This saying is a caution against taking things like little slights and inconveniences personally and holding grudges. It is not meant to imply that it is unwise to assume that a person caught in a criminal act intended to be committing a criminal act.
This application of the maxim relies on fallacious logic. Ego, ignorance, incompetence, and malice are not mutually exclusive properties, but even if they were, motivation is irrelevant in matters of law and order.
Ignorance of the law does not render the law unbroken. It doesn't matter if a drunk driver maliciously mows down a pedestrian, or if they in their ignorance allowed their ego to convince them that they were capable of driving in their condition. The person who was hit by the car is just as injured, and the driver is just as responsible for the outcome.
Exactly my point. It doesn't matter whether they claim it wasn't malice (it was), because the damage done is done. The law has been broken, and must be prosecuted.
None of us get away with saying, "Oh, but I didn't mean to" when we're in court. You can't even get out of a speeding ticket by saying, "I just wasn't paying attention" or "I didn't see the sign". Motive is inherent to the act. We're not talking about a murder mystery, it's election fraud. You cheat because you want to win, plain and simple.
This saying is a caution against taking things like little slights and inconveniences personally and holding grudges. It is not meant to imply that it is unwise to assume that a person caught in a criminal act intended to be committing a criminal act.
This application of the maxim relies on fallacious logic. Ego, ignorance, incompetence, and malice are not mutually exclusive properties, but even if they were, motivation is irrelevant in matters of law and order.
Ignorance of the law does not render the law unbroken. It doesn't matter if a drunk driver maliciously mows down a pedestrian, or if they in their ignorance allowed their ego to convince them that they were capable of driving in their condition. The person who was hit by the car is just as injured, and the driver is just as responsible for the outcome.
Yup, and from what I've seen the D's were using blacks like slaves.
Motive, stupid. God, you're an idiot.
Nevertheless, they broke the law. GUILTY!
Exactly my point. It doesn't matter whether they claim it wasn't malice (it was), because the damage done is done. The law has been broken, and must be prosecuted.
None of us get away with saying, "Oh, but I didn't mean to" when we're in court. You can't even get out of a speeding ticket by saying, "I just wasn't paying attention" or "I didn't see the sign". Motive is inherent to the act. We're not talking about a murder mystery, it's election fraud. You cheat because you want to win, plain and simple.
and i think Trump is somehow responsible for helping them have their voice heard.