The usb backdoor used to access scanner is called the SANE project is in this code: https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/blob/master/backend/canon_dr.c
"Smartmatic www.smartmatic.com provided testing and changes for DR-X10C support"
proof georgia used the scanner:
https://sos.ga.gov/admin/files/Unisyn%20RFI_Redacted.pdf
you can also see how much the scanner was used last election here:https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VotingSystems/audits/2014GeneralPEA/Delta2014GeneralPEA.pdf
You can see in the comments the developers didn't want to credit smartmatic: https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/merge_requests/12#note_139722740
The sane project is in an open source API stack, a 20 year old project with hundreds of people and companies submitting commits just like in any open source project.
Don't spread conspiracy theories.
But why did smartamatic add support for the DR-X10C ballot scanner in the last year? Why would they make changes to add a ballot scanner into 20 year old code that can be used as a usb backdoor to change results. Have you looked at the code and seen what the SANE project is capable of?
I have reviewed the code and did not notice any potential fuckery.
Tbh altering the counts, or “glitches” in recognition of votes on the scanned ballot (closed source code) is a lot more likely source of fraud.
I can't see any fuckery either I'm thinking they added compatibility with freelancers and we can't see the branch with the fraudulent code.