250
Comments (21)
sorted by:
11
sustainable_saltmine 11 points ago +11 / -0

Kraken has to be more than anecdotes. Need hard evidence. Not just affidavits

6
MAGA1775 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is not the full Kraken. Its just an affidavit that Sidney released from it. She's releasing the full thing tomorrow.

1
memeops_specialist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it tomorrow? This is so f****** annoying. Release the kraken already.

2
MAGA1775 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, its tomorrow. These things take time. Seems people don't have patience anymore, remember Bush vs Gore?

1
memeops_specialist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, I have an exam on friday, and i am f****** obsessed, i can't let it go.

1
redstampede 1 point ago +1 / -0

I remember. That's why I've been calm about this. Weeks and weeks of slow trickles of information, with a lot less at stake then. I think Trump's team has massive amounts of evidence, and by the time this reaches SCOTUS there will probably be whole oceans of it for that kraken to swim in.

6
MAGA1775 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is not the full Kraken....just an affidavit from it

2
spread_em [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s basically outlines what Sidney has, sucks that it’s just someone’s word, I really thought it was going to be a raided server with first hand proof of the 2020 election. Hopefully they have more than this.

5
MAGA1775 5 points ago +5 / -0

Where does she say this outlines all she has?

Stop with the doomer shit. This is just an affidavit that she released that is part of the entire package. Maybe its a bombshell, or maybe its nothing. We'll find out tomorrow.

7
spread_em [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Fingers crossed for tomorrow

3
MAGA1775 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same!

1
pede-o-saurus 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know a funny thing about law: someone's word is actually evidence. It's called sworn testimony and it's useful for things like winning court cases. If she has a witness who knows how the rigging works and will testify, that's a nuke, it's even better than a raided server.

1
rebelde_sin_causa 1 point ago +1 / -0

There may not be such a thing

2
45semiautosp 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is good in that it establishes that such software exists.

5
DrownByAqua 5 points ago +5 / -0

Crazy how institutions that's supposed to protect the integrity of the election do nothing, and the American people need to rely on affidavits from whistleblowers.

2
MAGA1775 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its a clear sign at how far corrupted our government, media, and institutions have become.

2
MooseKnukl3 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm releasing a large kraken right now reading this

2
slewrock 2 points ago +2 / -0

This doesn't move the needle.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
HumasTaint 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sure Jan.

0
mythbusterr 0 points ago +1 / -1

The first thing the judge will say is "Okay you admit to hacking the Venezuelan election. Did you hack the US election?"