Drip Drip Drip
Ignore the first drip.
Second drip is annoying.
Third one is down right pissing you off.
It sets the stage for the next drip.
What this does is it allows time to validate things. Dot the Ts and cross the Is.
What this does is give those who are on the edge the opportunity to turn themselves in and become informers.
What this does is make it very hard for the votes to be certified...
It’s also one of the ways that federal investigations are conducted. Either they’re dead silent and sweep up everyone at once or you hear about small investigations that culminate in a large public take down at the end.
First option is effective for things like criminal syndicates who don’t hold any political or policing power. Second option is effective for politicians and criminal syndicates who may be able to mount opposition to investigations taking place privately.
Considering the House Oversight committee is a Pelosi appointee who was likely paid off in 2006 to let Smartmatic (Dominion) walk away from an investigation by CFIUS into their ties to Venezuela and never bring it up again when they continued doing business in the US anyway I’d say the second path is more applicable here.
Also, guess who was trying to do business with (Smartmatic (Dominion) at the time in San Francisco? It was Mayor, now Governor, Gavin Newsom who is also... the nephew of Nancy Pelosi.
Drip Drip Drip Ignore the first drip. Second drip is annoying. Third one is down right pissing you off. It sets the stage for the next drip.
What this does is it allows time to validate things. Dot the Ts and cross the Is. What this does is give those who are on the edge the opportunity to turn themselves in and become informers. What this does is make it very hard for the votes to be certified...
It’s also one of the ways that federal investigations are conducted. Either they’re dead silent and sweep up everyone at once or you hear about small investigations that culminate in a large public take down at the end.
First option is effective for things like criminal syndicates who don’t hold any political or policing power. Second option is effective for politicians and criminal syndicates who may be able to mount opposition to investigations taking place privately.
Considering the House Oversight committee is a Pelosi appointee who was likely paid off in 2006 to let Smartmatic (Dominion) walk away from an investigation by CFIUS into their ties to Venezuela and never bring it up again when they continued doing business in the US anyway I’d say the second path is more applicable here.
Also, guess who was trying to do business with (Smartmatic (Dominion) at the time in San Francisco? It was Mayor, now Governor, Gavin Newsom who is also... the nephew of Nancy Pelosi.