He has experience explaining this very thing in court and won.
Not only did he present evidence of what took place using the dominion system, he exposed the arrogance of the left who work in the tech world. They obviously believe that conservatives don't understand, or know tech.
They programmed an algorithm to make one specific change based upon population, and kept that change as a certain percentage that created a linear result. What they should have done is programmed it to appear random like an actual election would show. Instead, they programmed it to activate when Trump would reach a 20 to 40 percent threshold and kept that pattern which is a statistical impossibility.
They also underestimated the support Trump had and didn't even bother with using the algorithm in what they considered democrat strongholds like Detroit where Trump also outperformed Biden.
This analysis tells me that not only did Trump win the popular vote and every state that randomly changed, over 5 million votes were stolen from him as well.
What makes this worse is this doesn't even account for the fraud taking place with physical ballots that were trashed or fraudulently created.
Mr President, if you haven't already, hire Dr Shiva.
Unfortunately Dr Shiva’s math is really flawed. If you do his same analysis for Joe Biden’s votes you see the same thing where he “underperforms” in the most democratic districts. I know Dr Shiva is a smart guy, and I’m sure people have shown him his error. So I hope he comes back with some new data analysis and redeems himself, but until then, we shouldn’t rely on his original video. Here’s a source that breaks down the issue with his math: https://youtu.be/aokNwKx7gM8
Thanks for the link, However, let me preface this next part by mentioning I am not a mathematician, nor do I play one on tv or the internet. With that being said...
The main point to Dr Shiva's analysis was that the data shows manipulation because if the data was accurate, and not manipulated by an algorithm, it would have been straight across with little deviation and not sloped. I understand the point that Matt was trying to make in his video, but it doesn't really apply to the point that Shiva was trying to convey. Both are obviously going to be sloped because of the way the algorithm was written.
To go further - If you look on this very site you'll see information on votes being switched or erased. It doesn't say it was just for Trump. The way the algorithm was written is a give some take some, or in this case; give some, take more. This post here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/
Now, as I said, I'm not a mathematician, but I feel like my analysis of this will lead to the, "but you cannot subtract" scenario which I read several times on both videos. The issue that is coming into play which was apparently ignored in the analysis from Matt is that since the introduction of these machines tallying the votes, there has always been votes that were not tallied in a 1:1 ratio but more in a 1.64 ratio. That is how the downward slope is coming into play and not because of subtraction of percentages.
Now, what I am is a visual/spatial learner, and when the analysis of Biden was plugged into the plot, it was slight, but there was still a difference in orientation. Whether that has anything to do with the final result or how it applies to a specific amount of votes, I cannot make a determination on that.
What we seen in the video from Dr Shiva was a simplified explanation of the data. I'd be willing to bet if he went into full detail of how he came to the conclusion that he did, it would make more sense to statisticians. But as it stands, he was simply trying to show that the data was being manipulated by an algorithm.
I could be wrong on how I'm viewing this, and if I am, I welcome the clarification.
I definitely think you could be on to something about the difference of the Trump and Biden slopes! Worth looking into further. As it stand though just saying that there’s a slope does not prove manipulation, that’s why I hope dr Shiva publishes a follow up or reply
I honestly don't believe he will make another video with a follow up. The reason I say this is because If there wasn't manipulation the data would appear as it does at this part of the video here: https://youtu.be/Ztu5Y5obWPk?t=2711
There will always be some sort of slope when it comes to this type of statistical analysis, but it will never be as drastic as the slope being used in the earlier example. Even if it was as drastic with such a steep slope it most definitely wouldn't be linear along that path as there is always going to be some level of deviation.
Another example that I can provide to help further clarify this is this article written by the gateway pundit. Be prepared though, they don't explain it nearly as well as Dr Shiva: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/caught-part-2-email-inventor-dr-shiva-finds-impossible-ballot-ratio-feature-michigan-results-caught/
Hey, so I was wrong, Dr Shiva did do a follow up and explains it a lot better, which, not to toot my own horn, I was correct ☺️ it's here: https://youtube.com/watch?feature=emb_title&time_continue=405&v=umNbSvqozwQ