There's so much I could write getting into this topic, but this modern trend of hyperurbanizstion and the death of the primary and secondary sectors of the economy is NOT a natural state of affairs, it's hegemonic warfare being waged by the Democrats. Our cities are bigger than ever yet they din't produce anything of direct value. The Democrats now use fluffed up urban numbers to steal elections and further this trend and thus their hegemony and power, to the detriment of normal Americans
The short answer is yes, it would be. Fewer people (if we're talking hypotheticals then the Democrats in this scenario would not have flooded the countrynwith immigrants) spread out more in smaller cities with way more primary and secondary sector jobs, like it used to be way back when. Until the postwar uniparty system, America was defined by its small cities. Logically, in an actual free market, it makes sense that small cities would dominate rather than hyper-metroplexes. All the advantages of services and population, without enormous capital needs for infrastructure, and more direct political control (which is a factor people take into account when choosing where to live)
There's so much I could write getting into this topic, but this modern trend of hyperurbanizstion and the death of the primary and secondary sectors of the economy is NOT a natural state of affairs, it's hegemonic warfare being waged by the Democrats. Our cities are bigger than ever yet they din't produce anything of direct value. The Democrats now use fluffed up urban numbers to steal elections and further this trend and thus their hegemony and power, to the detriment of normal Americans
The short answer is yes, it would be. Fewer people (if we're talking hypotheticals then the Democrats in this scenario would not have flooded the countrynwith immigrants) spread out more in smaller cities with way more primary and secondary sector jobs, like it used to be way back when. Until the postwar uniparty system, America was defined by its small cities. Logically, in an actual free market, it makes sense that small cities would dominate rather than hyper-metroplexes. All the advantages of services and population, without enormous capital needs for infrastructure, and more direct political control (which is a factor people take into account when choosing where to live)