977
Comments (46)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
HeavyHebrew 1 point ago +1 / -0

We must have read different histories. Two of the greatest impediments to rulers back then were sycophants and unscrupulous ministers. The greatest dangers were not foreign invaders, but restless feudal lords on your own team.

2
Build_the_Narwhal 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess things haven't changed, then. What was the remedy in those days?

2
HeavyHebrew 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not much. You could kill your restive lords, but that risked the rest uniting against you and deposing you and your head. Sycophants really came down to how insecure a lord was. Unscrupulous ministers depended on how well a lords own information gathering capabilities were then the corruption was weighed against the overall effectiveness. Remember, in those days it was expected for people to take their cut.

This is where the Church often came in, and for a brief period, cough early 13th century cough it was almost working. The Church served as a kind of uniting force and a counterbalance, in theory. IN practice, the Church often just became a nother boot on your neck if you were a peasant, another hand in your pocket if you were a merchant, and another restive competing lord if you were a ruler.

1
Build_the_Narwhal 1 point ago +1 / -0

You interest me strangely, Heavy Hebrew (I'm not sure if that means "Serious Yiddish" or "Large Jew"). Any book recs for a complete history noob?