Nah you are reading it wrong. Right now Big Tech is doing their censoring in the USA with the cloak of "private businesses can do what they want". Instead Big Tech wants the cloak of "the government forced us to censor you" to shield them from liability.
The uniparty uses natural chaos as the raw material of change (search ordo ab chao). When humans face uncertainity their brains try to latch onto something secure. So in this case we have a natural chaotic situation we all want resolved ("big tech is censoring certain view points") that is at a decision point (they keep getting called in front of Congress) and they are hoping to hijack the movement for their own goals. They do it everytime. Look at the laws that follow every big event you can think of over the last 20-30 years - always commie / fascist type laws.
Thanks, I understand the principle but hadn't thought to apply it to this story - it did make me wonder considering all the bias is in their direction.
No problem. I've followed this sort of stuff since Ron Paul was running for President and watched the MSM censor him. That was when I was woken up to that there was something behind the scenes controlling multiple aspects of society so I have a little bit of a leg up researching all of this I think.
A technique that I've honed is to find something concrete in your beliefs and challenge it mentally for a long time / constantly. If you are religious pray on the topic and consult the Bible for answers. When you are sure you know right from wrong on that thing go look how politicians vote / act when their backs are up against a wall on that issue (for instance RINOs are allowed to vote-pretend conservatively until something has a real chance of passing/not passing in a direction the globalists don't want - then their true orders come out). If you find someone votes against that "concrete" belief of yours you've now got a way to have discernment on what the "powers that be" are up to.
For instance, in this case almost all Democrats are openly against all that is good. So much so that when they say something that seems to be right ("Facebook is doing something wrong", etc.) you know they are moving one of their chess pieces in place and can start to look into why.
I could go on and on with other strategies but I will leave it at that for now.
Nah you are reading it wrong. Right now Big Tech is doing their censoring in the USA with the cloak of "private businesses can do what they want". Instead Big Tech wants the cloak of "the government forced us to censor you" to shield them from liability.
The uniparty uses natural chaos as the raw material of change (search ordo ab chao). When humans face uncertainity their brains try to latch onto something secure. So in this case we have a natural chaotic situation we all want resolved ("big tech is censoring certain view points") that is at a decision point (they keep getting called in front of Congress) and they are hoping to hijack the movement for their own goals. They do it everytime. Look at the laws that follow every big event you can think of over the last 20-30 years - always commie / fascist type laws.
Thanks, I understand the principle but hadn't thought to apply it to this story - it did make me wonder considering all the bias is in their direction.
No problem. I've followed this sort of stuff since Ron Paul was running for President and watched the MSM censor him. That was when I was woken up to that there was something behind the scenes controlling multiple aspects of society so I have a little bit of a leg up researching all of this I think.
A technique that I've honed is to find something concrete in your beliefs and challenge it mentally for a long time / constantly. If you are religious pray on the topic and consult the Bible for answers. When you are sure you know right from wrong on that thing go look how politicians vote / act when their backs are up against a wall on that issue (for instance RINOs are allowed to vote-pretend conservatively until something has a real chance of passing/not passing in a direction the globalists don't want - then their true orders come out). If you find someone votes against that "concrete" belief of yours you've now got a way to have discernment on what the "powers that be" are up to.
For instance, in this case almost all Democrats are openly against all that is good. So much so that when they say something that seems to be right ("Facebook is doing something wrong", etc.) you know they are moving one of their chess pieces in place and can start to look into why.
I could go on and on with other strategies but I will leave it at that for now.