Yeah, the SCYTL things seems like BS to me and the general seems a bit old and sickly on Kirk's show tonight - not sure I trust his judgement on this. I like Louie Gohmert, but he does tend to fall for these wilder conspiracy theories, so consider me highly skeptical right now.
I really hope Trump's team isn't being taken in by conspiracy theorists. They need rock-solid proof of election fraud, not the crackpot theories of QAnon. Unfortunately, I've seen both Lin Wood and Sidney Powell repeat BS in the past few days, which makes me worry that they're stepping foot into the vast, fantastical world of conspiracy theories for the first time and just plain don't have the skills to sift through all the BS just yet.
On the other hand, Scott Adams says that he's seen non-public, irrefutable proof of massive voter fraud, which he thinks will come out this week (or the next at the latest). And I trust his BS-detection better than Wood's or Powell's. So maybe good things are on the horizon.
Unfortunately, I've seen both Lin Wood and Sidney Powell repeat BS in the past few days, which makes me worry that they're stepping foot into the vast, fantastical world of conspiracy theories for the first time and just plain don't have the skills to sift through all the BS just yet.
Internally it could be something like "I've got really good proof of X, but I can't release it yet, but someone claims X in the wild, so I'm gonna echo their claim, even though they probably reached that conclusion via faulty logic."
The Scott Adams thing seems real, but he also says that the proof is gonna be something, which is persuasive enough for Trump fans, but not enough to give Trump a second term.
I'm still betting on Rudy bringing this home the old-fashioned way by going to SCOTUS and getting all non-observed votes thrown out.
I think what Scott means (based on what he said today) is that the proof is irrefutable, but the media and Democrats will ignore it anyway. Which is basically how they've been treating the evidence as well, so that doesn't come as much of a surprise.
And yeah, I do think there's a good chance that SCOTUS will decide things in Trump's favor. I'm hopeful they'll go even further and declare that voting machines are unconstitutional (there's an argument for it), as well as mail-in ballots. I think we're in do-or-die territory here, in terms of saving the Republic, and our conservative judges are smart enough to see what needs to be done.
So you're saying that the machine election fraud wasn't a massive conspiracy, but more like a cheat code that local dems use when needed to remain in power?
I hope it was a massive conspiracy, because that would be far easier for NSA to catch.
I'm sure that local dems have been using various ways of misconfiguring the voting machines to give an advantage to their guy, because it's just so easy to do and if you were looking for a way to cheat, you would find one pretty quickly just reading the manuals for the machines.
I agree with this. It reminds me of a time in college when a group of stupid kids in the class had the answers to our super difficult Physics final exam. They all planned on getting 85/100 on the exam so to not raise any suspicion from the professor. But because all of their grades going into the final were so low, each of them independently decided they would be the outlier who got a 98/100. If asked any questions, each of them believed they could justify their miraculous exam performance by saying they studied hard. When the exam results came back, it was easy for the professor to identify the cheaters. The lowest performing students in the class were the only people who nearly aced the hardest test of the year.
I watched over an hour of Charlie Kirks show tonight. It was interesting to say the least, the 3 star general that he had on first made a lot of sense, but the guy he had on after went on and on. I just pray that we get something to expose the fraud loud and clear
One problem with this theory, Q has said nothing about hammer or scorecard. A congressman (don't remember his name) mentioned Frankfurt servers being seized. And Sydney Powell suggestsed this mentioning Germany and the CIA. The CIA server farm in Frankfurt is also found in wikileaks.
Flooding of disinformation is on purpose to lump the real in with junk.
The dominion/Smartmatic piece is real and it’s a real problem for Dems. It’s a scandal.
The German server thing was fake and purposeful BS.
The hammer and scorecard to me was just a algorithm to flip votes. Just a name for the project. Dominion does some kind of algorithm too. They call them glitches.
Yeah, the SCYTL things seems like BS to me and the general seems a bit old and sickly on Kirk's show tonight - not sure I trust his judgement on this. I like Louie Gohmert, but he does tend to fall for these wilder conspiracy theories, so consider me highly skeptical right now.
I think the SCYTL thing is BS too. I watched the story balloon out of control in real-time. It was like a game of telephone.
Random guy on Twitter: "Hey, I have secret inside-information that the US army raided SCYTL this morning."
Louie Gohmert: "So, I saw this random tweet -- I don't know if it's true or not -- that said the US army raided SCYTL this morning."
George P: "BREAKING: Louie Gohmert confirms US army raided SCYTL."
TD.win: "🚨🚨🚨 THE US ARMY RAIDED SCYTL AND SEIZED THEIR SERVERS!!!! IT'S HAPPENING, PEDES!!!! 🚨🚨🚨"
I really hope Trump's team isn't being taken in by conspiracy theorists. They need rock-solid proof of election fraud, not the crackpot theories of QAnon. Unfortunately, I've seen both Lin Wood and Sidney Powell repeat BS in the past few days, which makes me worry that they're stepping foot into the vast, fantastical world of conspiracy theories for the first time and just plain don't have the skills to sift through all the BS just yet.
On the other hand, Scott Adams says that he's seen non-public, irrefutable proof of massive voter fraud, which he thinks will come out this week (or the next at the latest). And I trust his BS-detection better than Wood's or Powell's. So maybe good things are on the horizon.
Internally it could be something like "I've got really good proof of X, but I can't release it yet, but someone claims X in the wild, so I'm gonna echo their claim, even though they probably reached that conclusion via faulty logic."
The Scott Adams thing seems real, but he also says that the proof is gonna be something, which is persuasive enough for Trump fans, but not enough to give Trump a second term.
I'm still betting on Rudy bringing this home the old-fashioned way by going to SCOTUS and getting all non-observed votes thrown out.
I think what Scott means (based on what he said today) is that the proof is irrefutable, but the media and Democrats will ignore it anyway. Which is basically how they've been treating the evidence as well, so that doesn't come as much of a surprise.
And yeah, I do think there's a good chance that SCOTUS will decide things in Trump's favor. I'm hopeful they'll go even further and declare that voting machines are unconstitutional (there's an argument for it), as well as mail-in ballots. I think we're in do-or-die territory here, in terms of saving the Republic, and our conservative judges are smart enough to see what needs to be done.
It will be interesting to see what happens.
The movie version ten years from now will provide so much nostalgia for us, who were in the trenches while it happened :)
So you're saying that the machine election fraud wasn't a massive conspiracy, but more like a cheat code that local dems use when needed to remain in power?
I hope it was a massive conspiracy, because that would be far easier for NSA to catch.
I'm sure that local dems have been using various ways of misconfiguring the voting machines to give an advantage to their guy, because it's just so easy to do and if you were looking for a way to cheat, you would find one pretty quickly just reading the manuals for the machines.
I agree with this. It reminds me of a time in college when a group of stupid kids in the class had the answers to our super difficult Physics final exam. They all planned on getting 85/100 on the exam so to not raise any suspicion from the professor. But because all of their grades going into the final were so low, each of them independently decided they would be the outlier who got a 98/100. If asked any questions, each of them believed they could justify their miraculous exam performance by saying they studied hard. When the exam results came back, it was easy for the professor to identify the cheaters. The lowest performing students in the class were the only people who nearly aced the hardest test of the year.
I watched over an hour of Charlie Kirks show tonight. It was interesting to say the least, the 3 star general that he had on first made a lot of sense, but the guy he had on after went on and on. I just pray that we get something to expose the fraud loud and clear
Thanks for the wall of speculation.
https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1279590652200849409
For impatient, skip to 0:45
Where we go one, we go all.
The army thing sounded way too Q for me to believe it. I've said it time and time again, qtards are going to ruin our chances and they are.
One problem with this theory, Q has said nothing about hammer or scorecard. A congressman (don't remember his name) mentioned Frankfurt servers being seized. And Sydney Powell suggestsed this mentioning Germany and the CIA. The CIA server farm in Frankfurt is also found in wikileaks.
Flooding of disinformation is on purpose to lump the real in with junk.
The dominion/Smartmatic piece is real and it’s a real problem for Dems. It’s a scandal.
The German server thing was fake and purposeful BS.
The hammer and scorecard to me was just a algorithm to flip votes. Just a name for the project. Dominion does some kind of algorithm too. They call them glitches.
No such thing as Qanon.
qanon back in 10/2017 was a woman ... just saying
Interesting claim. Can you please elaborate on this?
well montigraph figured it out ...then was asked to remove the video by mid nov ...sadly because it had a great beat
alot of pics of obamas at their halloween alice party ...
theres a clue for you ;0
You mean the QLINTON video? There's no proof there.
no no clintons were not in that one
actually maybe huma but it was obamans well and nesbitts