Havent heard of that but they admit they let homeless vote without ID.

And to challenge voter residency eligibility (From rossi v gregoire, the 2006 case i mentioned earlier) you need to either

A- Know their true address, like some random poll watcher will know the true address of any ineligible people who are voting

B follow the 5 steps of

1. Send a postmarked letter with a return envelope to the address (Good luck doing that to an intersection like homeless are putting as their address)
2. physically go to the location
3. check phone records, LOL
4. check property records, yeah dont know how to check the property records for a tent in the woods 5.searching the statewide voter registration database, which will not likely turn anything up for Mr. Burnout living under the pier

And you need to do that with every challenged voter, and you have until 45 days from the election to do it all.

No wonder WA went from a neck and neck purple state where the governors race was decided by 100 votes to a solid blue stronghold immediately after that decision.

https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1245&context=wmlr

^ The part im talking about starts on page 11. Read how the court ruled on that and tell me our SC isnt fucking retarded.

“Welp, the republicans didn’t prove conclusively that the voters didnt actually live at their registered address, even though they did prove that the registered address was in fact a P.O box.”

When I tell people that they think im exaggerating. Its that unbelievable.