All the coincidental errrors going one direction, physically blocking access to only Republican poll watchers, mystery after deadline ballot dumps, fake water main breaking, pausing counting in all swing states at the same time, secret ballot counting at 1am, and smoking gun data analysis points to only one conclusion: obviously this was the most secure election in history. That's what antifa advocate Coomer said and he has no reason to lie.
So President Trump had over 2,000 again? Even with the cheating? LOL...
Ironically, I also saw he did better in the highest Covid case counties in the USA which would seem impossible considering the 24/7 negative ads. No way he lost. Not even close.
He “won” by turning deep blue cities into fraudulent vote factories and running them nonstop for a week. Plus whatever fuckery the foreign voting systems put in place
Obama had genuine enthusiasm in 2008, so I wasn’t surprised that he won. Biden had zero enthusiasm and got about 10m more votes? That I refuse to believe.
Sounds like it's time to do a deep dive of % turnout in counties won by going, at least, as far back as 2008. Population shifts will naturally affect the #'s but proportions will shed some light on potential fuckery. I know this election is pretty fresh so the bean counters haven't done a full autopsy but all the hand waving explanations and refusal to post historical trends/numbers when pushed on bizarre data points in 2020 is... interesting.
What group of people was Biden talking to when he said:
“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”
Not necessarily. I mean, personally, on an emotional level, I'd love for cities to have no say in how the country is run, as their culture is so counter to the vast majority of the culture. What is good for a city is often horrendous for farmland or even small towns, and sometimes vice-versa.
Right now, a city being able to overrule the entire state is an atrocious arrangement. If they were cut into city-states, they could then have their own rules for themselves without affecting others, and they could still have a representative voice in the country without overpowering everyone around them, no need for any constitutional issues.
What might make this work even better would be to have a sort of parallel hierarchy, where "city-states" confer amongst themselves to have a "lesser senate", "lesser president", and "lesser house" that rule over the city-states (since they tend towards wanting more government). That way they get their independent structure/laws, with the same three-way safeties, without forcing themselves on everyone else. The only clashes would be where actual House/Senate/Prez rulings override the "lesser" ones, but we already have structures of this sort set up so that individual states can rule differently if not challenged.
It would need talking through. I'm certtainly not going to be able to come up with a solution, but they do clearly desire separate treatment, that's just the first thing I thought of.
Everything about the left is FAKE!
All the coincidental errrors going one direction, physically blocking access to only Republican poll watchers, mystery after deadline ballot dumps, fake water main breaking, pausing counting in all swing states at the same time, secret ballot counting at 1am, and smoking gun data analysis points to only one conclusion: obviously this was the most secure election in history. That's what antifa advocate Coomer said and he has no reason to lie.
Naturally projection is normal for the left
Keep pushing logic to break the propaganda. Also the memes.
So President Trump had over 2,000 again? Even with the cheating? LOL...
Ironically, I also saw he did better in the highest Covid case counties in the USA which would seem impossible considering the 24/7 negative ads. No way he lost. Not even close.
Can you give link to the 477 number?
thanks
Search "counties won biden 2020". Top result brookings inst. BTW, Hillary lost with 472 counties.
Done: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2020/11/09/biden-voting-counties-equal-70-of-americas-economy-what-does-this-mean-for-the-nations-political-economic-divide/
More like blue curtain. Like in the wizard of oz. Pull it back.
He “won” by turning deep blue cities into fraudulent vote factories and running them nonstop for a week. Plus whatever fuckery the foreign voting systems put in place
SHAM ELECTION!
FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD!
You have 90% turnout in minority areas when minorities historically have the lowest voter registration and voting numbers.
The secret ingredient is crime
Sounds kinda like Obama had a dominion assist as well.
Obama had genuine enthusiasm in 2008, so I wasn’t surprised that he won. Biden had zero enthusiasm and got about 10m more votes? That I refuse to believe.
Sounds like it's time to do a deep dive of % turnout in counties won by going, at least, as far back as 2008. Population shifts will naturally affect the #'s but proportions will shed some light on potential fuckery. I know this election is pretty fresh so the bean counters haven't done a full autopsy but all the hand waving explanations and refusal to post historical trends/numbers when pushed on bizarre data points in 2020 is... interesting.
What group of people was Biden talking to when he said:
28 million more people live in cities in 2020 compared to 2008. 1.3 million fewer people live outside cities in 2020 compared to 2008.
If true, more evidence that cities must be cut out of their states and become their own city-states for the good of the country.
Without senators like DC?
Not necessarily. I mean, personally, on an emotional level, I'd love for cities to have no say in how the country is run, as their culture is so counter to the vast majority of the culture. What is good for a city is often horrendous for farmland or even small towns, and sometimes vice-versa.
Right now, a city being able to overrule the entire state is an atrocious arrangement. If they were cut into city-states, they could then have their own rules for themselves without affecting others, and they could still have a representative voice in the country without overpowering everyone around them, no need for any constitutional issues.
What might make this work even better would be to have a sort of parallel hierarchy, where "city-states" confer amongst themselves to have a "lesser senate", "lesser president", and "lesser house" that rule over the city-states (since they tend towards wanting more government). That way they get their independent structure/laws, with the same three-way safeties, without forcing themselves on everyone else. The only clashes would be where actual House/Senate/Prez rulings override the "lesser" ones, but we already have structures of this sort set up so that individual states can rule differently if not challenged.
So they would have no say in the "actual House/Senate/Prez"?
It would need talking through. I'm certtainly not going to be able to come up with a solution, but they do clearly desire separate treatment, that's just the first thing I thought of.