1279
Comments (62)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
10
ClarenceBeeks 10 points ago +10 / -0

Honestly, if these numbers are confirmed then this is definitive proof of vote manipulation.

Even if there is some kind of natural correlation between the blue and orange points (like popularity per district) you'd never see this much matching detail. There are 134 points and not one of them bucks the trend of the opposing color. If the orange goes up, the blue goes up, etc. In a natural distribution there would be lots of point where 1 goes up and 1 goes down.... at least a little. This is manipulated by humans or machine.

I assume 51 is PHI. They couldn't drop by 40% because his Elec Day was only 28% or so

1
ClarenceBeeks 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 40% thing is interesting for sure. But I think they are missing the bigger red flag which is the consistency of the up/down pattern between the blue and orange. Totally impossible. I believe the mail in ballot percentage is actually much higher and they are trimming it down to be roughly 40% below which forces the patterns to always match

2
ClarenceBeeks 2 points ago +2 / -0

So in each district the odds of the blue following the trend of the orange would be 50/50 that the trend line would follow. To get every point in the series it would be .5 to the 67th. Is this right? That shit did not happen