334
Comments (20)
sorted by:
26
thxpk 26 points ago +26 / -0

Don't count on the electors doing this, they are RINOs.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
19
furfull 19 points ago +19 / -0

That would be Trump taking this into triple overtime. Hoping it doesn't have to get that far.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
2
Wu_Flu_Ca_Choo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I vote for this

11
VinceVonVroom 11 points ago +11 / -0

Except, at the end, we have now picked up an additional 3 state legislatures.

4
Meme_war_ii_vet 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not effective until Jan?

3
VinceVonVroom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not quite sure.

7
Sum_devil 7 points ago +7 / -0

This path also enables the maximum amount of “Trump stole the election and is illegitimate “ by the left.

They never ever wanted a smooth, gg type of election where Biden just shakes hands and leaves town. Fuck no. What kind of true leftist does that? They shit on everything on the way out and claim it’s your fault.

3
mintscape 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, we should all know this and it has been spoke about a lot but this is very risky. Even if successful for Trump to have a 2nd term, there will be so much violence from the left and Trump will have a very tainted presidency. Leftists would try to assonate him for certain. It is why the media is fueling them up.

One thing that is not mentioned is the speaker of the house, which is Pelosi, could refuse to seat the Republicans, so they can not vote at all.

The best way would be for the people to actually get active and out an end to this fraud, to protest, strike and engage in civil disobedience.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Cakes4077 1 point ago +1 / -0

8 assumes that the states don't decide on electors and the Supreme Court decision is after December 14. 9 is the case stipulated in the Constitution that no candidate has a majority of electoral college votes. If a state legislature doesn't designate their electors for a candidate, then they don't get a vote, which can lead to no one having a majority because a bunch of electors have a "vote" for no one.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Cakes4077 1 point ago +1 / -0

MI and WI have laws to fine/imprison faithless electors, which SCOTUS has deemed constitutional, but it is still possible they could defect.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
lifeisahologram 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is option B. But honestly if Option A fails, option C is more likely than this. Although option C is less desirable from a narrative standpoint because it is Trump simply using executive powers to address the fraud head on as an attack from enemies both foreign and domestic. While absolutely justified and legal, unfortunately a LOT of people are just not well informed, and it would be a shock to many. Hopefully it would wake enough people up though.

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

Question: It seems Trump dropped the "Chinese interference" narrative after the election. Or at least I haven't seen him tweet or mention about it. It says we are past that step but maybe once the Dominion stuff gets released he will go that angle?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1