if you're a rich producer you can easily go find a desolate place somewhere in the middle of nowhere and listen to the birds.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,early on during the takeover that is. once its full fledged you will be a producer for the state....its a good thing WE THE PEOPLE will never allow that to happen here even if we were currently heading down that slope.
The Pentagon Envisions a Horrible and Dystopian Metropolis of the Future
A Special Operations Command video outlines a nihilistic and bleak future for big cities around the globe – and describes why fighting in them may be a non-starter.
"The US’ response to Agenda 21 has been tepid, at best. President GHW Bush signed on to the plan; then President Bill Clinton created the President’s Commission on Sustainable Development. The Commission produced a study and some meetings, and closed for business in 1999.
President GW Bush was less enthusiastic about sustainability, but he issued executive order 13423, encouraging green technology for the sprawling federal real estate portfolio.
Enter President Obama, who last June handed Agenda 21 issues to the Department of Agriculture by signing executive order 13575, creating the White House Rural Council. Designed to help rural areas, anti-Agenda-21 types insist the Council is part of a plan to depopulate the countryside until everyone is living in those prison-like cities. They even have what they call a map of the result.."
In the middle of rereading this right now. If you haven't read this or any of Rands' work, I suggest doing so. It is a hefty book, with more narrative than might have been needed, but spot on none the less. She lived through the red revolution, and it's chilling to read some of the statements made and not think that it is exactly what antifa, AoC, or any dipshit mindless leftist would say right now.
If pressed for time I suggest reading, For the New Intellectual, it's a compressed run down of her philosophy of Objectivism with the main messages from most of her work included.
I don’t necessarily agree with all of Rand’s points on her objectivist philosophy, mainly her views that pure greed is a virtue and that altruism is not. However, she was definitely red-pilled (free thinker), anti-Communist, anti-state and hardcore libertarian. For me, her stuff is quintessential to the Libertarian’s library, right up there with Ron Paul, Milton Friedman, Aldous Huxley, Orwell, Sowell, Goldwater, and the Austrian Economists Mises and Rothbard.
Absolutely, that's the thing that we get and leftists don't. It is possible to support someone but not entirely agree with that person. It's about taking aspects of different view points to form the bigger picture of things. No one man can be 100% right, maybe 50%, 30%, 90%? It's about taking in information and properly evaluating it for yourself.
I’ve felt that way about the unabomber ever since I read all his work. Did terrible stuff. Deserved his fate. Was absolutely spot on though on just about everything he wrote.
“There is a difference between our strike and all those you’ve practiced for centuries: our strike consists, not of making demands, but of granting them. We are evil, according to your morality. We have chosen not to harm you any longer. We are useless, according to your economics. We have chosen not to exploit you any longer. We are dangerous and to be shackled, according to your politics. We have chosen not to endanger you, nor to wear the shackles any longer. We are only an illusion, according to your philosophy. We have chosen not to blind you any longer and have left you free to face reality—the reality you wanted, the world as you see it now, a world without mind.
“We have granted you everything you demanded of us, we who had always been the givers, but have only now understood it. We have no demands to present to you, no terms to bargain about, no compromise to reach. You have nothing to offer us. We do not need you.
It's a fine story, but since when do they just let you walk away?
if you're a rich producer you can easily go find a desolate place somewhere in the middle of nowhere and listen to the birds.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,early on during the takeover that is. once its full fledged you will be a producer for the state....its a good thing WE THE PEOPLE will never allow that to happen here even if we were currently heading down that slope.
Agenda 21 sez no.
Thanks pede. Gave me some new reading material, much appreciated.
Related:
Oct 14, 2016
The Pentagon Envisions a Horrible and Dystopian Metropolis of the Future A Special Operations Command video outlines a nihilistic and bleak future for big cities around the globe – and describes why fighting in them may be a non-starter.
https://youtu.be/gEPdOZbyzbw
¿Was ist das?
End rural and suburban living.
Thanks pede. Gave me some new reading material, much appreciated
https://www.un.org/humansecurity/agenda-2030/
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-reinbach/agenda-21-sustainability-_b_1523118.html?ncid
Worth reading the entire article.
"The US’ response to Agenda 21 has been tepid, at best. President GHW Bush signed on to the plan; then President Bill Clinton created the President’s Commission on Sustainable Development. The Commission produced a study and some meetings, and closed for business in 1999.
President GW Bush was less enthusiastic about sustainability, but he issued executive order 13423, encouraging green technology for the sprawling federal real estate portfolio.
Enter President Obama, who last June handed Agenda 21 issues to the Department of Agriculture by signing executive order 13575, creating the White House Rural Council. Designed to help rural areas, anti-Agenda-21 types insist the Council is part of a plan to depopulate the countryside until everyone is living in those prison-like cities. They even have what they call a map of the result.."
I want to go to the Alpha site that hosted the "disappeared" capitalists.
Some of us pay attention to patterns, where the truth remains.
In the book, eventually they forbade people from quitting their jobs or changing jobs.
In the middle of rereading this right now. If you haven't read this or any of Rands' work, I suggest doing so. It is a hefty book, with more narrative than might have been needed, but spot on none the less. She lived through the red revolution, and it's chilling to read some of the statements made and not think that it is exactly what antifa, AoC, or any dipshit mindless leftist would say right now.
If pressed for time I suggest reading, For the New Intellectual, it's a compressed run down of her philosophy of Objectivism with the main messages from most of her work included.
I don’t necessarily agree with all of Rand’s points on her objectivist philosophy, mainly her views that pure greed is a virtue and that altruism is not. However, she was definitely red-pilled (free thinker), anti-Communist, anti-state and hardcore libertarian. For me, her stuff is quintessential to the Libertarian’s library, right up there with Ron Paul, Milton Friedman, Aldous Huxley, Orwell, Sowell, Goldwater, and the Austrian Economists Mises and Rothbard.
Absolutely, that's the thing that we get and leftists don't. It is possible to support someone but not entirely agree with that person. It's about taking aspects of different view points to form the bigger picture of things. No one man can be 100% right, maybe 50%, 30%, 90%? It's about taking in information and properly evaluating it for yourself.
I’ve felt that way about the unabomber ever since I read all his work. Did terrible stuff. Deserved his fate. Was absolutely spot on though on just about everything he wrote.
This is John Galt Speaking
https://youtu.be/2SL0nFAIUiE
https://amberandchaos.net/?page_id=73
Wyatts Torch. They way it should be when they come for us.
Thank you, I love that book!