this comment doesnt exactly help me, if there are a bunch of laws broken can you name a few?
I can't seem to find anything online about any laws broken but I KNOW at least something about this whole scenario is against the law... Given that google shows no results. And google is known for censoring truth.
The whole thing is absolutely bizarre to me. The Bidens have been working the grey area between legal and illegal for years. What really gets me is Pelosi and her ilk tried to impeach Trump over a phone call to the prez of Ukraine (and nothing untoward happened in that call, as we've read from the transcripts) -- in comparison, Biden and his lot have done waaaaaay worse dealings with both Ukraine and China (and prob many more).
I forgot to mention the most important bit: Quid Pro Joe. But some lovely Pedes have covered for my faux pas. Bless.
On the surface.Technically none. By just being there I mean. The real question was “What Did Joe Know?” They often yawned on about influence peddling/selling access to Trump, but it’s all about the kick backs really.
Hunter was born into being a Bagman. Which is really were the crimes are. I would assume, that whatever law prevents Joe from getting paid from some of these deals, there would be a
conspiracy, at least.
So really, as Rudy said, if he were to prosecute the case, he would do so as a Rico case.
Which Rico has all types of things for financial crimes and la la la. There’s even talk of nuclear ☢️ in there.
What laws did they not break?
this comment doesnt exactly help me, if there are a bunch of laws broken can you name a few?
I can't seem to find anything online about any laws broken but I KNOW at least something about this whole scenario is against the law... Given that google shows no results. And google is known for censoring truth.
the Ukraine scandal explained https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nUZekJ3pfM
It’s the quid pro quo that they accused Trump of.
Officials can’t accept more than $20 in gifts from foreigners before having to fully disclose what happened. That wasn’t done.
Public officials can’t take actions to benefit their own families, such as selling access to the VP office for money.
Fire the prosecutor investigating my son or I will withhold aid to your country. This is illegal.
Off the record meeting with those who paid Hunter. That’s a coverup of the family crime organization.
Bribes, blackmail pictures and videos, etc.
This is what I'm after, cheers bro! have an upvote.
That’s more of a Joe crime. But Rico is Rico :D
gnews.org has the lap top contents up for those that have the interest.
Massive illegal fuckery.
The whole thing is absolutely bizarre to me. The Bidens have been working the grey area between legal and illegal for years. What really gets me is Pelosi and her ilk tried to impeach Trump over a phone call to the prez of Ukraine (and nothing untoward happened in that call, as we've read from the transcripts) -- in comparison, Biden and his lot have done waaaaaay worse dealings with both Ukraine and China (and prob many more).
I forgot to mention the most important bit: Quid Pro Joe. But some lovely Pedes have covered for my faux pas. Bless.
On the surface.Technically none. By just being there I mean. The real question was “What Did Joe Know?” They often yawned on about influence peddling/selling access to Trump, but it’s all about the kick backs really.
Hunter was born into being a Bagman. Which is really were the crimes are. I would assume, that whatever law prevents Joe from getting paid from some of these deals, there would be a conspiracy, at least.
So really, as Rudy said, if he were to prosecute the case, he would do so as a Rico case. Which Rico has all types of things for financial crimes and la la la. There’s even talk of nuclear ☢️ in there.
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/content/rico-act.html
Well, probably corruption, bribery, money laundering, fraud, FARA violations (being a foreign agent without registering).
That should get them started.
We don't know that. It has never been completely investigated.
That's the whole point of the swamp.To create legal fuckery.