I hear lots of people on TD very skeptical of Scott Adams. For context, he essentially is riding hard on teasing that massive fraud PROOF is incoming, enough to swing the election.

I've heard many skeptical takes on Scott on this site. Many say "I feel his sources are this website".

I disagree.

He swears up and down that the evidence he is referring to hasn't been seen yet, and that it will alter our reality when it does. He spends time daily on Twitter smugly rubbing it in libs' faces that it is coming.

In short, I believe Scott, because he is essentially putting his credibility on the line. His entire brand is that he is a smug, genius oracle who looks at things in ways we do not. If the massive Trump evidence does not arrive, his brand will never recover and he will look like a joke.

Anybody who follows Scott regularly knows that the man certainly has an ego and loves flaunting his intelligence. I just simply don't believe he would put his reputation on the line if he didn't legitimately know something we do not.

Happy to be called a retarded faggot if you disagree.