Your position is that for many they are the only option, which is retarded.
You're taking a 'firearm-or-nothing' position, which results in you showing up at DC unarmed and bemoaning your position relative to antifa.
I don't need to invent a better defensive option than a firearm, I need to select a better defensive option than literally nothing at all. For which there are many, even excluding firearms. Which is a critical mentality to have given scenarios such as DC
And that's the mentality that leaves you entirely unarmed and at the complete mercy of others. Nice.
"my ideal option is banned, oh well guess I won't consider literally anything else that might help me at all"
Congrats, you're defending a retarded position out of stubborness.
You're making an awful lot of assumptions about my position and have a weird argument. Invent a better weapon, I guess. Good luck with that!
Your position is that for many they are the only option, which is retarded.
You're taking a 'firearm-or-nothing' position, which results in you showing up at DC unarmed and bemoaning your position relative to antifa.
I don't need to invent a better defensive option than a firearm, I need to select a better defensive option than literally nothing at all. For which there are many, even excluding firearms. Which is a critical mentality to have given scenarios such as DC
ok chief.