1491
Comments (65)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Spottydog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whenever I try to bring up the crazy high voter turnout... I’ve been told by lib friends that the voter turnout % is not calculated based on the total number of registered voters, but on the total number of voting age population (some of whom may not be registered to vote)

I just don’t know what the definitive answer is. I swear I’m not a concern troll! I believe there was all kinds of fraud and in this election... but this the excuse I get whenever I try to bring this up.

And 98% is absolutely nuts! So even if it were based on voting age population would it still be in the high 80s? Which would also be statistically really unusual.

0
GEOTUSRocks [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

The number for voting age eligible people is considerably higher than registered voters. I don't see how it could be a better indicator because if you aren't registered, you can't vote.

1
Spottydog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, but that makes the voter turnout % lower than if it was based on registered voters. And I just don’t know if there is any official way to calculate this.

I mean... what I keep getting told is that calculating the voter turnout % based on register voter is not how it’s done. It’s based on voting age population. And I don’t know what the correct answer is. And I suspect it may be out of line with past elections even if it is to be calculated on voting age population.