidate in each precinct. That's how I originally figured out.