702
Comments (25)
sorted by:
25
spinometer 25 points ago +25 / -0

By default the software switches 3% of the vote creating a 6% gap. If your chosen candidate needs more than that then you need to buy the deluxe package.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
10
EyesInTheHills 10 points ago +10 / -0

Born out by the NH recounts where Republican candidates saw an average swing of ~6% in their favor.

https://twitter.com/YossiGestetner/status/1327972165975756802

2
ModernKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

👆I do believe this is it.

2
TheKeagleciser 2 points ago +2 / -0

The seasons pass gets you a congress seat for 30 years +

2
sometimescanbefunny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only if you're a D or a RINO - if you don't play nice, you get the Seth Rich treatment.

2
onedeplorable 2 points ago +2 / -0

You need a better candidate

13
LArnix 13 points ago +13 / -0

its 3% from R to D. for a total of 6%.

10
Kekbewithus 10 points ago +10 / -0

3% is what they thought they could get away with and what they thought they needed to win.

They were dead wrong on both counts.

9
jackneefus 9 points ago +9 / -0

Powell mentioned several days ago that up to 3% of votes in certain areas were flipped. She implied that the 3% capability is built into Dominion machines. 6% implies 3% subtracted from a Republican candidate and 3% added to the Democrat.

9
Michael032817 9 points ago +9 / -0

6 percent plus mail in ballots. I feel that’s how they did it.

6
byron 6 points ago +6 / -0

The mail in ballots were to try to legitimize the 6% difference. That's why they stopped on election night, they had to come up with extra ballots. Throw away stacks of Trump ballots and add stacks of Biden ballots. That's why a normal recount won't work.

3
Michael032817 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly we need the mail in ballots thrown out under the equal protection clause.

7
Tyrant597 7 points ago +7 / -0

She said they had figured out the algorithm that was swapping votes.

6
OwnaLib87 6 points ago +6 / -0

REMINDER THAT DONALD TRUMP WON 2016 DESPITE RIGGED ELECTION

5
shade1k 5 points ago +5 / -0

If she has evidence of the algorithm, then she would possibly know the parameters of normal operation.

4
IntrepidBurger 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's because 3% is the margin of error in polling and can be buried as "within the margins". And if you look at legitimate races you typically have no more than a 6% spread normally, meaning a flip of that much would guarantee 99% of race outcomes.

Turns out that Trump won by a lot more than that in both 2016 and 2020 which is why there's so much rampant fraud now.

7
MakeAmericaLegendary 7 points ago +7 / -0

Despite a constant propaganda campaign, our President still crushed every metric in United States history. I wish there was some kind of award we the citizens could give him, some kind of higher honor above the title of President. But maybe the fact that the U.S. adores this man is enough.

6
IntrepidBurger 6 points ago +6 / -0

He will be remembered more fondly than Reagan in a few decades time. He will be the standard that all future Republicans hold up as an example of good conservatism.

4
theSocraticChallenge 4 points ago +4 / -0

Seems fishy: it's my understanding the big guy is supposed to get 10%.

3
MehNahMehNah 3 points ago +3 / -0

I suspect the original fix became untenable when in order to succeed it would appear more votes would have been cast than there were voters.

3
South_Florida_Guy 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's probably about a 2.5-3.0% take a vote/give a vote steal.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
MrsSilenceDogood 3 points ago +3 / -0

6% for the Big man

2
TheMadManDidItAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think because of the huge amount of votes Trump was getting that the algorithms were not working the way they wanted to, so they lowered the threshold in these key swing states. Some places are 0.51%, which makes them ineligible for a recount.