I believe u/Geeee 's interpretation is correct. The former is a type of "eyewitness" testimony that can be and is used in court. Ex: The USPS whistleblower who testified to overhearing his direct supervisors discussing the backdating of PA ballots. He can (and possibly did) sign an affidavit to that effect and federal inspectors came and braced him so that Adam Schiff could tweet out that the postal worker ""recanted"".
The latter from u/Geeee 's example is rumor and innuendo and has no legal basis. IANAL, of course.
Hearsay evidence, in a legal forum, is testimony from a witness under oath who is reciting an out-of-court statement, content of which is being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
Wikipedia
It is not hearsay, ffs. That's not what hearsay is.
You can say you said "X". I can say I heard you said "X". What is hearsay is "John told me jrgreen73 said X"
Literally is what hearsay is.
"coming from the mouth of another person, it's hearsay."
Literally.
hear·say
/ˈhirˌsā/
noun
information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.
Eric Ciaramella has entered the chat
I believe u/Geeee 's interpretation is correct. The former is a type of "eyewitness" testimony that can be and is used in court. Ex: The USPS whistleblower who testified to overhearing his direct supervisors discussing the backdating of PA ballots. He can (and possibly did) sign an affidavit to that effect and federal inspectors came and braced him so that Adam Schiff could tweet out that the postal worker ""recanted"".
The latter from u/Geeee 's example is rumor and innuendo and has no legal basis. IANAL, of course.
Correct - in the last example, you need jrgreen or "John" to testify.
Literally that's not what he wrote.
Literally.
Hearsay evidence, in a legal forum, is testimony from a witness under oath who is reciting an out-of-court statement, content of which is being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Wikipedia