12
DR SHIVA might be WRONG (youtu.be) πŸ›‘ STOP THE STEAL πŸ›‘
posted ago by BobbyLee ago by BobbyLee +12 / -0
Comments (19)
sorted by:
3
AmishMachinist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Godspeed pede. I said this earlier and got ratioed. As far as I can understand him, this guy has good points and raises legitimate questions.

1
BobbyLee [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes we need to look at and address the deboonks to avoid confirmation bias and echo chambers

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
Skippy737 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hes got 4 degrees from MIt If he speaks, id tend to believe him and call him an expert

3
MAGA1775 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doesn't matter. Rudy and Sidney said they have concrete proof that Dominion and Smartmatic were altering and shifting votes.

1
BobbyLee [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct, this is independent from the other stuff and changes nothing

3
BobbyLee [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting analysis but does not disprove fraud.

2
OrangeLivesMatterCA 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’s just trying to cash in, and when it all goes to court people this twat will see how fucking wrong they were.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Kongol626 2 points ago +2 / -0

He needs to hurry up and debunk this guy or else support will disappear for Dr Shiva. I also hope the president isn't using Dr Shiva when they said they have statistical analysis of fraud. Matt brings up a lot of good points and I really want him to reply to Matt asap.

1
BobbyLee [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed, Dr Shiva needs to address the good points. DEBOONK!

2
Kongol626 2 points ago +2 / -0

He just did in a new video. Destroys all of them in 2 points. Weighted races and duh it's a line graph. Lol

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
VilanceD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Im going to verify Kent county myself and see if I can debunk the debunk.

2
VilanceD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also this guy ignores the fact that other counties show a healthy spread. I have analyzed over 4 counties now using a similar technique and its very clear when there are discrepancies. Hint, 2 were natural looking and 2 were a bent trend-line around 20%.

2
VilanceD 2 points ago +2 / -0

His analysis is BS! He is getting his analysis backwards. See here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRAdlitvD35vwwmH_jq1Oq2yP_XLip-AosdAtGSmcXkfjoGr28lv05rHT-drw3J0ZY9_OPSHOpR6tao/pubhtml The reason he is getting both graphs looking the same is because he is not using the same x axis. The X axis is the % that is Democratic 100 on the left, no pun intended, and Republican on the right, ugh so pun intended. So the far left is absolute 100% Dem voting, and Far right is absolute 100% Rep. If you use make a chart of the same data then use an X axis of Dem 0 to 100 it will look like the same chart, which means this guy is not doing good analysis.

2
thudlike 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shiva had political ambitions in Massachusetts, trying to become the Republican candidate to run against Elizabeth Warren/Pocahontas. Radio talk show host Howie Carr outed Shiva as a fraud, and they had an on-air dust up. I've never trusted Shiva (the "inventor" of email? right) Honestly, I haven't followed his recent claims, but I would be very skeptical about anything this man says.

Shiva on Howie Carr Show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySAKR1CRFPA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5ton56RaCY

1
VilanceD 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just ran the numbers on my analysis (this is my work fyi, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/caught-part-3-impossible-ballot-ratio-found-milwaukee-results-change-wisconsin-election-30000-votes-switched-president-trump-biden/#post-comments) and when i added in the "Biden" it actually reinforces my analysis.