37
posted ago by Winged_Splinter ago by Winged_Splinter +38 / -1

He has experience explaining this very thing in court and won.

Not only did he present evidence of what took place using the dominion system, he exposed the arrogance of the left who work in the tech world. They obviously believe that conservatives don't understand, or know tech.

They programmed an algorithm to make one specific change based upon population, and kept that change as a certain percentage that created a linear result. What they should have done is programmed it to appear random like an actual election would show. Instead, they programmed it to activate when Trump would reach a 20 to 40 percent threshold and kept that pattern which is a statistical impossibility.

They also underestimated the support Trump had and didn't even bother with using the algorithm in what they considered democrat strongholds like Detroit where Trump also outperformed Biden.

This analysis tells me that not only did Trump win the popular vote and every state that randomly changed, over 5 million votes were stolen from him as well.

What makes this worse is this doesn't even account for the fraud taking place with physical ballots that were trashed or fraudulently created.

Mr President, if you haven't already, hire Dr Shiva.

Comments (5)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Polar_bearwrestler 2 points ago +2 / -0

I definitely think you could be on to something about the difference of the Trump and Biden slopes! Worth looking into further. As it stand though just saying that there’s a slope does not prove manipulation, that’s why I hope dr Shiva publishes a follow up or reply

1
Winged_Splinter [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I honestly don't believe he will make another video with a follow up. The reason I say this is because If there wasn't manipulation the data would appear as it does at this part of the video here: https://youtu.be/Ztu5Y5obWPk?t=2711

There will always be some sort of slope when it comes to this type of statistical analysis, but it will never be as drastic as the slope being used in the earlier example. Even if it was as drastic with such a steep slope it most definitely wouldn't be linear along that path as there is always going to be some level of deviation.

Another example that I can provide to help further clarify this is this article written by the gateway pundit. Be prepared though, they don't explain it nearly as well as Dr Shiva: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/caught-part-2-email-inventor-dr-shiva-finds-impossible-ballot-ratio-feature-michigan-results-caught/

1
Winged_Splinter [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Hey, so I was wrong, Dr Shiva did do a follow up and explains it a lot better, which, not to toot my own horn, I was correct ☺️ it's here: https://youtube.com/watch?feature=emb_title&time_continue=405&v=umNbSvqozwQ