3949
Comments (137)
sorted by:
203
Zizou005 [S] 203 points ago +204 / -1

Lin Wood is fighting hard for his home state of Georgia and the United States Constitution. love it

123
kekkk 123 points ago +125 / -2

We need more Lin Woods honestly.

This guy is a stone cold Patriot.

45
Histrionic_Answer 45 points ago +45 / -0

True. Instead the people of Georgia are stuck with RINO Governor Kemp. The GOP is swamp through and through.

30
williammcfadden 30 points ago +30 / -0

The GOP is finished in Georgia if they lose this.

6
Garfield24096 6 points ago +8 / -2

The dude is in Hollywoods pocket fuck him

98
pizza_lawyer 98 points ago +99 / -1

Oh yeah! War room mentioned this very settlement agreement during their show this morning and demanded someone do something about it.

20
Kozio_ 20 points ago +20 / -0

What was the consent agreement about? What violations?

26
RedWhiteandPew 26 points ago +26 / -0

Sec of State and Board of Elections were sued by DEM party in FEBUARY! to make clerks and election officials seek a committee agreement to reject an absentee ballot, and then give them (voters) many ways / more time to rectify it.

Really what this did was to make clerks complacent. It was hard to get the committee agreement, so L Woods lawsuit alleges the clerks simply rubberstamped them rather than rejecting.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ta0rze1m3flzk5o/2020-11-13%20Complaint%20-%20L.%20Wood%20v.%20Raffensperger%20et%20al.pdf?dl=0

They adopted the Dem party language from the lawsuit without repub or GA Gen Assembly input. This is illegal.

February - they were scheming mail in fraud while telling us to visit Chinatown and continue on our cruises amd travel plans.

13
Kongol626 13 points ago +13 / -0

What does this really mean? Anyone with a ELI5

41
meteorknife 41 points ago +41 / -0

They're going to use the same argument being used in Pennsylvania. The secretary of state changed the election process without legislation. Now they're going to challenge that.

13
RedWhiteandPew 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yes. Sec of State and Board of Elections were sued by DEM party in FEBUARY! to make clerks and election officials seek a committee agreement to reject an absentee ballot, and then give them (voters) many ways / more time to rectify it.

Really what this did was to make clerks complacent. It was hard to get the committee agreement, so L Woods lawsuit alleges the clerks simply rubberstamped them rather than rejecting.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ta0rze1m3flzk5o/2020-11-13%20Complaint%20-%20L.%20Wood%20v.%20Raffensperger%20et%20al.pdf?dl=0

They adopted the Dem party language from the lawsuit without repub or GA Gen Assembly input. This is illegal.

February - they were scheming mail in fraud while telling us to visit Chinatown and continue on our cruises amd travel plans.

9
Kongol626 9 points ago +9 / -0

Right but what did GA change. I know PA changed the rules of the game but I'm not aware of what GA did.

22
FightTheSWAMP 22 points ago +22 / -0

The defendants in GA changed their process for handling absentee ballots. They did so without approval from the Georgia General Assembly

8
Composers_For_Trump 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ballot signature validation process for mail in voting

4
RandiRoo 4 points ago +4 / -0

I believe Georgia won't let the auditors verify the ballot signatures

7
FergieJR 7 points ago +7 / -0

Also looking for an ELI5

22
Centipedealicious 22 points ago +22 / -0

Basically argues that only legislature can set voting procedure. The Secretary of State, not part of the legislature, settled a Democrat lawsuit agreeing to different ballot checking procedures than those set by legislature. Argument is that any ballots affected should be thrown out.

8
komenos_9 8 points ago +8 / -0

The fact that elected legislature officials are being circumvented is what makes all of us feel like slaves!!! The citizens of Georgia voted for their legislature representatives, who were bipassed by the Dems and the corrupt Dominion Lobby crony "I got covid, I'ma sit this recount out even if negative", POS, Rino, Secretary of State Rafflesburger!

93
FollowTheLight 93 points ago +93 / -0

I think Trumps Team are going about this calmly and methodically to make legal cases so that it cannot be said that they are trying to subvert the election. You either have laws that are followed or you don't. It may seem boring right now, but as long as everyone holds true it will probably be a home run. Meanwhile the Rally tomorrow will bring big color to the idea that no one has conceded. The world of instant noodles comes to a screeching halt. Yay!

28
boony_ 28 points ago +28 / -0

I like instant noodles, but only the Korean ones. Fuck CCP and China

20
fasterth 20 points ago +20 / -0

Japanese people are based too and japanese women embrace their feminity, unlike the leftist, gender-fluid, artificially-colored, mad-marxist land-whales we have here.

6
FuckYouAsWell 6 points ago +6 / -0

Based noodle merchants

2
BillDStrong 2 points ago +2 / -0

Japan itself has some pretty cool customs. When a couple marry, and the wife stays home, the husbands salary automatically increases at the company he works for.

1
thingaboutarsenal 1 point ago +1 / -0

While I agree and think some of the hottest women I've ever seen are in Tokyo, you'll see some true freaks in Harajuku and Roppongi.

9
GBA4ever 9 points ago +9 / -0

Two small things I’ve done is sent my letter to the White House as the President has requested demanding a full audit of all 50 states. Every registered voter needs to send one. Also added an Election Fraud sign out front as my neighbor did.

3
pizza_lawyer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Where can I get an election fraud sign?

3
GBA4ever 3 points ago +3 / -0

Home made. Although I’m sure there is someone selling them online.

3
Trump2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

Know what you can't buy on the internet? Fucking porcupines!

2
GBA4ever 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just saw they are up at Trumps online store.👍🏻

4
K-Harbour 4 points ago +5 / -1

How many will be in DC?

A few thousand?

2
Trump2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

A lotta thousands! Bigly yuuuuge!

2
memtndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love the rally. But they should be rallying at the state capitols of those who are trying to ruin their election process. Not the white house.

2
Voltage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did that last week.

2
memtndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Were there protests for an actual audit in GA?

2
Voltage 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not in GA nor am I able to go to DC but I will be again and my state capital tomorrow.

2
memtndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good.

-8
deleted -8 points ago +1 / -9
1
Composers_For_Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

No they have not you fucking retard

59
elsabio 59 points ago +59 / -0

This the sort of kick the fucking door down shit we need; git 'er done!

55
deleted 55 points ago +55 / -0
22
Mavdick96 22 points ago +22 / -0

And is Kyle Rittenhouse's lawyer.

6
AmericanGuy 6 points ago +7 / -1

Sadly that's a state case, not a federal case (so I heard).

7
Trump2024 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ok, he was the lawyer for Richard Jewel. The one they tried to pin the Olympic bombing on. Federal bigly yuge win.

-5
flashersenpai -5 points ago +1 / -6

I wouldn't use that as a good example. Wood doesn't seem to know much about criminal cases.

2
Mavdick96 2 points ago +2 / -0

What kind of wood? Oak, birch, pine, honey locust? What we talking?

14
Litehouse 14 points ago +14 / -0

And won the Richard Jewel case against the FBI. He knows how to fight the big guns

And won Nick Sandman vs. NBC

31
lasTRUMPcard 31 points ago +31 / -0

This is good. Patriots everywhere are holding the line and pushing back.

28
Trumper007 28 points ago +29 / -1

Yeah Lin Wood is a litigator.

24
maaagggaaa 24 points ago +24 / -0

“Stay tuned” regarding the servers in Germany

https://twitter.com/llinwood/status/1327365171891810306?s=21

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
TotesNotKaren 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s certainly interesting! I would kill for 4chan to actually not be a LARP for once.

23
kekNation 23 points ago +23 / -0

From a quick review of the Complaint:

Woods argues that:

  1. Federal Law gives authority to write election laws to the state legislators.

  2. State Legislators cannot delegate this authority to officers or appointees.

  3. State law had clear, efficient, and sufficient processes for dealing with ballots.

  4. Certain non legislators (Sec of State, I think) entered into an agreement that changed these rules.

  5. Sec of State lacked required authority to make these changes.

  6. The changes were cumbersome and likely prevent effective handling of defective ballots (state law says if no signature, signatures don’t match, etc you mark defective, note reason defective and notify the voter. New rule is if you see defective ballot you have to get three more officials to review and agree it is defective and go through additional steps. This makes it less likely bad ballots are rejected.

  7. These changes were done without proper authority and without valid reason and therefore are improper.

In my opinion, this argument was structured in such a way to give a clear path to appeal to SCOTUS because Wood began by establishing Federal Jurisdiction over State’s Authority in controlling their election procedures. So, if GA Supreme Court says “we think it was okay for voting laws to be changed by a body other than the GA legislators”, Wood can appeal to SCOTUS because the requirement of State legislators making the rules is in the Constitution.

Edit: I misread; this is filed in Federal Court. They skipped state courts all together.

This might invalidate any of certification of vote.

10
2018ExecutiveOrder 10 points ago +10 / -0

I gave up on georgia after that sham of an audit, looks like this could change things.

This sounds similar to what pa did, no? Where SOS didn't have authority regarding election law

12
kekNation 12 points ago +12 / -0

HOLD THE LINE PEDE.

I think this one is far more important than it initially might seem.

Several states had changes implemented by non legislators. The Constitution requires there be done by each state’s legislative bodies.

PA already had a judge uphold unconstitutionality of a rule on similar complaint.

The more states where citizens bring these claims the greater the motivation for SCOTUS to hear a case on this issue.

From another of my replies: IMPORTANT POINT: this is very similar to the case that Trump won in PA earlier this week. It was a small rule that was kicked out by the PA courts but it established that the legislature alone has authority to make those changes.

If GA rejects his claim it gives more reason for SCOTUS to weigh in (when various states/Fed districts have different holdings SCOTUS gives final ruling).

6
2018ExecutiveOrder 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fantastic news, was absolutely demoralized today

7
Trump2024 7 points ago +7 / -0

Never give up! We are all here to lift each other up. We got this pede!

3
CLaRGe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seriously, when you get demoralized: stop consuming every other media source and come to TheDonald and sort by HOT or RISING. Our courage, excitement, and good cheer will get see us through the waiting.

2
zaowood 2 points ago +2 / -0

They (legacy media, pedowood, degenocrats, etc.) are working hard to demoralize all patriots. Unfortunately for them, nobody is watching their content any more!

9
kekNation 9 points ago +9 / -0

From another of my replies:

IMPORTANT POINT: this is very similar to the case that Trump won in PA earlier this week. It was a small rule that was kicked out by the PA courts but it established that the legislature alone has authority to make those changes.

If GA rejects his claim it gives more reason for SCOTUS to weigh in (when various states/Fed districts have different holdings SCOTUS gives final ruling).

5
Centipedealicious 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good summary, but this is a federal action, not state action.

4
kekNation 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh shit. You’re right. For some reason I thought he was starting in state court

3
Centipedealicious 3 points ago +3 / -0

👍👍

3
Centipedealicious 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also, just need majority of three to throw it out, not all three.

3
kekNation 3 points ago +3 / -0

I might have to move off Iphone and actually read this damn thing.

Two of three still allows the scenarios where you have overseers who are squelching the initial ballot inspectors.

What do you think the ultimate aim if this suit is? To me it looks like either A) get SCOTUS to kick out all BS rules these states implemented while preparing for the steal or, B) rejecting of these rules invalidates any certification until proper count is done

3
GreatFunana 3 points ago +3 / -0

The goal is A. The democrats overstepped their bounds and team Maga want this shit shut down on a federal level. They win A, they can apply this to all states.

Democrats are playing the vote game. IE the votes that count. Trump's team is playing the high game: let's shut down these BS rules that led to statistically impossible vote counts.

2
Centipedealicious 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that’s correct.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
TwoStar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah it was SoS and election officals who were gettting sued by a group of Democrat party organizations. SoS agreed to change rules as a settlement to that suit (which they didn't have authority to do).

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Voltage 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I'm not mistaken it is in the Constitution of the USA. It's also I believe it also says that the legislature can't pass this duty on to anyone or other body.

1
TwoStar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Generally they try to rule narrowly. I can't imagine them saying "every case of this across the country invalidates mail-in ballots." However, if they rule in time, people could use that as a basis to sue in other states. I'm not a lawyer.

3
kekNation 3 points ago +3 / -0

Democratic Party of GA, and several Smaller Democratic entities.

It was basically a handful of complicit groups establishing the rules by which they would cheat.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
17
ClarenceBeeks 17 points ago +17 / -0

Exactly right. We did not agree to the terms of this election. And they had no legal right to alter the terms. I do not accept this election as legitimate on that fact alone.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
6
MrWWonka 6 points ago +6 / -0

gotta work up the chain, itl get there!

1
Centipedealicious 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a federal action.

15
CovefefeREEEE 15 points ago +15 / -0

Lin Wood.

Rudy Giuliani.

Fighters.

14
Right_of_Sinner 14 points ago +14 / -0

Mr Wood: SCORCHED EARTH THIS MOTHER FUCKER

11
Arkful773 11 points ago +12 / -1

🚨🚨🚨. EMAIL BLAST COPY AND PASTE TO GEORGIA GOP LEADERS 🚨🚨🚨

Paste the emails below into your TO field in Email. Then, copy the subject and the body and paste and you're ready to go - Just Remember to Sign with Your Name, Phone, & Address. EVEN IF YOU'RE NOT FROM GA, do it! But forward to GA friends too! MODIFY LETTER AS YOU SEE FIT!)  

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],  

  DEMAND A FULL AUDIT OF GEORGIA VOTE – NOTE JUST A RECOUNT -- EXPOSE THE FRAUD. TRUMP WON GEORGIA. PLEASE ASK GOVERNOR KEMP TO STEP UP TOO!   Dear Georgia State Legislator,   As an American Citizen and one of the 73 Million+ Avid Supporters of President Donald Trump, I am appalled and disgusted by the Blatant Election Corruption and Fraud from the State of Georgia which turned a Massive Trump Victory into a fraudulent Biden margin.  The many, many instances of fake ballots, late ballots, ballots from dead people, fake Water Main Breaks, and software "glitches" likely swung hundreds of thousands of votes from President Trump to the corrupt Biden and the Democrats.  We are counting on YOU to take leadership and investigate, expose, and reverse this situation, along with your governor. The future of the United States depends on Fair, Free Elections without Fraud.  Georgia will be looked upon as a third world banana republic if you don't fix this!!  As a fellow American and Patriot, I implore you to do so for the sake of our great nation! We will never have a legitimate election again if YOU Don’t Fix this!!!

6
K-Harbour 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ahhhh...time would be better spent emailing all of them to have the legislature declare the election non-competent and appoint their electors.

Get to the end game —- get Trump his rightful electors.

11
verum-teller 11 points ago +11 / -0

Stacey Abrams is doing a terrible job as governor down here.

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

lul

10
cannoli9116 10 points ago +10 / -0

They infiltrated Georgia right underneath our noses. We will expose them all.

6
DrCowboyPresident 6 points ago +6 / -0

Atlanta has been a hive of shit for a long time. They've been building to this.

7
Brillica 7 points ago +7 / -0

In a fair and just world this would be a slam dunk, per the text and referenced laws. GA Legislature is responsible for election law, GA SoS made their own rules in consultation with only one political party. Either throw out the mail-in ballots, or have them properly verified before certifying the vote.

3
TwoStar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, that part seems very clear. I liked the case law cited as well. I don't know what I don't know, and that's the part I;m nervous about.

Glad to see this filed and really glad Trump isn't fighting on his own.

6
TrumpTrainChoooChoo2 6 points ago +6 / -0

GET EM LIN!

5
terablelizard 5 points ago +5 / -0

Does this mean that all of GA's results get thrown out if Lin Wood wins?

3
TwoStar 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's hard to say, there is a wide spectrum of "remedy". It makes sense that all absentee ballots that weren't handled in accordance with the actual law be thrown out.

I read his whole filing and think it was well constructed. I'm not a lawyer - I'm concerned that he claims the absentee process was "disparate" but I didn't see an argument for that aspect, and I don't know how much is necessary to show that he has been damage (it must not be much becase he didn't touch it.)

2
Centipedealicious 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. Only defective mail-in ballots.

3
keepwinning 3 points ago +3 / -0

because it did.

suck it COFRAUD-19

3
Juzeza 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’sa big fucking claim

3
Staatssicherheit 3 points ago +3 / -0

While working as a security guard during the 1992 Olympics in Atlanta, Richard Jewell discovered a backpack containing three pipe bombs. He alerted police and helped evacuate the area before the bomb exploded, saving many people from injury or death. Initially hailed by the media as a hero, the FBI leaked information the media stating Jewell was a suspect.

After he was dropped as a suspect, Jewell with Attorney Lin Wood filed libel suits against the FBI, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, NBC and CNN.

CNN settled Jewell's libel suit for an undisclosed monetary amount. NBC agreed to pay Jewell $500,000.

In 1997, the FBI revealed that four FBI special agents in its Atlanta office were told they might face “possible disciplinary charges” for their roles in the Jewell case. The four were accused of “poor judgment” but not criminal wrongdoing. The four were identified as Woody Johnson, Atlanta Office Head, his deputy, AB Llewellyn and Special Agents Diader Rosario and Don Johnson.

2
Filetsmignon 2 points ago +5 / -3

I read the filing. I'm no lawyer but it seems like really grasping at straws. Essentially Lin is saying that the law set forth by the Georgia Legislature says an election clerk who determines that a ballot is defective (not signed, signature doesn't match, etc.) is to SOLELY reject the ballot. But the Georgia Secretary of State office issued guidance earlier this year stating that if a clerk determines a ballot is defective (for any of the same reasons above) they must "get 2 other clerks to review" and if any one of them determines it's in fact defective then it's rejected. His argument is that this new 3 person decision committee is not the proper procedure since the GA SoS has no authority to make such rules (only the GA Legislature does). Lin is asking for all mail-in ballots to be invalidated because they were reviewed under this 3 person committee guidance which is unlawful. I'm not sure it'll go anywhere, but we'll see.

9
DJTrump_MD 9 points ago +9 / -0

Seems legit argument to me

6
GreatFunana 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is the argument made in PA that won. Its the same basis, the Secretary of State has no authority to change the rules of an election, only the legislature.

They won the case in PA mind you with this argument.

Basically the dominoes are being setup for another Bush V Gore to throw out the votes that came after November 3rd because they are changing the standard without legislative authority to do so.

1
Filetsmignon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the PA argument is stronger. But I hope this case in GA is successful too.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
2
GreatFunana 2 points ago +2 / -0

I never said they WON PA numbnuts. I said they won, and an educated Pede who read the thread would compare to the case in question to the PA case since this thread was discussing the case in GA, and the only case that has been won was the case in PA. Also the second line specifically states:

They won the case in PA mind you with this argument.

I'm glad you're not in politics because reading between the lines and actual study of documentation is not your strong suit. And marking things in bold is clear call for attention. Jesus, could you look like a 4 year old with ADHD more by doing that? Cut it out.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Composers_For_Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

The secretary of state cannot over rule the legislature, that is how they got a good ruling yesterday in PA on one case

0
Kongol626 0 points ago +1 / -1

Correct. But that case was not won because of this reason. Please link me why that case won. It clearly wasn't because she overstepped her boundaries. This will be ruled in our other case

4
kekNation 4 points ago +4 / -0

You missed a point. If you reject a ballot under the law you contact the voter (who can then correct their ballot) so those votes are not all lost.

Under the new scheme you have the requirement three people agree it is defective. There were mass ballots being brought in and the people reviewing the ballots were picked by democrat officials. So, now you have “supervisors” there so that anytime an honest person sees a bad ballot they can’t mark it, they raise their hand and the “supervisors come over and say “nope, this one is fine”.

I believe the Trump campaign’s team has affidavits to this effect. They do not need to be included in this filing as Wood is attempting to win one very specific point; the rules cannot be changed by anyone other than legislature.

If GA Courts agree with Wood, these votes get redone. If they reject his Claim but SCOTUS hears case and Wood wins, then this applies to all states.

IMPORTANT POINT: this is very similar to the case that Trump won in PA earlier this week. It was a small rule that was kicked out by the PA courts but it established that the legislature alone has authority to make those changes.

If GA rejects his claim it gives more reason for SCOTUS to weigh in (when various states/Fed districts have different holdings SCOTUS gives final ruling).

3
Centipedealicious 3 points ago +3 / -0

Two things: this is already in federal court, not state court; don’t need all three, just two out of three.

3
TwoStar 3 points ago +3 / -0

They made the procedure so tedious it wasn't used at all, which effectively diesnfranchised legitimate voters.

I saw other data that in a normal year 3% of such ballots are rejected and this year it was a fraction of a percent - that is evidence to support the claim.

2
Centipedealicious 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your analysis is wrong. You stated that if any one of the three determine it is invalid... however under the agreement, 2 out of three (majority) must determine it is bad in order to throw it out. Much different standard and, therefore, better court argument then what you stated.

2
Filetsmignon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I stand corrected. Thank you.

2
SkeletorsTeeth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hell yeah! Give us wood!

2
daty_dato 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did Kemp get some backdoor deal? There is NO chance he gets reelected being so indifferent to the cause.

2
CLaRGe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wat?

Could someone please break this down for those in Rio Linda?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
mickusa1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fucking top KEK right there pedes...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
wernerziegler 1 point ago +1 / -0

Glad to know he's doing something other than tweeting all day. Excellent to know he's fighting in his home state.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Centipedealicious 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is good stuff. Well written and looks like on solid legal ground.

1
debacle 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does this mean in laymans' terms?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ReaganRevolution 1 point ago +1 / -0

Praying this results in something legit because up to now all we've witnessed is a lot of talk.

1
ChynaBiden 1 point ago +1 / -0

God I love Lin Wood!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ConservativeMom03 1 point ago +1 / -0

Awesome... and Now there's definitive legal precedent from Pennsylvania that only the legislature is able to make or alter election rules.

1
Izzil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most consent decrees are the result of friendly collusive lawsuits. Municipalities do it all the time because muni law doesn’t allow the city council to take certain actions and collusive lawsuits is how to get around it: “Shucks. What could we do? We got sued.”

1
Jalapepeno 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this lawsuit is not ruled in our favor, can the decision be appealed?

1
Centipedealicious 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes.

1
Muttsbitetoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Be Lin Wood.