Ignorant take...
It takes an IQ barely above room temperature to understand how bad it would be for us to have some extremist assassinating politicians while we are on the road to legitimately win via the courts.
IF we win legitimately in the courts, that would be an answer to this election, though not one that any of these liberals is going to accept. And that’s a very big IF to begin with.
But what these authoritarian governors are doing is an entirely different matter. It isn’t okay, and they’re not going to stop just because you say they should. They don’t care about the constitution or what their constituents want. I speak from experience, being a resident in Michigan.
Nice IQ insults though. Those are always a big hit.
Well, you're advocating for assassinating politicians on a public internet forum - takes a real galaxy brain to do that... Once our legitimate win is confirmed in the courts, if the leftists refuse to accept it, the military will put them in their place. Your call for preemptive violence is utterly dumb, strategically - it is the wet dream of the elite right now that someone does something that stupid...
More sweet intelligence-based insults. You’ve got a career in this.
But I’m not calling for assassination or violence at all. I merely pointed out that violence and revolution are literally the means whereby this country exist came into existence - because some brave men were willing to do whatever they thought was necessary, risking everything. Don’t forget that.
And also this - your faith in the military seems a little misplaced to me. I’d think they’re just as likely to fire on us as they would be to uphold the law and ensure a fair election result. The upper echelons of the military are suspect at best.
But I absolutely agree that a win through the courts would be infinitely preferable. Let’s hope that’s the way it goes.
Well, if you say things that can be construed as ignorant & then refuse reason, what else is one to assume?
Facts don't care about your feelings...
"The startling results are depicted in the attached Figure. As you can see, nonviolent campaigns have a 53% success rate and only about a 20% rate of complete failure. Things are reversed for violent campaigns, which were only successful 23% of the time, and complete failures about 60% of the time. Violent campaigns succeeded partially in about 10% of cases, again comparing unfavorably to nonviolent campaigns, which resulted in partial successes over 20% of the time."
Those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it. You're playing right into their hands - its been their playbook for the last century...
PS
I must have missed where the founding fathers assassinated the king before dumping tea in the harbor & writing petitions to the king during my studies of history...
Ignorant take... It takes an IQ barely above room temperature to understand how bad it would be for us to have some extremist assassinating politicians while we are on the road to legitimately win via the courts.
IF we win legitimately in the courts, that would be an answer to this election, though not one that any of these liberals is going to accept. And that’s a very big IF to begin with.
But what these authoritarian governors are doing is an entirely different matter. It isn’t okay, and they’re not going to stop just because you say they should. They don’t care about the constitution or what their constituents want. I speak from experience, being a resident in Michigan.
Nice IQ insults though. Those are always a big hit.
Tread on those who tread on you.
Well, you're advocating for assassinating politicians on a public internet forum - takes a real galaxy brain to do that... Once our legitimate win is confirmed in the courts, if the leftists refuse to accept it, the military will put them in their place. Your call for preemptive violence is utterly dumb, strategically - it is the wet dream of the elite right now that someone does something that stupid...
More sweet intelligence-based insults. You’ve got a career in this.
But I’m not calling for assassination or violence at all. I merely pointed out that violence and revolution are literally the means whereby this country exist came into existence - because some brave men were willing to do whatever they thought was necessary, risking everything. Don’t forget that.
And also this - your faith in the military seems a little misplaced to me. I’d think they’re just as likely to fire on us as they would be to uphold the law and ensure a fair election result. The upper echelons of the military are suspect at best.
But I absolutely agree that a win through the courts would be infinitely preferable. Let’s hope that’s the way it goes.
Well, if you say things that can be construed as ignorant & then refuse reason, what else is one to assume?
Facts don't care about your feelings... "The startling results are depicted in the attached Figure. As you can see, nonviolent campaigns have a 53% success rate and only about a 20% rate of complete failure. Things are reversed for violent campaigns, which were only successful 23% of the time, and complete failures about 60% of the time. Violent campaigns succeeded partially in about 10% of cases, again comparing unfavorably to nonviolent campaigns, which resulted in partial successes over 20% of the time."
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sex-murder-and-the-meaning-life/201404/violent-versus-nonviolent-revolutions-which-way-wins
Those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it. You're playing right into their hands - its been their playbook for the last century...
PS I must have missed where the founding fathers assassinated the king before dumping tea in the harbor & writing petitions to the king during my studies of history...