As mentioned before, we use Benford’s law to justify an investigation and/or audit. The investigation or audit will reveal the evidence that we can use in court.
You're right. I've seen plenty on this site saying it is proof of shadiness, hence this post. I was under the impression that it was a smoking gun so I'm sure I'm not the only one.
We mainly used it to stabilize morale and show that there is good reason to believe that the results were not legitimate. Until these abnormalities are properly investigated, the results should not be legitimized.
Also, the guy in the video isn’t using the data sets that were actually called into question so he really isn’t debunking anything.
As mentioned before, we use Benford’s law to justify an investigation and/or audit. The investigation or audit will reveal the evidence that we can use in court.
You're right. I've seen plenty on this site saying it is proof of shadiness, hence this post. I was under the impression that it was a smoking gun so I'm sure I'm not the only one.
We mainly used it to stabilize morale and show that there is good reason to believe that the results were not legitimate. Until these abnormalities are properly investigated, the results should not be legitimized.
Also, the guy in the video isn’t using the data sets that were actually called into question so he really isn’t debunking anything.