846
Comments (31)
sorted by:
19
whatnameisnttaken 19 points ago +19 / -0

Your lips to Gods ears...

16
MyNewToy 16 points ago +16 / -0

No they are not. They are going to decide if some of the votes were lawful are not.

5
You_Aint_Black 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah this is what’s going to happen. What indication is there that they can or would call for an audit?

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
5
VoteBlaster2000 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are layers of certification

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
Knowbody 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm certain the people doing the counting will still try to pull off fuckery even after SCOTUS rulings.

They already don't give a fuck about breaking the law.

6
LessSwampMoreMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

How do you identify fake ballots that have been mixed in with others?

I would think if officials have poisoned the well you would either have to toss the votes from that county or have a new election.

This is the part I don’t understand how they separate the rules for the presidential election from local positions. How can you say the results stands for all these other races in that district but the presidential race was invalid.

1
trump2036 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah, ballots already separated from the envelops. And in some areas the envelops already destroyed (illegal).

If you can't hold a fair and valid election, your election results should be tossed. Otherwise its rewarding illegal activity and profiting from it.

5
VoteBlaster2000 5 points ago +5 / -0

Watch the Dan Bongino show 11/13/20 with guests Jenna Ellis and Rudy. It explains how this might play out.

5
Spongebob1808 5 points ago +5 / -0

And look how screwed up the recount is in GA?

4
BowelSharpton 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm STILL confused - does a recount/audit apply only to PHYSICAL ballots? Haven't several thousand already been "accidentally" destroyed, like with hammers, fire, shredder....? Gee, how convenient.

3
vote_for_MAGA_2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh, SCOTUS has ruled that a full audit is happening? Link?

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
3
vote_for_MAGA_2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh. Well your post said “SCOTUS is going to grant a FULL AUDIT” which implied that someone knew something or said something about it.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
1
vote_for_MAGA_2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I know the evidence is clear. But you’re forgetting about the “deep state” factor.

And your post still implies SCOTUS is definitely going to rule on this even though nothing has been nothing.

3
CandyBarr 3 points ago +3 / -0

Please add VIRGINA

Heck add the whole United States

2
TranquilityBased 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hope this is true

2
Geeee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are they though?

2
Haz85 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have we got time for this shit?

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
thekindlyman555 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Fraudulent mail in ballots may not be identifiable though as the signature and voter information is on the envelope and the ballot is anonymous once separated from the envelope.

So even if you can identify fraudulent signatures, back-dated postmarkings, or other illegal ballots, we have no idea who those ballots voted for because they've become anonymous and mixed in with all the other ballots (hopefully divided into some form of lot/batch system but I have no idea how that works...

This is especially a problem in PA where observers were not allowed in during the envelope verification stage so Trump's legal team is pushing to invalidate ALL ballots that were counted without proper observation.

1
JwPATX 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it should be done for all 50 states. I bet their quadrennial “we won the popular vote,” has been bullshit for at least 20 years.

1
GodzillaTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only PA is going to be before SCOTUS currently....i doubt they will rule on states methods etc that are not before them.

1
Shakakka99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends on who does the audit. Look at Georgia.

1
Carbum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cool... we need pedes doing the audit..

Not the same clowns

1
dougf 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do care about exposing electoral fraud and i do care about Trump remaining President. BUT, I still support DJT, President or not. He deserves my support and he will have it going forward, no matter what happens or what he chooses to do. He has proven that he is a great President and a great man. Not perhaps winning a fixed race doesn't change that at all.

1
Itateeverybody 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly we don't need an audit if they toss late mail in instead. That will essentially give us the totals from when the polls closed. Thats why they are going for the 14rth amendment argument.