9945
Comments (825)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
159
Farnsworth 159 points ago +160 / -1

Here’s an explanation linked below. There’s irregularities like people voting twice, people voted who were not registered to vote, etc. Seems criminal to reject one race due to irregularities but then certify the other races, like the presidential race, that were on the same ballot.

https://www.8newsnow.com/news/local-news/clark-county-to-certify-election-at-1-p-m/

142
uzi5v2 142 points ago +145 / -3

It’s also illegal to bring 100,000 ballets, all for one candidate, in through the back door of a counting place at 4:30 am yet here we are.

50
BeefChucker 50 points ago +51 / -1

“Doe’S weRe jUst maIL inn voTeS!”

5
Inertargongas 5 points ago +5 / -0

If we had info on those batches of mail ins, it would be very interesting to see if any of those voters even requested a ballot.

2
micaarzur 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who knows if they even have names on them for fuck's sake... no one has been able to look at them besides the ANTIFA/BLM poll workers.

1
BeefChucker 1 point ago +1 / -0

They hve total control of the system. They can add anyone to the absentee roster and vote for them. Electronic voting and mail in are simply ways to rig elections

1
makethemwatch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope the Trump team is calling all of the low turnout voters that voted absentee this time to make sure they really requested those ballots.

6
sleepingbeautyc 6 points ago +6 / -0

Really? hmmmm

41
deleted 41 points ago +42 / -1
11
williammcfadden 11 points ago +11 / -0

That's what the courts are for.

22
Hattmall 22 points ago +29 / -7

Damn, that doesn't actually look that good, that race was down to 10 votes, unfortunately I don't see it impacting Trump. Hopefully it can be grounds for a lawsuit or something.

41
Farnsworth 41 points ago +43 / -2

That race was separated by 10 votes, but according to this article they didn’t certify it because they’ve found almost 2500 fraudulent votes. Trump is only down around 30,000 in Nevada. That 2500 is only from 1 district. Imagine 2500 fraudulent votes multiplied by how ever many districts are in Nevada? Plus, allowing 2500 fraudulent votes through initially may give more credence to Trump’s lawsuit about poor signature matching in Nevada. Here’s an article about the signature matching issue:

https://aclj.org/election-law/lower-integrity-of-signature-matching-in-nevada-should-be-concern-for-court-the-integrity-of-our-elections-at-stake

19
papaMAGA 19 points ago +20 / -1

Pretty sure this is the largest county in Nevada, and most of the state is uninhabited. So let's not extrapolate too much.

11
sleepingbeautyc 11 points ago +12 / -1

The article says this:

The focus was narrowed to the County Commission District C race due to the tight 10-vote difference. After ruling out a recount, that would not change the discrepancies that Gloria identified, the board ultimately decided to certify all the election results except for the Clark County Commission District C race results; a special election will now be considered for that race only in December.

Doesn't that mean that they aren't certifying the Presidential votes? I am a little confused because Trump said this is good and I trust him. So what am I misunderstanding?

15
Logan_W_Logan 15 points ago +15 / -0

Good for a lawsuit. They admit there are problems that they cannot rectify, including fraud, but they are still certifying votes except for one race just because it’s really close.

4
AlphaNathan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Best explanation in the thread, thank you.

10
RocksCanOnlyWait 10 points ago +11 / -1

It's evidence of large-scale voting irregularities - something the media claim doesn't exist.

The lawyers for the commisioner's race showed that the irregularities vastly outnumbered the margin of victory with known irregularities and many more unverified irregularities existed.

Trump's lawyers can use the evidence from the commisioner race and build on it for their case.

1
sleepingbeautyc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh thank you so much. You can depend on the Dems to cheat wildly even amongst themselves.

5
drdespinz 5 points ago +7 / -2

It means after audit they found irregularities in tens of ballots, which is a problem for only the commissioner's race since that was won by a margin of 10 votes. The outcome will not change for the presidential race, because the margin for biden in Clark County is near 90K+ Biden after audit and the irregularities were only in the 10's of ballots. They say it in the next tweet: https://twitter.com/meganmesserly/status/1328450441315684352

2
Farnsworth 2 points ago +4 / -2

Way more than “10’s of ballots.”. For the regular ballots:

  • 936 discrepancies in ballots
  • 710 with mail-in precincts
  • 121 in early voting precincts
  • 105 on Election Day
  • 6 voters voted twice

For the provisional ballots:

  • 115 voters had already voted
  • 142 voted in wrong district or wrong precincts
  • 8 were not eligible to vote
  • 1,925 were not registered to vote
  • 53 did not provide adequate proof-of-residence or a valid identification
2
drdespinz 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yes, there were more flagged ballots. It said all the discrepancies were resolved save for 10's of ballots. Those are the breakdowns you are mentioning and they were excluded from the counts.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0