6011
posted ago by TrumanBlack ago by TrumanBlack +6014 / -3

WE ARE CALLING FOR:

Someone who could run a Benford Law analysis of all our completed research.

Lawyers to join our legal team and help present our work in a way that's admisible in court so we can give the big guy a free pass to jail with a ribbon on top.

PEDES EXPERTS IN WEB DEVELOPMENT SO THE WHOLE WORLD CAN SEE THE FRAUD.

WE ARE CALLING FOR; Data Scientists, Mathematicians, Statisticians! CRITICAL IF YOU CAN DO SIGNAL ANALYSIS. [MOAB]

CRITICAL: ANY PEDE THAT CAN HELP US GET ACCESS TO MORE DATABASES. GET IN CONTACT WITH ME

🚨🚨🚨HELP US FIND HOW MANY DEAD, UNDERAGE, ILEGAL, MARRIED PEOPLE [INCLUDING COVID DEATHS] DEMOCRATS FUCKED UP AND STOLE A VOTE FROM.🚨🚨🚨

PM ME. [WITH YOUR EXPERIENCE]

🚨🚨🚨WE ARE SO CLOSE AND WHEN WE DROP OUR BOMB IT WILL BE THE SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD🚨🚨🚨

Also I just wanna say thank you to everyone upvoting this. You're the ones helping us recruit such a great team!! We have so much brain power here now, such great professionals from all walks of life, people that love this country and have put their lives aside to assists us. I SALUTE YOU BRAVE PEDES. WE WON'T LET THEM TAKE OUR COUNTRY AWAY FROM US!!!!

Comments (359)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
BadBoyCornPop 3 points ago +3 / -0

I need help now

I have no time to look at this in the next few days.

I have been looking at Dr. Shiva's plots and McIntyre's similar plot here:

https://twitter.com/ClimateAudit/status/1326905529160126464

and have done something similar in C#, but using a proprietary IDE (sorry)

Code is here:

https://pastebin.com/TUWevCuC

spez: data here: www.climateaudit.info/data/election/MI_Oakland-2020.csv

data derived from data here: https://results.enr.clarityelections.com//MI/Oakland/105840/269402/reports/detailxls.zip

What I think I have done:

  1. Read McIntyre's csv file
  2. Created a PCA (Principal Component Analysis) using the columns MixElectionD, MixElectionR, StrElectionD, StrElectionR, divided by TotVotesTotal
  3. Added PC1-4 to each record
  4. Ordered the results by PC1
  5. Plotted the 4 columns a) raw b) scaled by TotVotesTotal

These are the resulting plots (similar to those from Shiva/McIntyre);

https://i.maga.host/yFXlJpj.png https://i.maga.host/mpZiLe7.png

PC1 is, roughly, how democrat or republican a precinct has voted.

The relationships for StrElectionD, StrElectionR, MixElectionR fit intuition and are roughly in same ordering of PC1.

MixElectionD makes no sense. This shows no visible relationship with how democrat or republican the other votes are.

I need help to know:

  • have I messed up in implementation? (I do not know stats and have never used the library used to compute PC1)

  • have I messed up in interpretation?

  • how would this look with other data?

  • wtf is MixElectionR/MixElectionD anyway

  • MixElectionD - Are these Biden only ballots?

Has anyone else been looking at this?

Spez2:

I have also plotted the results ordered by PC2, which seems to be, roughly, MixElectionD / TotVotesTotal.

https://i.maga.host/q8O2VkA.png

Hope I'm not fooling myself - based stat pede is having a look now - thanks!

2
HOLE 2 points ago +2 / -0

MixElectionD is a non-straight party ticket. Here in MI, you can mark a box stating that you want all partisan offices for one party. I believe MixElectionD means the person voted for Biden and then proceeded to fill in the rest of the ballot, perhaps some Republican.