3117
Comments (54)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
53
trumpshouldhavewon 53 points ago +53 / -0

Remember they only have to show there is a possibility, they need not show it actually happened!

27
BillyBobBastard [S] 27 points ago +28 / -1

I am not a lawyer. Can you elaborate?

76
TheWatcherWhoWatches 76 points ago +76 / -0

If the devices used are shown to be vulnerable, by definition they are not fit to tabulate election results. Further, if you can prove you can change numbers without leaving a trace, then technically there is no way to prove the numbers were changed, so you have to assume they were.

Factor in all the statistical analysis and you have a smoking gun.

Factor in the whistleblowers and you have won.

36
Shakakka99 36 points ago +37 / -1

I hope you're right about this. What they need is someone who actually changed vote totals to come forward, tell how and when they did it, and point it out in the election night data. Give this person scumbag immunity for all I care, as long as he/she is willing to give up their superiors and co-conspirators and burn this whole fucking thing down.

26
The_Def_of_Is_Is 26 points ago +26 / -0

You are looking for a person who would commit treason for money yet would risk certain death to set the record straight for honor. Such a person, I fear, does not exist.

6
ontothefuture 6 points ago +6 / -0

Either this ^ or they need to show indisputable proof of it, otherwise they won’t overturn anything.

We know the fraud happened on multiple fronts but it’s going to take mathematical proof for courts to agree.

5
Grond999 5 points ago +5 / -0

...exactly. With the threat of prison sentences hanging over their heads. As the largely anti-American FBI is working against Trump it is a pity they can't be relied on to help bring get some leftist operatives to tell the truth. If Trump pulls through, he needs to fucking savage the FBI from top to bottom. He also needs assistance with hiring by hard core patriots. 'Look the other Wray' has been a real Bolton.

2
Phins360_FL 2 points ago +2 / -0

will that hold up in a court?

Seems circumstantial

I'm not a lawyer pede so any explanation would be most welcome.

1
goodatlife123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fraud vitiates everything

6
My2Cents 6 points ago +6 / -0

possibility=actuality is a dubious claim.

It is possible you committed a murder in your community, therefore you are guilty?

Maybe the argument that vote machines capable of covert fraud are negligently risky could work, but "experts" on the other side are going to deny.

Am hoping the Kracken is irrefutable statistical proof of fraud.