5518
Comments (126)
sorted by:
118
zteollie 118 points ago +121 / -3

Shit this is huge, share this everywhere!

92
2020REBOUND [S] 92 points ago +92 / -0

Somehow this very simple but very easy and blatant shit was missed over all the number and code crunching..

40 Dominion machines running the same ballots 10 times multiplying Biden votes by 10.
No hacks needed.

57
GEOTUSRocks 57 points ago +57 / -0 (edited)

I posed a similar question...

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8SluLbu/why-is-a-vice-president-for-domi/c/

The red flag is why have they scrubbed his information.

27
crusty_curmudgeon 27 points ago +27 / -0

Great work there, patriot

-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
9
CloakAndDagger 9 points ago +9 / -0

DEPORT

18
prospektor 18 points ago +18 / -0

But it's also easily proven by having a hand recount. If there's only 100 ballots instead of 1000, it's utterly, totally obvious. I really don't know if they are this dumb. I mean, I wish they were, but they are in this game for a long time now.

7
emeraldcity 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well but if you do it enough so the vote isn't close then there is no recount, and they don't seem to allow independent audits either. Hence why there is NO EVIDENCE.

But it can be proven with the statistics. There is a record of how many absentee ballots were issued, and there is a record of how many absentee ballots were accepted. If you look at the overall totals for a state you get very high turnout. If you look at smaller areas / precincts then you might get over 100% turnout for some of them. I read something about Milwaukee but I haven't checked personally. This should be enough for an audit of those precincts. Then you just need to look at the physical ballots to see if there are copies in there, or fewer ballots than recorded.

How to get an audit seems to be the problem.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
2020REBOUND [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess they added fake ballots by now.

But easy to see if someone is there in realtime, and why they kept observers out. A 1 by 1 audit of every ballot we sure will see what`s fake.

2
russianbot4673 2 points ago +2 / -0

they mightve got desperate though. it could be true that they had multiple stages of fuckery, hoping that each earlier stage would be enough, but as they saw trump's tallies coming in they kept having to go up to another level of shit, taking more risks as they go.

2
schiff_for_brains 2 points ago +2 / -0

If there are actually hand filled paper ballots to recount.

1
10MeV 1 point ago +1 / -0

Detroit already practiced this in 2016.

"Baxter’s claim is that, when trying to push the ballots through the readers, the ballots would be stuck and they’d have to push them through again thus ‘ACCIDENTALLY’ resulting in a double count. He says the poll workers sometimes ‘FORGET’ to adjust the machine count and instead let the ballot count twice. Of course, that’s completely [ridiculous]! In fact, some votes may have been counted as many as six times.”

https://onenewsnow.com/politics-govt/2016/12/11/detroit-recount-reveals-major-vote-fraud-by-dems

15
Mean_MAGA_Facka 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yes and it's so hard to put a unique identifier (20 digit number/letter combo) on each ballot so that the ballots can't be entered into the system more than once. Every mail carrier in the world adds them to mail/packages for the last 5+ decades for tracking.

It's not a bug, it's a feature.

8
tentonbudgie 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah this could be secure if we wanted it to be

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's impossible after putting a bar code on the ballot for a computer to recognise the same one more than once.

13
Mooma 13 points ago +13 / -0

And then come the fake ballots in unmarked cars through the backdoor, get mixed with the counted votes. They never go to the counting area, and thus dont get caught, they are there to throw off recounts and audits.

12
entropy 12 points ago +12 / -0

This issue of bringing in ballots using unofficial trucks with out-of-state plates was brought up (and dismissed) in the recent Michigan court case. The judge stated it was not odd that they would rent trucks to move ballots and that most of the votes were for Biden because Biden won the election by hundreds of thousands of votes. We should expect more Biden votes. This is the insanity we're dealing with.

They're going to do whatever they can not to recount the ballots in Michigan and then try run down the clock before it can make it to the supreme court.

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Also, the statistics clearly show a huge number of votes, well over a 100, 000 coming in at 93 / 94% for Biden, but reportedly with very few down tickets. It also proves they were counted overnight. Were there any Republican observers? Hands up if you were there overnight. Enquiring minds want to know.

EDIT (actually I looked at the stats in Wisconsin, need to check for Michigan, but pretty sure other people have confirmed it there)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Vegetal 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the ballots are fake, as in printed unofficially, then won't barcodes and serial numbers and watermarks come into play? Why is this so difficult...

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, if they can get an independent audit. Otherwise it will just be lalalala I'm not listening and binoculars are fine for poll watching. Covid-19 and that.

7
Freedombunker 7 points ago +7 / -0

Audits!

5
ZeroDeltaTango 5 points ago +5 / -0

I feel like Trump has enough evidence of fraud to overturn the election.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't want their state implicated in fraud. Which if fraud is subsequently proved, implicates them in fraud.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

so her part in this is apparently done and it's kind of wasting our time talking about it? unless it can go to supreme court. but i'm doubtful trump will try to take too much diminion related stuff there because it gets into the weeds of 'conspiracy' a bit much.. sigh

47
BetsyFreedom85 47 points ago +47 / -0

Mods please sticky this!!

45
2020REBOUND [S] 45 points ago +45 / -0

I keep posting it. It`s the easiest and most blatant evidence. Needs no computer tricks. Just keep move the same ballots 10 times through the scanner.

33
The_Litehaus_Abides 33 points ago +33 / -0

They did the same thing in Detroit in 2016. Remember the Jill Stein recount? (Really Hillary's recount with her lawyers on scene)

Under Michigan law, the recount was stopped when they found a box of ballots marked as 300 votes for Hillary Clinton. They opened the box and there were 30 ballots inside,

Obviously, nothing was ever done to keep this from happening again.

10
Doug 10 points ago +10 / -0

"Penny Crider 2016 recount" search will bring up relevant articles for anyone interested.

4
2020REBOUND [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

I didn`t know that this happened. But it points to it being an open secret that Stein did focus on Michigan back then.

3
Caroigne 3 points ago +3 / -0

She actually had three recounts planned (and funded). She stopped the Michigan one when they were finding Dem-favoring fraud, and then, for absolutely no reason at all, cancelled the other two.

1
2020REBOUND [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

ah interesting I remember it being sold like she was just in for the money and had it stopped to keep it.

Do we have a good source on this 2016 stuff?

3
Caroigne 3 points ago +3 / -0

All I have is remembering from when it happened, sorry.

She found more votes for herself, and more votes for Trump, and fake votes for Hillary, and she just wasn't interested anymore.

It was actually one of my earlier redpills. Yes, I was a bit late.

9
zteollie 9 points ago +9 / -0

Agreed!

2
2020REBOUND [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hi jacking to make connections:
Michigan Vote Dump 15 times higher than usual 4:30 AM!

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8lWXP73/531-am-michigian-vote-dump/c/

So it all fits!

37
Zanesapphire 37 points ago +37 / -0

One of the witnesses mentioned a Ferrari someone was carrying ballots from. Does he own a Ferrari?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
salvecitizen 6 points ago +6 / -0

Good question. Even if not him, it probably belongs to someone interesting. How many Ferraris can there be in the area?

4
elc0 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oakland county is/was one of the wealthiest in the country. It borders Wayne (Detroit.) Relatively, there could be quite a few.

8
Wiggleworm 8 points ago +8 / -0

maybe i'm just ignorant to the specifics, but i've driven around my fair share of nice neighborhoods over the years and yes, i'll see a ton of Land Rovers, Mercedes and Teslas, but even in the wealthiest places, a Ferrari is not common. i could be wrong, but if i were to guess, there's maybe a dozen or so Ferrari's in that entire state and tracking down all the owners shouldn't prove too difficult.

4
salvecitizen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sure, but if an investigator looks over the registrations, he could identify a short list of interesting candidates.

1
TRUMP420KUSH 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are actually a lot of them. Northern Oakland county is very very wealthy. You only really see them in the spring and summer though. There is a Ferrari dealership in West Bloomfield too.

1
tentonbudgie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe, but nobody worth their salt drives anything but a Ford in Bloomfield

25
Chia808 25 points ago +25 / -0

Fuck i hope she's got some protection. That's the most damning evidence I've heard. This is straight up treason.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
4
HanAssholeSolo 4 points ago +4 / -0

I feel like it’s 90% of the way there. Anyone who should be stopping this shit is part of it.

17
0nDaFence 17 points ago +17 / -0

Does he own a Ferrari? Still haven't seen information about who that was.

17
Chia808 17 points ago +17 / -0

This just shows how bad they got beat. Had to take drastic measures.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
11
beef-tits 11 points ago +11 / -0

Sneaky ass haters, thanks for the post fren

11
fponick 11 points ago +11 / -0

Giuliani talked about this evidence and more on his YT channel yesterday. Episode 86. Well worth watching. (Sorry. New device. Still figuring out how to link stuff.)

1
2020REBOUND [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rudy talked about her and the countign of ballots multiple times? This specific way of fraud? If so I will find, watch and make a new video with it.

2
fponick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes indeedy!

1
2020REBOUND [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

thx! It was right 2 minutes in (prompted) https://youtu.be/sd-5Xm5PFmg?t=120 and her affidavit 6 minutes in

1
fponick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great! Share your video with us when it’s done!

8
localhost 8 points ago +8 / -0

Now we need some proof to back up her claims. She needs to present some evidence or this mess will be disregarded immediately as unverifiable hearsay.

2
2020REBOUND [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

She and her affidavit are the evidence. Enough to make a case.

If you see a robbery you can be the evidence to put someone into prison.

2
emeraldcity 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ask to audit the votes as part of discovery.

2
Lovepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Explain to her that she can face felony charges, then see if she will type up an affidavit. If she does, courts will accept it as evidence! And if she's proven to have lied, she does a decade in jail.

7
Grief 7 points ago +7 / -0

Unless they're filing this claim in court it's just another watermark hoax

1
2020REBOUND [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they did as she made an affidavit and they, the accused, also answered to it.

2
Mrsterlock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you link me to where I can see the response?

1
2020REBOUND [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

hers: https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20404633-dominion-contractor-affidavit

response in Michigan court: http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2020/images/11/13/costantino.et.al.v.wayne.boc.et.al.opinionorder.pdf

As I understand they filed in fed court now. Tell me what you thing about it..

6
orange_kek_great 6 points ago +6 / -0

Will anything actually happen to these people though? So far I haven't seen shit.

6
CoderForMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

They rigged the elections in other countries as well with the same software and machines.

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8lUHzS1/dominion-voting-software-front-f/

2
LibDestroyer50000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those were test runs for the big score, a.k.a. the US.

1
2020REBOUND [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

All over the battleground states where they had their people in control.

We need one legally exposed and then all of them fall!

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thinking about this, it might be a good reason to cover it up. If it's true and proven there could be a lot of people annoyed about it. But it's too late.

6
JustInTime2_ 6 points ago +7 / -1

This needs to be stickied,MODS.

5
Mikki 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't know how believable this is. Not saying it's true or false, but I was inclined to believe her up until she named her manager.

She's a temporary contract worker, and her manager is the Vice President of the company? You're telling me there's nobody in the hierarchy between her and the co-owner of Dominion? And the fact that it's a name you can find easily online. It seems like a fib to me, man.

Hopefully it's legit, but I'm not going to go and get my hopes up over something that smells like bullshit.

And if it is true, I don't know how in the absolute fuck this company is running the election in so many states if all you can a ballot more than once. How fucking stupid is that? It's like becoming a millionaire by just repeatedly cashing the same cheque. That seems like it should show it's fabricated too, but quite frankly, I wouldn't be surprised...

2
2020REBOUND [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Co-Owner was RIGHT THERE were the machines were used, physically in place, and she was contracted by him. Nothing unusual about it but the OWNER being right there in corruption central.

It's not like being contracted as facility cleaner at some factory owned by Amazon and Bezos is there discussing dirt in a corner.

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well if you're handed a lot of money to buy the machine / software and you are aware it also helps you get votes, it's not stupid. It is however, corrupt.

1
Lovepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought the ballots had bar codes??

2
emeraldcity 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well I'm confused by this. Whilst I am very dubious there are specific identifying codes, there are definitely supposed to be QR codes, or watermarks of some kind for official ballots. What she, and a video I saw from PBS about Georgia is suggesting is that the machine doesn't recognise that the same ballot / QR code has been entered more than once. Also, it will accept a copy of a genuine ballot. This is mind-blowing. You can just photocopy it apparently. But it should be easy to pick these out in an audit. Either the count will be wrong, or there will be fake ballots / copies.

I would like to know if the voting software has any function for identifying duplicates. And if not, why not?

2
Lovepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

If a poll worker can just run the same stack twice... No fucking way that's not being abused.

4
GodDamnedEngineer 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is just no reason that an election by computer cannot be the most transparent way of doing an election. All the code should be open source and the records should be recorded. Any of us should be able to confirm our vote at any time and all records should be freely available to the public. This is INSANITY.

3
2020REBOUND [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

exactly. blockchain. everyone can track the vote and the totals are seen realtime by everyone.

3
Killerko 3 points ago +3 / -0

these people need to go jail for very long time.. otherwise the same thing gonna happen again and again..

3
kung-flu-fighting 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lets say out of the 40 workers you get 2 bad actors that with some guise could get away with 500+ for Biden every hour for 20 hours, so thats 20K votes at one location. That is a lot of rigging! They really need to audit all of this. Securing elections should be top priority, but it's almost like they don't want to fix it.

3
2020REBOUND [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, or all of them are bad actors and they do it from 11PM to 4AM flipping the whole state of Michigan.

3
krepoisbest 3 points ago +3 / -0

Out of all results, I was most skeptical about the Michigan result.

3
WheresHuntwr 3 points ago +3 / -0

Guys, there's no credible evidence. Anderson Cooper and Neil Cavuto already said so. Cmon man!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
BarbaraStreisand 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is EXACTLY what happened in 2016 in Detroit. Jill Steins recount uncovered that in Democrat strongholds like Detroit they had run the ballots through the machines 6 times, inflating clintons vote count. As soon as this was uncovered, Jill Steins recount was immediately halted.

3
NeoSprtacus 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the only reason john james 'lost.'

But if they brought ballots in I wonder if they spent the time marking his name down too?

3
2020REBOUND [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah I guess they did that for Senator Peters(D).

In theory all they had to do was running 1 Peters Ballot through 100 000 times, basically.
Ppossibly they added physical ballots in the then needed amount later.

3
tbazin_baboons 3 points ago +3 / -0

The ballots that were brought there in the AM were dirty ballots that were then scanned into the machine multiple times. The machines had access to the voter database and to in-person ballots. The individual vote vote counters were not aware that this was happening. Dead people voted because the dirty ballots were matched with individuals in the voter database in districts that hadn't come out strong.

The machines were connected to the internet and had access to our voter database. That's how the election was stolen.

2
2020REBOUND [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You got it!

They calculated what they needed and then, at least in part , physically added the votes.

They also had to make sure not to reach beyond 100% turnout.

That`s why the dominion guys were there in place to make sure it all works out.

2
emeraldcity 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think they might have screwed up on this, if you look at individual precincts.

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. But how do you prove that. You can prove the deceased voters. The theory that there is more than one person with the same name and date of birth (apparently loads of them) can easily be confirmed by ringing them and asking them if they are dead or not. It also explains why so many people who have moved or are still registered with their maiden name, but there will be so many more that can only be found by them confirming they didn't vote, or didn't vote for that person. Deleted votes, if that is true, and sabotaged ballots will also be hard to identify.

But the machines are definitely NOT supposed to be connected to the internet at ground level. Any of them that were are suspect as they are not secure. Any machines with parts in them that allow remote access whatsoever are also suspect. This is just scandalous if this was happening.

3
salvecitizen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Melissa said every ballot in the batch of fifty was 'scanned' 'counted' 8-10 times. Interview then said 'so those ballots were duplicated'. Gotta get the details right.

Also: Were ballots actually physically run through machine multiple times? Or is each getting multi-counted from in one run-through? Her term 'scanned' might mean multiple physical runs through, or might mean only multiple image grabs.

2
2020REBOUND [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can watch the 15 minute version here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/C9xuUD0fjb2z/
Link to full version there too(1hour). I think she talks about real ballots moved through several times. She goes through the process on how the ballots are kept in stacks of 50 and how they`re handled.

3
Gold-Eyed-Cat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Try him. And if convicted, hang Nick Ikonomakis from the neck until dead.

3
Undying 3 points ago +3 / -0

This shit is going to sink so many people.

2
emeraldcity 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

TO DOMINION / PARAGON:

Why please is it possible to scan the same ballot 10 times? How hard is it to put in a detect duplicate function?

Why is it ever necessary to count votes for one candidate at a lower ratio than the other?

Under what valid circumstances do you need to "match" a signature by 40% or less?

Can you think of any problems that might occur with a "delete votes" feature or a "switch votes" feature?

Can you think of any problems that might occur with election officials being able to fill in blank ballots?

2
2020REBOUND [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their software can turn off or lower the threshold of what is possible to go undetected!

It's known they lowered the threshold for signatures in NV.

2
emeraldcity 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, saw it. It just makes no sense, other than to pass fake signatures. I really can't think of a valid reason for this "feature".

1
2020REBOUND [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The whole machine and software, and Ikonomakis patents are laid out this way too, are designed to be able to mess with the thresholds. All hidden by making it a feature for different legal requirements. But obviously just doublespeak. That's part of why it was blocked from use in other states.

So a Trump county, same state, can be run with the setting on how it's supposed to be. False signature ballots thrown out.
Then a Biden county can be run with lowest threshold, 0,00001% signatures thrown out.

2
InvincibleMAGA17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Guys I wanted to download this video but my software didn't work. Can someone send it to me please? I want to post and upload in other social media places esp the enemy camp!

2
CosmaOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Guys like him giving my country a bad rep. As if we hadn't enough cucks here.

2
ChilledCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

They did this in 2016. They rerun bsllots all the time

2
Eagle_Eyes_2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

9870666 Patent number of the voting machine/system/method by Nick Ikonomakis

1
bananafone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where's the hard evidence?

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Having watched the whole 16 minutes of my life I will never get back, I would not rely on her testimony alone.

1
2020REBOUND [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

She's not an effective speaker, shes an IT person, and the content is what counts which is damning in its core.

2
emeraldcity 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

There's an older video, much earlier and she is a bit muddled, struggling to answer some of the questions and explain things. I'll look for a link. But she is totally credible in this, and I absolutely believe she has seen things which must be questioned. But this one looks like she's been over- coached, or adding things in she's read. The earlier video is actually more powerful, and damning.

There is no doubt to me she was employed by Dominion in IT / helping with scanning, and the people she claims were there, were (all easily checked anyway). Why were they though? Why was Nick Ikonomakos in Michigan at all?! I believe her when she says he was, particularly from watching the earlier video.

She is telling the absolute truth in my opinion that if there was a jam when scanning a batch of, say, 50 ballots, it ended up with some ballots being scanned twice. The interviewer asks her if that means they are transferred to the tabulated results twice, and she doesn't know.

This question is just SO IMPORTANT. I have even read the Dominion manual (as you do) and I can't see anything saying dupllicates are identified. All videos I have seen say they are not identified. It is hard to stress how important this is. They can be duplicated by poll workers not only on purpose, but even just by accident. Can people just copy ballots and dump them in a drop box? Mind-blowing.

I think Sidney Powell is all over this one and so time will tell.

1
2020REBOUND [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

To me the most damning sequence is:

Her seeing the counter of ballots scanned at 500 at a machine.

(It's supposed to be at most 50 cause every batch is 50 ballots, then it restarts)

She tells the person scanning to stop. Needs to talk to her supervisor. She tells her supervisor, Co-owner of Dominion, Nick Ikonomakis, about the problem.

Ikonomakis tells her that she shouldn't worry about the votes and that they, Dominion, want no problems.

No Republican watcher present. So Ikonomakis didn`t suspect there was a technical problem. He knew that this was "normal" for the Detroit facility.

1
Nationalist2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

god damn these people need to be brought to justice. Fast trials. Death penalty.

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why not, just for fun, audit the place she is talking about.

1
findthewarmspot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Arrest him for treason. Let him prove to a court he didn’t commit voter fraud.

-2
cuckslasher -2 points ago +3 / -5

she seems full of shit

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
4
JeremiahKassin 4 points ago +5 / -1

Not if she testifies to it in court. Then it becomes testimony.

-15
wumao -15 points ago +7 / -22

And still, no one will be arrested.

14
LanaForge 14 points ago +18 / -4

No one will get arrested if we all have the same garbage disposition as you do, all your posts are demoralizing low energy BS, it could either be that:

A) you're a shill doing it on purpose or B) you're just a weak person that can't help but spread negativity everywhere

If you don't have anything worthy to share then just don't, go do something else.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
2
Forgedmale 2 points ago +2 / -0

To legally affect a citizen's arrest, you must have WITNESSED A FELONY CRIME. Misdemeanor doesn't count. Being told about it doesn't count. You must have witnessed the felony crime.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +4 / -7 (edited)