261
posted ago by eplettner ago by eplettner +261 / -0

The evidence being compiled is for the courts. That is all that matters. Why would we release the evidence early? No one besides the courts will make the decision.

This is straight concern trolling and people should be deported if they keep this up.

Comments (25)
sorted by:
11
johnkongsang 11 points ago +11 / -0

Sidney Powell said it best in one of her interviews- she’s not going to release evidence she’s using against them [to burn their house to the ground] in court.

8
FreeSpeechMaster 8 points ago +8 / -0

She has to release the evidence to them before court. It's called the "discovery" process. You can't "ambush" in court anymore.

5
betterlivinglinux 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tell that to Judge Sullivan...he ambushed Flynn in the last hearing with non discovery evidence!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
me-no-likely 3 points ago +3 / -0

figuratively

2
FreeSpeechMaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, I meant that in a total, literal sense....but only if we resorted to war. Other than that, all we have are the courts to seek remedy against such a piece of shit.

1
me-no-likely 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it comes to it, have you heard of quartering? Even better!

7
INSSABOFA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Haven't we seen enough evidence to know the fraud is overwhelming?

3
Baryonic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah - but proving it is another matter. The court has a stupid high standard for throwing out a vote. They act like a mail in ballot with no chain of custody or signature has the same weight as a polling place ballot with ID verification. It is a damn near impossible task to get a court to overturn an election without something so convincing that it was unambiguously true. They cannot make a statistical case or even a cirumstantial case. They almost need widespread recordings of the data-streams and a log of the modifications to the record.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
7
weltbild 7 points ago +9 / -2

maybe then do less TV appearances teasing it while not delivering?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
lastcubestanding 4 points ago +4 / -0

TICK TOCK - iTS hABbEnInG - gET In HeRe

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
DeadOverRed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hhahahahahahahahahah courts hahahahahahhahaha.

Like the ones holding Flynn and Kyle hostage? Those courts?

3
Baryonic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah yeah - I get that - but I still need evidence to accept claims for any side in a political and information war.

1
eplettner [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is tons of information in the Math and filed legal cases, use that.

We don't matter in this fight your not going to convince any dams so why try

2
MaximusDecimusMeridi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree and disagree both. I understand the need to not disclose some things, but also understand the nation is festering during this fight and getting worse by the day.

2
eplettner [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they release while they are still digging they only have to get one tiny thing wrong for Dems/Media to say it's all false. They are going to get it for 100% correct before they release it as they should

2
cnn_can_dox_my_balls 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does anyone remember Moses the Raven from Animal Farm?

He claimed to know of the existence of a mysterious country called Sugarcandy Mountain, to which all animals went when they died. It was situated somewhere up in the sky, a little distance beyond the clouds, Moses said. In Sugarcandy Mountain it was Sunday seven days a week, clover was in season all the year round, and lump sugar and linseed cake grew on the hedges.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
eplettner [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's public information put the list together yourself and stop complaining.

Hold the line!!!!

1
WorstVikingEver 1 point ago +1 / -0

but but but trump lawyers wont tell the twat bearded nerds all the info on the interwebs so its a tick tock !

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2