Because they expected us to just roll over and take the loss. We're not. We're still high energy and they can't understand why. "Get over it" "you lost" etc etc. Yet when we flip the results it will wipe their smug look right off their face and they will be devastated. These people believe the media calls the election. That should tell you everything you need to know.
He’s saying he’s seen insider evidence of voter fraud that will be coming out within the next few days. Basically guaranteeing this thing is about to flip 100% to Trump because it’s so massive and irrefutable.
Unless the lawyers and administration feel he's an important voice to help "hold the line", and understand he's competent enough to release a slow drip and not spill the beans
It would be entirely speculative but he has previously met with the president and discussed their thoughts on the political landscape. I don't know if he's signed any NDAs but he has insisted he has one degree of separation from Rudy Giuliani.
His own podcast. He’s met the president at least twice (we know of) and he mentioned he signed an NDA of some sort. It was at a time when POTUS met with other pro-Trump ‘influencers’
It’s unclear if he’s met him recently, or in regards to this issue in particular though, (and he wouldn’t tell us if he did) So we’ll have to wait and see
I follow Scott and here is the premise I think is most likely. After the election Scott has made several references to the fact that the left has irritated some of the most brilliant autistic people in the world and they have dug into the data and have found something big. I believe that his opinion has weight because Scott Adams has personal relationships with Naval Ravikant and Dr. Shiva. Scott definitely has an opportunity to get a heads up as to what is being looked at.
Assuming he's telling the truth, he should dump a bunch of money in the betting markets. I don't have enough history with Scott Adams to know whether he's guilty of "it's happening" type behavior or not, but I have noticed people on the Trump legal team seem extremely confident.
You don't actually need a Twitter account to read it. I closed mine a year ago.
It's mostly Scott taunting the other guy about knowing something we don't and driving him crazy, while the other guy flings a bunch of ad-homs at Scott.
I followed Scott Adams when I had a Twitter account. He was actually the person who convinced me that Trump was a viable presidential candidate and got me looking for more information. He also accurately called every single major political event of 2017 at least a month in advance. If he syas he has something, he probably does.
I recall his self-stated goal is to become "the most credible person in the country". A bad prediction would go a long ways towards undermining that goal.
This is exactly why I believe Sidney Powell and Lin Wood. Their entire legacies are based on the perception they are fighting for Americans, taking truth to power.
They would not throw that all away to sell a book or gain twitter followers.
I remember him being very angry at the first debate when Trump didn't finish the "fine people" hoax once and for all, even though he had the opportunity.
Are we overturning this entire thing? Because while I'm 100% putting energy toward the Presidential reelection, I absolutely would not complain about a Republican supermajority in both houses.
In the 2016 election he correctly predicted Trump had an excellent shot at winning. He eventually went on to meet Trump and has since developed ties within the Trump circle
Scott Adams is a lot smarter than a lot of people seem to think. He wrote several blog posts back in 2016 explaining why he thought Donald Trump would win, and proceeded to accurately predict every major political event of 2017 more than a month in advance.
He has been wrong, but not often. His track record is insane. If Scott says he's got something, I'm inclined to believe him.
Yes, definitely read the entire thread as THEIR projection has reached Total Hysteria levels!!! Example up top from this baby (quote): Scott - for the 100th time- present all the evidence you promised of election quackery and fraud and I’m all ears. If you’re full of it, kindly stop the nonsense. Thanks.
But hey folks - it's perfectly FINE that we're to accept WITHOUT QUESTION all of their FAKE investigations, Juicy Smollester, Russian hookers in hotel rooms, Hillary 'accidentally' deleted 30K emails, Mueller's ENTIRE team accidentally erased ALL of their government cell phones, etc, etc. FUCK YOU!!!
I don't think you will see anything the legal team will lay out, all you see on twitter is a warning to instill fear in those that are responsible and so they may come forth. The reason the legal team won't lay out any irrefutably hard evidence is because they don't want to let the MSM create a narrative around it. Because that is how they work, they know they lose on facts they lose on logic so they fight with narratives, and rally emotions of the zombified liberals.
I am making the guess, that DNC coordinated some parts of the process.
Specifically, if one part produces fake numbers, those numbers need to be supported by actual paper ballots.
Who knows about the evidence.... Potential scenarios:
perhaps they marked the ballot paper in a way that makes it easy to identify which ballots have been printed outside of the system. Since they destroyed some Trump ballots they needed to replace them with Biden ballots, and they needed to print them somewhere.
Perhaps they had a communication that has been intercepted (zoom call, email) where they discussed the specifics.
Perhaps Trump officials did look back into some of the historic elections from 2016 and 2018 and had some time to do reconnaissance and prepare a trap.
I only assume that intelligence agencies have been used, FISA warrants have been used, as Trump team is not very vocal about the evidence that they have.
It a small price, the attorney stated today, allot of people are going to prison. She does not say anything she can not prove or already have the goods
Considering Scott Adams is predicting that all the fraud will come to nothing and Biden will take office anyway, I don't exactly want his predictions to come true.
Whatever he has, or claims to know, even he says in one of his tweets he doesn’t think it’ll “change the outcome” (of the election)...whatever that means?...I dunno. That thread actually seems a bit disappointing. We’ll see I guess.
Not saying I trust Scott necessarily either, but a) he's not just a comic strip author. He's become one of the more influential conservative voices over the past few years, and his books are best sellers. And b) no reason to think if he was shown evidence that he was the only one. There could be any number of people privy to information that has not yet been made public.
Scott likes to troll the crazies who fill his feed during his broadcasts. I wouldn't read too much into it, he doesn't have super secret insider info that nobody else has. If you think he does, why?
Why is Scott Adams Gladlighting* us? He has no reason not to share something he has seen, wither directly if possible or indirectly. He's not involved, he's not an official, and there are no legal restriction on him sharing something that he has seen. Maybe he's addicted to clicks or he's seeing better ad revenue etc. I don;t know. But I know one thing:
At the risk of being called a doomer, I am tending to agree with this sentiment. It just seems so far that a lot of people are saying "just you wait, we are gonna blow this thing up", which quite frankly, we have been hearing for the last four years now, so it's nothing new.
However...
From what we have seen, the steal was clear, statistical evidence alone proves it, plus we all know that they were willing to do whatever was necessary to get this "win" and have been planning it for years, also, the way the media covered election night was almost rehearsed, and unlike any election coverage I have ever seen, you could see them spinning it right before your eyes.
So having said that, I am optimistic there will at least be a strong attempt at exposing them, and overturning this steal in the courts, and perhaps even taking it farther than just giving the win to Trump.
I just really can't stand all this tick tocking and wow wait until next week bullshit, I understand they want to keep people engaged, but its just turning me off.
I mean, the Hunter laptop alone should have destroyed this entire thing, he was caught stone cold doing the very things they accuse Trump of doing, and throw in the pedophilia and drug use and debauchery just for good measure, and not one damn thing has been done to anyone involved. If you can't get an investigation into something like that, election fraud is a misdemeanor in comparison.
Anyway, just rambling here, I am just sick to death with all this, so I am hoping they just get on with it either way..
Very credible. He likes Trump but also hasn’t been shy about criticizing him. Isn’t a partisan hack either. Fair and balanced. I haven’t ever seen him claim anything he wasn’t able to backup so this is very encouraging.
Trump likes Scott and he has been to the White House although he doesn’t seem to be on Trump’s inner circle. Scott always comes up with predictions an theories. Many, but not all, come true. This is not a prediction. It seems like a claim. He doesn’t do that often and he is certainly not the LARPing type. Therefore I find this very interesting.
Agree with you. He did claim briefly in 2016 that Trump would lose. That was in early October when the tapes came out. So he too fell for the media's propaganda even if it was only for a brief period.
Scott Adams is a con artist. He wishes he was as smart as Trump and so he rides Trump's coat tails and tell us he can explain Trump's "persuasive" abilities.
Scott sells books, and sold a book about Trump tactics. So he finds the audience and sucks up to them.
He admits he said he was voting for Hillary because he was afraid of righteous Democrats. Lame.
He can be interesting, but this has gotten weird. He doesn't have an inside scoop. He's playing you. He's not even doing a convincing job.
Hell this post is probably an alt account of his. I think he would be smart enough to cover it well.
I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that Scott Adams accurately predicted every single major political event of 2017 at least a month in advance.
I don't think Scott even has all the knowledge. Whatever he knows, is the Trump team going to put their whole operation in jeopardy leaking to a bald far-leftist?
yeah, weak post.
Because they expected us to just roll over and take the loss. We're not. We're still high energy and they can't understand why. "Get over it" "you lost" etc etc. Yet when we flip the results it will wipe their smug look right off their face and they will be devastated. These people believe the media calls the election. That should tell you everything you need to know.
It's going to be way past devastated. They are literally going to lose their minds.
Burning cities mad!
Oh no, that sucks! Please don’t hurt yourselves Biden bros!
This is a better link I think:
https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1328042367127932933
CULT OF TRUMP
I dont mind being part of that cult, they can call us whateve they want, their words hold no power over me!
A riddle for you: The worse things they call me the harder I get, what am I?
Yeah, I think all I saw is adams replied to one comment and basically said it's a secret.
Explain the comments im not on Twitter and refuse to sign up
He’s saying he’s seen insider evidence of voter fraud that will be coming out within the next few days. Basically guaranteeing this thing is about to flip 100% to Trump because it’s so massive and irrefutable.
Why would Scott see this?
Unless the lawyers and administration feel he's an important voice to help "hold the line", and understand he's competent enough to release a slow drip and not spill the beans
He’s met with POTUS. Probably has signed a NDA
A good business man knows who to tap to help build the business, whether it's engineering, contracts and legal, or public opinion.
Trump knows who to talk to get his message delivered to the people
Is this true?
It would be entirely speculative but he has previously met with the president and discussed their thoughts on the political landscape. I don't know if he's signed any NDAs but he has insisted he has one degree of separation from Rudy Giuliani.
I had 1 degree of separation from 0bama. It doesn't mean a whole lot to know someone who knows someone.
It would lend support if you claimed to have seen evidence from an insider.
Yes. Whether it pertain to this issue in particular IDK
Source?
His own podcast. He’s met the president at least twice (we know of) and he mentioned he signed an NDA of some sort. It was at a time when POTUS met with other pro-Trump ‘influencers’
It’s unclear if he’s met him recently, or in regards to this issue in particular though, (and he wouldn’t tell us if he did) So we’ll have to wait and see
Because he is on TheDonald.Win hitting refresh every 45 seconds and that is where all the theories are originating.
🚨🚨 ¯_(ツ)_/¯🚨🚨
Edit: Why does my shrug always drop an arm?
I follow Scott and here is the premise I think is most likely. After the election Scott has made several references to the fact that the left has irritated some of the most brilliant autistic people in the world and they have dug into the data and have found something big. I believe that his opinion has weight because Scott Adams has personal relationships with Naval Ravikant and Dr. Shiva. Scott definitely has an opportunity to get a heads up as to what is being looked at.
He probably lurks here. I doubt he has special access to any non-public information.
He has friends in the administration
Maybe that would include Chris Miller and/or Kash Patel?
Thank you
Thanks from me too! I'm not on twatter either
I hope and pray you're right.
Assuming he's telling the truth, he should dump a bunch of money in the betting markets. I don't have enough history with Scott Adams to know whether he's guilty of "it's happening" type behavior or not, but I have noticed people on the Trump legal team seem extremely confident.
you just click the link and a browser tab opens, you don't need to have app or sign up.
You don't actually need a Twitter account to read it. I closed mine a year ago.
It's mostly Scott taunting the other guy about knowing something we don't and driving him crazy, while the other guy flings a bunch of ad-homs at Scott.
I followed Scott Adams when I had a Twitter account. He was actually the person who convinced me that Trump was a viable presidential candidate and got me looking for more information. He also accurately called every single major political event of 2017 at least a month in advance. If he syas he has something, he probably does.
Isn't he the dilburt guy? Why would he see any evidence?
Scott Adams doesn’t seem like the type of guy to hype sh** up for no reason either.
I recall his self-stated goal is to become "the most credible person in the country". A bad prediction would go a long ways towards undermining that goal.
This is exactly why I believe Sidney Powell and Lin Wood. Their entire legacies are based on the perception they are fighting for Americans, taking truth to power.
They would not throw that all away to sell a book or gain twitter followers.
Scott Adams is a tech guy based in reality.
He faked it about a month ago just to say 'the left are assholes to me anyway, guess I'm voting Trump again'
Pretty funny. He's a manipulator/persuader. Read between the lines with him.
I got downvoted to the stone age a few days ago for pointing this out.
No. He's pragmatic and objective. He's pro-truth and supports the lawsuits.
I remember him being very angry at the first debate when Trump didn't finish the "fine people" hoax once and for all, even though he had the opportunity.
He has hedged his bet however. He did say it was huge but it still might not be enough to turn the tide.
Are we overturning this entire thing? Because while I'm 100% putting energy toward the Presidential reelection, I absolutely would not complain about a Republican supermajority in both houses.
Thanks for the explanation
In the 2016 election he correctly predicted Trump had an excellent shot at winning. He eventually went on to meet Trump and has since developed ties within the Trump circle
Scott Adams is a lot smarter than a lot of people seem to think. He wrote several blog posts back in 2016 explaining why he thought Donald Trump would win, and proceeded to accurately predict every major political event of 2017 more than a month in advance.
He has been wrong, but not often. His track record is insane. If Scott says he's got something, I'm inclined to believe him.
He's reinventing himself as a political pundit. Comics aren't as lucrative anymore. You might want to listen to his daily podcasts.
Like an especially bored cat playing with a mouse.
Right after Hillary gets arrested...
Yes, definitely read the entire thread as THEIR projection has reached Total Hysteria levels!!! Example up top from this baby (quote): Scott - for the 100th time- present all the evidence you promised of election quackery and fraud and I’m all ears. If you’re full of it, kindly stop the nonsense. Thanks.
But hey folks - it's perfectly FINE that we're to accept WITHOUT QUESTION all of their FAKE investigations, Juicy Smollester, Russian hookers in hotel rooms, Hillary 'accidentally' deleted 30K emails, Mueller's ENTIRE team accidentally erased ALL of their government cell phones, etc, etc. FUCK YOU!!!
Evidence is one thing. The ability of judges to ignore evidence is another.
I don't think you will see anything the legal team will lay out, all you see on twitter is a warning to instill fear in those that are responsible and so they may come forth. The reason the legal team won't lay out any irrefutably hard evidence is because they don't want to let the MSM create a narrative around it. Because that is how they work, they know they lose on facts they lose on logic so they fight with narratives, and rally emotions of the zombified liberals.
I am making the guess, that DNC coordinated some parts of the process.
Specifically, if one part produces fake numbers, those numbers need to be supported by actual paper ballots.
Who knows about the evidence.... Potential scenarios:
perhaps they marked the ballot paper in a way that makes it easy to identify which ballots have been printed outside of the system. Since they destroyed some Trump ballots they needed to replace them with Biden ballots, and they needed to print them somewhere.
Perhaps they had a communication that has been intercepted (zoom call, email) where they discussed the specifics.
Perhaps Trump officials did look back into some of the historic elections from 2016 and 2018 and had some time to do reconnaissance and prepare a trap.
I only assume that intelligence agencies have been used, FISA warrants have been used, as Trump team is not very vocal about the evidence that they have.
All I'm seeing is a string of Tweets my omega males who literally get all their information about the world from mainstream media.
Omegaman X.
What a fucking waste of time. How did this get 750 upvotes?
It a small price, the attorney stated today, allot of people are going to prison. She does not say anything she can not prove or already have the goods
stop posting the tick tock bull shit, please.
Considering Scott Adams is predicting that all the fraud will come to nothing and Biden will take office anyway, I don't exactly want his predictions to come true.
I can't see tweets because I don't have twitter anymore.
I don't either but I have no problem. When it says this tweet is not available to you, refresh 2-3x. It usually shows for me. Twatter is full of shit.
Whatever he has, or claims to know, even he says in one of his tweets he doesn’t think it’ll “change the outcome” (of the election)...whatever that means?...I dunno. That thread actually seems a bit disappointing. We’ll see I guess.
Forget Cialis older frens, a two week freedom boner would cure any ED.
Not saying I trust Scott necessarily either, but a) he's not just a comic strip author. He's become one of the more influential conservative voices over the past few years, and his books are best sellers. And b) no reason to think if he was shown evidence that he was the only one. There could be any number of people privy to information that has not yet been made public.
That said, he could also be lying. Who knows.
Why would he have access to anything?
how or why would he have seen it already?
So now we have SA larping. Cool.
Scott likes to troll the crazies who fill his feed during his broadcasts. I wouldn't read too much into it, he doesn't have super secret insider info that nobody else has. If you think he does, why?
Why is Scott Adams Gladlighting* us? He has no reason not to share something he has seen, wither directly if possible or indirectly. He's not involved, he's not an official, and there are no legal restriction on him sharing something that he has seen. Maybe he's addicted to clicks or he's seeing better ad revenue etc. I don;t know. But I know one thing:
This is bullshit.
At the risk of being called a doomer, I am tending to agree with this sentiment. It just seems so far that a lot of people are saying "just you wait, we are gonna blow this thing up", which quite frankly, we have been hearing for the last four years now, so it's nothing new.
However...
From what we have seen, the steal was clear, statistical evidence alone proves it, plus we all know that they were willing to do whatever was necessary to get this "win" and have been planning it for years, also, the way the media covered election night was almost rehearsed, and unlike any election coverage I have ever seen, you could see them spinning it right before your eyes.
So having said that, I am optimistic there will at least be a strong attempt at exposing them, and overturning this steal in the courts, and perhaps even taking it farther than just giving the win to Trump.
I just really can't stand all this tick tocking and wow wait until next week bullshit, I understand they want to keep people engaged, but its just turning me off.
I mean, the Hunter laptop alone should have destroyed this entire thing, he was caught stone cold doing the very things they accuse Trump of doing, and throw in the pedophilia and drug use and debauchery just for good measure, and not one damn thing has been done to anyone involved. If you can't get an investigation into something like that, election fraud is a misdemeanor in comparison.
Anyway, just rambling here, I am just sick to death with all this, so I am hoping they just get on with it either way..
Very credible. He likes Trump but also hasn’t been shy about criticizing him. Isn’t a partisan hack either. Fair and balanced. I haven’t ever seen him claim anything he wasn’t able to backup so this is very encouraging.
Trump likes Scott and he has been to the White House although he doesn’t seem to be on Trump’s inner circle. Scott always comes up with predictions an theories. Many, but not all, come true. This is not a prediction. It seems like a claim. He doesn’t do that often and he is certainly not the LARPing type. Therefore I find this very interesting.
Agree with you. He did claim briefly in 2016 that Trump would lose. That was in early October when the tapes came out. So he too fell for the media's propaganda even if it was only for a brief period.
One of the few I subscribe and listen to daily since 2016. Scott Adams and Poso round out my feed and never disappoint.
Scott Adams is a con artist. He wishes he was as smart as Trump and so he rides Trump's coat tails and tell us he can explain Trump's "persuasive" abilities.
Scott sells books, and sold a book about Trump tactics. So he finds the audience and sucks up to them.
He admits he said he was voting for Hillary because he was afraid of righteous Democrats. Lame.
He can be interesting, but this has gotten weird. He doesn't have an inside scoop. He's playing you. He's not even doing a convincing job.
Hell this post is probably an alt account of his. I think he would be smart enough to cover it well.
I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that Scott Adams accurately predicted every single major political event of 2017 at least a month in advance.
I don't think Scott even has all the knowledge. Whatever he knows, is the Trump team going to put their whole operation in jeopardy leaking to a bald far-leftist?
Leftist?
He describes himself as "left of Bernie".
When?
Here for example: https://twitter.com/scottadamssays/status/1301132050091503618
Culturally left then? That'd be unfortunate.
Don't worry. He's one of the good guys.
Yesterday or the day before on his youtube channel.
I wonder why. Dilbert seems so based.