250
Comments (33)
sorted by:
24
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 24 points ago +24 / -0

Confused. Isn't she one of the good guys?

4
pepperconchobhar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes. She is. She backed Trump heavily in '16.

23
BrotherAshanti22 23 points ago +23 / -0

Mercer is with us. What's the problem?

23
Mrsattorney 23 points ago +23 / -0

Isn't Dan Bongino a part owner of Parler?

18
deleted 18 points ago +23 / -5
10
deleted 10 points ago +12 / -2
6
OwnaLib87 6 points ago +9 / -3

You realize you’re posting on a social media site right?

5
thebest2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

No

4
SuperDuperHypersonic 4 points ago +4 / -0

According to the left, TD.win is antisocial media.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
OwnaLib87 1 point ago +1 / -0

YOU DOOO SIMPRE JACK

4
swimminginthoughts 4 points ago +4 / -0

What are you going to do, actually talk to people you really know in real life?

5
South_Florida_Guy 5 points ago +6 / -1

This is the way. Never had it, never will. Only was on reddit for TD and now here. That's the extent of any "social media" I've ever had.

3
IncredibleMrE1 [S] 3 points ago +6 / -3

Never had Parler, never will.

17
Ask_If_Im_A_Cactus 17 points ago +17 / -0

Cambridge Analytical helped us

Why do you think MSM helped to destroy them?

This makes me feel better about Parler if anything

In the world of billionaires, the Mercers are like the Trumps: our guys

16
Tseliteiv 16 points ago +23 / -7

I don't get this war on Parler...

Yes, they require phone numbers. As far as I know Twitter did for a long time then switched to allowing emails.

In any case. Google/Apple/MS/FB have everyone's data already so what difference does it make if Parler has that data?

Tech companies already know who you are and you likely aren't effective in preventing them from knowing who you are.

I've already seen theories that Parler is a MOSSAD run company that is meant to act as controlled opposition where both conservatives and liberals fight among themselves on different platform without anyone mentioning the fact that Jews are controlling things...

I mean, why did we get here with Parler? They just want to be twitter but not. Would dropping the phone number thing be enough to fix it in everyone's mind?

12
CandyBarr 12 points ago +14 / -2

Jack Dorsey is posting this with his alt account

He's butt hurt they changed the original flavor solyent so he's over here talking shit about Parler

This is that you do if you have SDE

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
13
DicksOutForHarambe 13 points ago +13 / -0

Isn't Cambridge conservative?

10
Commodore64 10 points ago +10 / -0

What's this commie propaganda? All that matter to me is it's freedom compared to twitter.

2
pepperconchobhar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right now, we're witnessing social media wars. The smaller sites are scrambling to pick up conservatives fleeing Fox, Twitter, and FB. Part of that is disinformation.

Over the last week I've heard:

  • MeWe is NOT owned by China

  • Parler is NOT owned by George Soros

  • Newsmax is NOT 'in bed' with Clinton and Soros

  • And Mewe did NOT donate $1.2 million to Biden

Rebekah Mercer IS backing Parler... and she's a WHITE hat.

I don't know who's manufacturing these claims, but it could just be fans. Or it could be bad guys who want to prevent us from organizing. I've seen these rumors cause serious disruption with new conservative groups.

For now, ignore it all.

2
its_maam 2 points ago +2 / -0

So?

2
Shaffro 2 points ago +3 / -1

You can't trust anyone. Just as well, I never could access that site. No loss.

2
six5_SMK 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a home, it's called thedonald.win

2
JustTheNews 2 points ago +3 / -1

I never had one...the day they banned .win from posts (even though it has since been corrected) that was the red flag for me....GAB is still around, but kinda failed to launch

3
Ih8leftists 3 points ago +4 / -1

It was fixed the same day. Enjoy gab that has like 10 people

3
JustTheNews 3 points ago +4 / -1

i dont use gab...i use .win like a real man

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
5
DJ_NeckFace 5 points ago +6 / -1

lol its not that hard to get someone's phone #. In fact they used to have a BIG yellow or white book with a shit ton of Phone numbers and names in them.

3
the_shootist 3 points ago +4 / -1

The problem is they text sms verification codes to that number. So if you don't have access to it you are SOL.

Source:. Signed up using a TextNow number. Worked for a bit, but when I changed numbers through the app I could no longer get in. Also won't allow Google voice numbers

1
labajada 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Millions of people look at this book everyday!"

-1
IncredibleMrE1 [S] -1 points ago +3 / -4

The phone # requirement never passed the sniff test for me. Glad I never signed up!

Spez: Here's the background for why I don't trust the Mercers, courtesy of Sundance. https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1328078375521562624

9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2